Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 1/2021

Open Access 01-01-2021 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Termination rates and histological reclassification of active surveillance patients with low- and early intermediate-risk prostate cancer: results of the PREFERE trial

Authors: Peter Albers, Thomas Wiegel, Heinz Schmidberger, Roswitha Bussar-Maatz, Martin Härter, Glen Kristiansen, Peter Martus, Christoph Meisner, Stefan Wellek, Klaus Grozinger, Peter Renner, Martin Burmester, Fried Schneider, Michael Stöckle

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Active surveillance (AS) strategies for patients with low- and early intermediate-risk prostate cancer are still not consistently defined. Within a controlled randomized trial, active surveillance was compared to other treatment options for patients with prostate cancer. Aim of this analysis was to report on termination rates of patients treated with AS including different grade groups.

Methods

A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy, active surveillance, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy was performed from 2013 to 2016 and included 345 patients with low- and early intermediate-risk prostate cancer (ISUP grade groups 1 and 2). The trial was prematurely stopped due to slow accrual. A total of 130 patients were treated with active surveillance. Among them, 42 patients were diagnosed with intermediate-risk PCA. Reference pathology and AS quality control were performed throughout.

Results

After a median follow-up time of 18.8 months, 73 out of the 130 patients (56%) terminated active surveillance. Of these, 56 (77%) patients were histologically reclassified at the time of rebiopsy, including 35% and 60% of the grade group 1 and 2 patients, respectively. No patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at the time of reclassification had radical prostatectomy specimens ≥ grade group 3.

Conclusion

In this prospectively analyzed subcohort of patients with AS and conventional staging within a randomized trial, the 2-year histological reclassification rates were higher than those previously reported. Active surveillance may not be based on conventional staging alone, and patients with grade group 2 cancers may be recommended for active surveillance in carefully controlled trials only.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Klotz L (2019) Contemporary approach to active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer. Asian J Urol 6:146–152CrossRef Klotz L (2019) Contemporary approach to active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer. Asian J Urol 6:146–152CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ross HM, Kryvenko ON, Cowan JE et al (2012) Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with gleason score (GS)_6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes? Am J Surg Pathol 36:1346–1352CrossRef Ross HM, Kryvenko ON, Cowan JE et al (2012) Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with gleason score (GS)_6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes? Am J Surg Pathol 36:1346–1352CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Eggener SE, Scardino PT, Walsh PC et al (2011) Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 185:869–875CrossRef Eggener SE, Scardino PT, Walsh PC et al (2011) Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 185:869–875CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Inoue LY, Trock BJ, Partin AW et al (2014) Modeling grade progression in an active surveillance study. Stat Med 33:930–939CrossRef Inoue LY, Trock BJ, Partin AW et al (2014) Modeling grade progression in an active surveillance study. Stat Med 33:930–939CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA et al (2016) 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. NEJM 375:1415–1424CrossRef Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA et al (2016) 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. NEJM 375:1415–1424CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H et al (2014) Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 370:932–942CrossRef Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H et al (2014) Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 370:932–942CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cooperberg MR, Cowan JE, Hilton JF et al (2011) Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:228–234CrossRef Cooperberg MR, Cowan JE, Hilton JF et al (2011) Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:228–234CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bul M, van den Bergh RCN, Zhu X et al (2012) Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:1672–1677CrossRef Bul M, van den Bergh RCN, Zhu X et al (2012) Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:1672–1677CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ohlmann CH, Stöckle M, Albers P et al (2016) PREFERE—study on the rise. Urologe A 55:313–317CrossRef Ohlmann CH, Stöckle M, Albers P et al (2016) PREFERE—study on the rise. Urologe A 55:313–317CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tokas T, Grabski B, Paul U et al (2018) A 12-year follow-up of ANNA/C-TRUS image-targeted biopsies in patients suspicious for prostate cancer. World J Urol 36:699–704CrossRef Tokas T, Grabski B, Paul U et al (2018) A 12-year follow-up of ANNA/C-TRUS image-targeted biopsies in patients suspicious for prostate cancer. World J Urol 36:699–704CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H et al (2018) Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer—29-year follow-up. NEJM 379:2319–2329CrossRef Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H et al (2018) Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer—29-year follow-up. NEJM 379:2319–2329CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Klotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P et al (2015) Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:272–277CrossRef Klotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P et al (2015) Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:272–277CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bul M, Zhu X, Valdagni R et al (2013) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 63:597–603CrossRef Bul M, Zhu X, Valdagni R et al (2013) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 63:597–603CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. NEJM 378:1767–1777CrossRef Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. NEJM 378:1767–1777CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fam MM, Yabes JG, Macleod LC et al (2019) Increasing utilization of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer surveillance. Urology 130:99–105CrossRef Fam MM, Yabes JG, Macleod LC et al (2019) Increasing utilization of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer surveillance. Urology 130:99–105CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Termination rates and histological reclassification of active surveillance patients with low- and early intermediate-risk prostate cancer: results of the PREFERE trial
Authors
Peter Albers
Thomas Wiegel
Heinz Schmidberger
Roswitha Bussar-Maatz
Martin Härter
Glen Kristiansen
Peter Martus
Christoph Meisner
Stefan Wellek
Klaus Grozinger
Peter Renner
Martin Burmester
Fried Schneider
Michael Stöckle
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03154-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

World Journal of Urology 1/2021 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the editor