Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

Authors: Samer L. Traboulsi, David-Dan Nguyen, Ahmed S. Zakaria, Kyle W. Law, Hanna Shahine, Malek Meskawi, Cristina Negrean, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Assaad El Hakim, Kevin C. Zorn

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to compare postoperative functional outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in elderly men with localized prostate cancer.

Methods

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of men who underwent RARP between January 2007 and November 2018 was performed. Patients over 65 years of age were selected (N = 302) and then stratified by age group: 66–69 years old (N = 214) and ≥ 70 years old (N = 88). Full continence was defined as strict 0-pad per day usage. Preoperative potency included those with a Sexual Health Inventory for Men score ≥ 17. Preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes were assessed. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate time to recovery of continence in both groups.

Results

Both groups had comparable preoperative parameters. Continence rates at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months in the 66–69-year-old group were 6%, 34%, 61%, 70%, 74%, 80% and 87%, respectively. Comparatively in the ≥ 70-year-old group, continence rates were significantly lower at all time points (3%, 22%, 50%, 56%, 66%, 69% and 75%, respectively). Men in the 66–69-year-old group were significantly more likely to be continent after RARP when compared to patients 70 years of age and above [(Hazards ratio (HR) 0.73; 95%confidence interval 0.54–0.97, (p = 0.035)].

Conclusion

Our results suggest that RARP is feasible in elderly patients. Nevertheless, elderly patients in the ≥ 70-year-old group had significantly inferior postoperative continence rates compared to patients aged 66–69 years. Such information is valuable when counselling men during preoperative RARP planning to ensure that they have realistic postoperative expectations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morgan TM, Kaffenberger SD, Cookson MS (2012) Surgical and chemotherapeutic management of regional lymph nodes in bladder cancer. J Urol 188(4):1081–1088CrossRef Morgan TM, Kaffenberger SD, Cookson MS (2012) Surgical and chemotherapeutic management of regional lymph nodes in bladder cancer. J Urol 188(4):1081–1088CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Greco KA et al (2009) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men aged %3e or =70 years. BJU Int 104(10):1492–1495CrossRef Greco KA et al (2009) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men aged %3e or =70 years. BJU Int 104(10):1492–1495CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Buscarini M, Josephson DY, Stein JP (2007) Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: a review. Urol Int 79(3):191–199CrossRef Buscarini M, Josephson DY, Stein JP (2007) Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: a review. Urol Int 79(3):191–199CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Huang GJ, Sadetsky N, Penson DF (2010) Health related quality of life for men treated for localized prostate cancer with long-term followup. J Urol 183(6):2206–2212CrossRef Huang GJ, Sadetsky N, Penson DF (2010) Health related quality of life for men treated for localized prostate cancer with long-term followup. J Urol 183(6):2206–2212CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ficarra V et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417CrossRef Ficarra V et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zorn KC et al (2007) Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 1(2):125–132CrossRef Zorn KC et al (2007) Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 1(2):125–132CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chien GW et al (2005) Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology 66(2):419–423CrossRef Chien GW et al (2005) Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology 66(2):419–423CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zorn KC et al (2007) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 51(3):755–762 (Discussion 763)CrossRef Zorn KC et al (2007) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 51(3):755–762 (Discussion 763)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shalhav AL et al (2006) Minimizing knot tying during reconstructive laparoscopic urology. Urology 68(3):508–513CrossRef Shalhav AL et al (2006) Minimizing knot tying during reconstructive laparoscopic urology. Urology 68(3):508–513CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Eastham JA et al (1996) Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 156(5):1707–1713CrossRef Eastham JA et al (1996) Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 156(5):1707–1713CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kim JJ et al (2012) Independent predictors of recovery of continence 3 months after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 26(10):1290–1295CrossRef Kim JJ et al (2012) Independent predictors of recovery of continence 3 months after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 26(10):1290–1295CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ku JH (2010) Role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of bladder cancer: a mini review. Korean J Urol 51(6):371–378CrossRef Ku JH (2010) Role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of bladder cancer: a mini review. Korean J Urol 51(6):371–378CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Fine J (2005) 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 293(17):2095–2101CrossRef Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Fine J (2005) 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 293(17):2095–2101CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Alibhai SM et al (2003) Do older men benefit from curative therapy of localized prostate cancer? J Clin Oncol 21(17):3318–3327CrossRef Alibhai SM et al (2003) Do older men benefit from curative therapy of localized prostate cancer? J Clin Oncol 21(17):3318–3327CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Proctor DN et al (2000) Relative influence of physical activity, muscle mass and strength on bone density. Osteoporos Int 11(11):944–952CrossRef Proctor DN et al (2000) Relative influence of physical activity, muscle mass and strength on bone density. Osteoporos Int 11(11):944–952CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Disterhoft JF, Oh MM (2006) Learning, aging and intrinsic neuronal plasticity. Trends Neurosci 29(10):587–599CrossRef Disterhoft JF, Oh MM (2006) Learning, aging and intrinsic neuronal plasticity. Trends Neurosci 29(10):587–599CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kumar A et al (2015) Age stratified comparative analysis of perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients after robot assisted radical prostatectomy—A propensity score matched study. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(7):837–843CrossRef Kumar A et al (2015) Age stratified comparative analysis of perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients after robot assisted radical prostatectomy—A propensity score matched study. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(7):837–843CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Labanaris AP, Witt JH, Zugor V (2012) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men %3e/=75 years of age. Surgical, oncological and functional outcomes. Anticancer Res 32(5):2085–2089 Labanaris AP, Witt JH, Zugor V (2012) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men %3e/=75 years of age. Surgical, oncological and functional outcomes. Anticancer Res 32(5):2085–2089
19.
go back to reference Shikanov S et al (2010) Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. J Urol 183(5):1803–1807CrossRef Shikanov S et al (2010) Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. J Urol 183(5):1803–1807CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rocco F et al (2006) Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175(6):2201–2206CrossRef Rocco F et al (2006) Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175(6):2201–2206CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schlomm T et al (2011) Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 60(2):320–329CrossRef Schlomm T et al (2011) Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 60(2):320–329CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
Authors
Samer L. Traboulsi
David-Dan Nguyen
Ahmed S. Zakaria
Kyle W. Law
Hanna Shahine
Malek Meskawi
Cristina Negrean
Pierre I. Karakiewicz
Assaad El Hakim
Kevin C. Zorn
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03096-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

World Journal of Urology 11/2020 Go to the issue