Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Shock | Original Article

The alternating bidirectional versus the standard approach during shock wave lithotripsy for upper lumbar ureteric stones: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Mohammed Hegazy, Ahmed El-Assmy, Bedeir Ali-El-Dein, Khaled Z. Sheir

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for upper lumbar ureteric stones using the alternating bidirectional approach versus the standard approach during the first session.

Methods

Our study was a randomized controlled trial including patients with single radio-opaque stone < 1 cm located in the upper lumbar ureter (from the ureteropelvic junction till the level medial to the lower margin of the kidney). SWL was conducted using electromagnetic Dornier Gemini Lithotripter. In group 1, patients were treated with the alternating under and over-table approach during the first session only and if other sessions were needed, the standard under-table approach was used. In group 2, patients were treated with the standard under-table approach during all sessions. Stone disintegration after the first session was assessed by kidney–ureter–bladder X-ray, renal ultrasonography and noncontrast computed tomography. Moreover, the incidence and severity of postoperative complications were evaluated.

Results

Forty-eight patients in each group completed the study. Patient demographics and stone characteristics were comparable in both groups. Complete disintegration was achieved in 41.7% of patients in group 1 versus 18.8% in group 2 (P = 0.021). Stone-free rate (SFR) was 58.3% and 20.8% in group 1 and 2 respectively (P = 0.001). The mean session time was 56.42 min in group 1 versus 46.35 min in group 2 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Stone disintegration and SFR after the first SWL session are higher when using the alternating bidirectional approach for upper lumbar ureteric stones at the expense of longer procedural duration.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials identifier (ID: NCT03243682), clinicaltrials.gov
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D et al (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127:417–420CrossRef Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D et al (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127:417–420CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Abdel-Khalek M, Sheir KZ, Mokhtar AA et al (2004) Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones: a multivariate analysis model. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38:161–167CrossRef Abdel-Khalek M, Sheir KZ, Mokhtar AA et al (2004) Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones: a multivariate analysis model. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38:161–167CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lechevallier E, Traxer O, Saussine C (2008) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stone. Prog Urol 18:878–885CrossRef Lechevallier E, Traxer O, Saussine C (2008) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stone. Prog Urol 18:878–885CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Al Ansari A, As-Sadiq K, Al-Said S et al (2006) Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol 38:63–67CrossRef Al Ansari A, As-Sadiq K, Al-Said S et al (2006) Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol 38:63–67CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moon KB, Lim GS, Hwang JS et al (2012) Optimal shock wave rate for shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a prospective randomized study Korean. J Urol 11:790–794 Moon KB, Lim GS, Hwang JS et al (2012) Optimal shock wave rate for shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a prospective randomized study Korean. J Urol 11:790–794
6.
go back to reference Sheir KZ, El-Sheikh AM, Ghoneim MA (2001) Synchronous twin-pulse technique to improve efficacy of SWL: preliminary results of an experimental study. J Endourol 15:965–974CrossRef Sheir KZ, El-Sheikh AM, Ghoneim MA (2001) Synchronous twin-pulse technique to improve efficacy of SWL: preliminary results of an experimental study. J Endourol 15:965–974CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Greenstein A, Sofer M, Matzkin H (2004) Efficacy of the Duet lithotripter using two energy sources for stone fragmentation by shockwaves: an in vitro study. J Endourol 18:942–945CrossRef Greenstein A, Sofer M, Matzkin H (2004) Efficacy of the Duet lithotripter using two energy sources for stone fragmentation by shockwaves: an in vitro study. J Endourol 18:942–945CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sheir KZ, El-Diasty TA, Ismail AM (2005) Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: the first prospective clinical study. BJU Int 95:389–393CrossRef Sheir KZ, El-Diasty TA, Ismail AM (2005) Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: the first prospective clinical study. BJU Int 95:389–393CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 23:478–480CrossRef Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 23:478–480CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Li XD, Wu YP, Wei Y et al (2018) Predictors of recoverability of renal function after pyeloplasty in adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urol Int 100:209–215CrossRef Li XD, Wu YP, Wei Y et al (2018) Predictors of recoverability of renal function after pyeloplasty in adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urol Int 100:209–215CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American urological association/endourological society guideline. PART I J Urol 196:1153–1160CrossRef Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American urological association/endourological society guideline. PART I J Urol 196:1153–1160CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zomorrodi A, Elahian A, Ghorbani N, Tavoosi A (2006) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prone and supine positions for patients with upper ureteral calculi. Urol J 3:130–133PubMed Zomorrodi A, Elahian A, Ghorbani N, Tavoosi A (2006) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prone and supine positions for patients with upper ureteral calculi. Urol J 3:130–133PubMed
13.
go back to reference Goktas S, Peskircioglu L, Tahmaz L et al (2000) Is there significance of the choice of prone versus supine position in the treatment of proximal ureter stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? Eur Urol 38:618–620CrossRef Goktas S, Peskircioglu L, Tahmaz L et al (2000) Is there significance of the choice of prone versus supine position in the treatment of proximal ureter stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? Eur Urol 38:618–620CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sheir KZ, Elhalwagy SM, Abo-Elghar ME et al (2008) Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized study of effectiveness and safety in comparison to standard single-pulse technique. BJU Int 101:1420–1426CrossRef Sheir KZ, Elhalwagy SM, Abo-Elghar ME et al (2008) Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized study of effectiveness and safety in comparison to standard single-pulse technique. BJU Int 101:1420–1426CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The alternating bidirectional versus the standard approach during shock wave lithotripsy for upper lumbar ureteric stones: a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Mohammed Hegazy
Ahmed El-Assmy
Bedeir Ali-El-Dein
Khaled Z. Sheir
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords
Shock
Shock
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03148-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

World Journal of Urology 1/2021 Go to the issue