Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2013

Open Access 01-11-2013 | Brief Report

Prospective clinical experience with research biopsies in breast cancer patients

Authors: Ines Vaz-Luis, Catherine A. Zeghibe, Elizabeth S. Frank, Jessica Sohl, Kimberly E. Washington, Stuart G. Silverman, Joseph M. Fonte, Erica L. Mayer, Beth A. Overmoyer, Andrea L. Richardson, Ian E. Krop, Eric P. Winer, Nancy U. Lin

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

There are ethical concerns regarding the performance of biopsies in patients for research purposes. We examined our single-institution experience regarding acceptance, safety, and success rate with research biopsies in patients with breast cancer. Among patients with data from paired samples, receptor status agreement between primary and metastatic samples was examined, either on first recurrence or after progression on one or more lines of therapy. An IRB-approved prospective study at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute collects research biopsies as additional passes at the time of a clinical biopsy (AB, additional biopsy) or as a separate procedure for banking purposes (RPOB, research purposes only biopsy). Biopsies are not linked to a specific therapeutic or correlative trial. Grade 2–5 adverse events are prospectively collected. 151 patients were included in the analytic cohort (total procedures = 161); 80.8 % underwent AB, 17.2 % underwent RPOB, and 2.0 % underwent both AB and RPOB. Most patients were white (88.7 %) with a performance status of 0–1 (94.0 %). 96.0 % of patients underwent a biopsy in the setting of known or suspected metastatic disease. Receptor status between primary cancer and recurrent research biopsies differed in 43.2 % of patients with available data (18.8 % among patients who underwent the research biopsy before any systemic treatment, 48.1 % after treatment). Tissue was successfully collected in 92.3 % of patients undergoing AB and 100 % patients undergoing RPOB. Only three (2.0 %) patients had adverse events ≥grade-2: one grade-2 pain; one grade-2 pneumothorax; and one grade-3 pain. Our experience suggests research biopsies can be performed safely with a high rate of successful tissue collection. Consistent with previous reports we found a high rate of discordance between primary and metastatic samples, which was even higher among treated patients. This supports continued efforts to study tissue samples at multiple points in a patient’s disease course.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peppercorn J, Shapira I, Collyar D, Deshields T, Lin N, Krop I, Grunwald H, Friedman P, Partridge AH, Schilsky RL, Bertagnolli MM (2010) Ethics of mandatory research biopsy for correlative end points within clinical trials in oncology. J Clin Oncol 28(15):2635–2640. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.27.2443 PubMedCrossRef Peppercorn J, Shapira I, Collyar D, Deshields T, Lin N, Krop I, Grunwald H, Friedman P, Partridge AH, Schilsky RL, Bertagnolli MM (2010) Ethics of mandatory research biopsy for correlative end points within clinical trials in oncology. J Clin Oncol 28(15):2635–2640. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2009.​27.​2443 PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kodish E, Stocking C, Ratain MJ, Kohrman A, Siegler M (1992) Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons. J Clin Oncol 10(11):1810–1816PubMed Kodish E, Stocking C, Ratain MJ, Kohrman A, Siegler M (1992) Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons. J Clin Oncol 10(11):1810–1816PubMed
5.
go back to reference Daugherty C, Ratain MJ, Grochowski E, Stocking C, Kodish E, Mick R, Siegler M (1995) Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol 13(5):1062–1072PubMed Daugherty C, Ratain MJ, Grochowski E, Stocking C, Kodish E, Mick R, Siegler M (1995) Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol 13(5):1062–1072PubMed
6.
go back to reference Seah DS, Scott SM, Najita J, Openshaw T, Krag K, Frank E, Sohl J, Stadler ZK, Garrett M, Silverman SG, Peppercorn J, Winer EP, Come SE, Lin NU (2013) Attitudes of patients with metastatic breast cancer toward research biopsies. Ann Oncol. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt067 Seah DS, Scott SM, Najita J, Openshaw T, Krag K, Frank E, Sohl J, Stadler ZK, Garrett M, Silverman SG, Peppercorn J, Winer EP, Come SE, Lin NU (2013) Attitudes of patients with metastatic breast cancer toward research biopsies. Ann Oncol. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdt067
7.
go back to reference Pentz RD, Xu Z, Lonial S, Kauh JS, O’Regan RM, Waller EK, Shin DM, Fu H, Khuri F (2008) Research participants’ views of nontherapeutic biopsies. ASCO Meet Abstr 26(15):13529 Pentz RD, Xu Z, Lonial S, Kauh JS, O’Regan RM, Waller EK, Shin DM, Fu H, Khuri F (2008) Research participants’ views of nontherapeutic biopsies. ASCO Meet Abstr 26(15):13529
8.
go back to reference Dowlati A, Haaga J, Remick SC, Spiro TP, Gerson SL, Liu L, Berger SJ, Berger NA, Willson JK (2001) Sequential tumor biopsies in early phase clinical trials of anticancer agents for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Clin Cancer Res 7(10):2971–2976PubMed Dowlati A, Haaga J, Remick SC, Spiro TP, Gerson SL, Liu L, Berger SJ, Berger NA, Willson JK (2001) Sequential tumor biopsies in early phase clinical trials of anticancer agents for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Clin Cancer Res 7(10):2971–2976PubMed
9.
go back to reference Brown AP, Wendler DS, Camphausen KA, Miller FG, Citrin D (2008) Performing nondiagnostic research biopsies in irradiated tissue: a review of scientific, clinical, and ethical considerations. J Clin Oncol 26(24):3987–3994. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.16.9896 PubMedCrossRef Brown AP, Wendler DS, Camphausen KA, Miller FG, Citrin D (2008) Performing nondiagnostic research biopsies in irradiated tissue: a review of scientific, clinical, and ethical considerations. J Clin Oncol 26(24):3987–3994. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2008.​16.​9896 PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gomez-Roca CA, Lacroix L, Massard C, De Baere T, Deschamps F, Pramod R, Bahleda R, Deutsch E, Bourgier C, Angevin E, Lazar V, Ribrag V, Koscielny S, Chami L, Lassau N, Dromain C, Robert C, Routier E, Armand JP, Soria JC (2012) Sequential research-related biopsies in phase I trials: acceptance, feasibility and safety. Ann Oncol 23(5):1301–1306. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr383 PubMedCrossRef Gomez-Roca CA, Lacroix L, Massard C, De Baere T, Deschamps F, Pramod R, Bahleda R, Deutsch E, Bourgier C, Angevin E, Lazar V, Ribrag V, Koscielny S, Chami L, Lassau N, Dromain C, Robert C, Routier E, Armand JP, Soria JC (2012) Sequential research-related biopsies in phase I trials: acceptance, feasibility and safety. Ann Oncol 23(5):1301–1306. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdr383 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference El-Osta H, Hong D, Wheler J, Fu S, Naing A, Falchook G, Hicks M, Wen S, Tsimberidou AM, Kurzrock R (2011) Outcomes of research biopsies in phase I clinical trials: the MD Anderson cancer center experience. Oncologist 16(9):1292–1298. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0043 PubMedCrossRef El-Osta H, Hong D, Wheler J, Fu S, Naing A, Falchook G, Hicks M, Wen S, Tsimberidou AM, Kurzrock R (2011) Outcomes of research biopsies in phase I clinical trials: the MD Anderson cancer center experience. Oncologist 16(9):1292–1298. doi:10.​1634/​theoncologist.​2011-0043 PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–655PubMedCrossRef Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–655PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wagle N, Emery C, Berger MF, Davis MJ, Sawyer A, Pochanard P, Kehoe SM, Johannessen CM, Macconaill LE, Hahn WC, Meyerson M, Garraway LA (2011) Dissecting therapeutic resistance to RAF inhibition in melanoma by tumor genomic profiling. J Clin Oncol 29(22):3085–3096. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.33.2312 PubMedCrossRef Wagle N, Emery C, Berger MF, Davis MJ, Sawyer A, Pochanard P, Kehoe SM, Johannessen CM, Macconaill LE, Hahn WC, Meyerson M, Garraway LA (2011) Dissecting therapeutic resistance to RAF inhibition in melanoma by tumor genomic profiling. J Clin Oncol 29(22):3085–3096. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2010.​33.​2312 PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C (2000) What makes clinical research ethical? J Am Med Assoc 283(20):2701–2711CrossRef Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C (2000) What makes clinical research ethical? J Am Med Assoc 283(20):2701–2711CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prospective clinical experience with research biopsies in breast cancer patients
Authors
Ines Vaz-Luis
Catherine A. Zeghibe
Elizabeth S. Frank
Jessica Sohl
Kimberly E. Washington
Stuart G. Silverman
Joseph M. Fonte
Erica L. Mayer
Beth A. Overmoyer
Andrea L. Richardson
Ian E. Krop
Eric P. Winer
Nancy U. Lin
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2717-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine