Top

Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Published in:

01-09-2013 | Original Article

Prospective clinical comparisons of semitendinosus versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Authors: Yusuke Inagaki, Eiji Kondo, Nobuto Kitamura, Jun Onodera, Tomonori Yagi, Yasuhito Tanaka, Kazunori Yasuda

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science | Issue 5/2013

Abstract

Background

The data available from the previously reported clinical studies remains insufficient concerning the hamstring graft preparation in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Objective

To test the hypothesis that there are no significant differences between the semitendinosus tendon alone and the semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft fashioning techniques concerning knee stability and clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Methods

A prospective study was performed on 120 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction according to the graft fashioning technique. The authors developed the protocol to use hamstring tendon autografts. When the harvested doubled semitendinosus tendon is thicker than 6 mm, each half of the semitendinosus tendon is doubled and used for the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundle grafts (Group I). On the other hand, when the harvested semitendinosus tendon is under 6 mm in thickness, the gracilis tendon is harvested additionally. The distal half of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons are doubled and used for the AM bundle graft, and the remaining proximal half of the semitendinosus tendon is doubled and used for the PL bundle grafts (Group II). Sixty-one patients were included in Group I, and 59 patients in Group II. The two groups were compared concerning knee stability and clinical outcome 2 years after surgery.

Results

The postoperative side-to-side anterior laxity averaged 1.3 mm in both groups, showing no statistical difference. There were also no significant differences between the two groups concerning the peak isokinetic torque of the quadriceps and the hamstrings, the Lysholm knee score, and the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation.

Conclusion

There were no significant differences between the two graft fashioning techniques after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction concerning knee stability and postoperative outcome. The present study provided orthopedic surgeons with important information on double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons.

Level of evidence

Level II; prospective comparative study.

Amis AA, Dawkins GPC. Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament: fiber bundle actions related to ligament replacement and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:260–7.PubMed

Sakane M, Fox RJ, Woo SL, Livesay GA, Li G, Fu FH. In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res. 1997;15:285–93.PubMedCrossRef

Mott HW. Semitendinosus anatomic reconstruction for cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;172:90–2.PubMed

Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Kitamura N, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H, Minami A. Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:1015–25.PubMedCrossRef

Aglietti P, Giron F, Cuomo P, Losco M, Mondanelli N. Single-and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:108–13.PubMedCrossRef

Järvela T. Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:500–7.PubMedCrossRef

Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA. Biomechanical comparisons of knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between two clinically available trans-tibial procedures: anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1349–58.PubMedCrossRef

Kondo E, Yasuda K. Second-look arthroscopic evaluations of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: relation with prospective knee stability. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1198–209.PubMedCrossRef

Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T. Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1675–87.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Kondo E, Yasuda K, Miyatake S, Kitamura N, Tohyama H, Yagi T. Clinical comparison of two suspensory fixation devices for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1261–7.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:100–7.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:660–6.PubMed

13.

Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H. Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:240–51.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Hamner DL, Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Hayes WC. Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomedical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:549–57.PubMed

15.

Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Ohkoshi Y, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K. Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:706–14.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K. Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Autogenous doubled hamstring tendons connected in series with polyester tapes. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:99–106.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Miyata K, Yasuda K, Kondo E, Nakano H, Kimura S, Hara N. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament: reconstruction procedures with flexor tendon graft. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5:585–92.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Numazaki H, Tohyama H, Nakano H, Kikuchi S, Yasuda K. The effect of initial graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the mechanical behaviors of the femur-graft-tibia complex during cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:800–5.PubMed

19.

Yamanaka M, Yasuda K, Tohyama H, Nakano H, Wada T. The effect of cyclic displacement on the biomechanical characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:772–7.PubMed

20.

Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Hakozaki A, Kanagawa H, Toyama Y, Suda Y. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis tendon graft: a comparative study with 2-year follow-up results of semitendinosus tendon grafts alone or semitendinosus-gracilis tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:1242–51.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Zhao J, He Y, Wang J. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four versus eight strands of hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:766–70.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Ferrari JD, Ferrari DA. The semitendinosus: anatomic considerations in tendon harvesting. Orthop Rev. 1991;20:1085–8.PubMed

23.

Tohyama H, Kondo E, Hayashi R, Kitamura N, Yasuda K. Gender-based differences in outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1849–57.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Li B. Concerns about double-bundle reconstruction with 8-strand hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:969.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Shelbourne KD, Urch SE, Gray T, Freeman H. Loss of normal knee motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with radiographic arthritic changes after surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:108–13.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M, Suzuki D, Nagano A. Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:787–92.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Mochizuki T, Muneta T, Nagase T, Shirasawa S, Akita K, Sekiya I. Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:356–61.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Edwards A, Bull AMJ, Amis AA. The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament part 2: femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:29–36.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Sakai Y, Kuriwaka M, Fujihara A. Harvesting hamstring tendons for ACL reconstruction influences postoperative hamstring muscle performance. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123:460–5.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Hamstring strength recovery after hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between graft types. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:462–9.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Gobbi A, Domzalski M, Pascual J, Zanazzo M. Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is it necessary to sacrifice the gracilis? Arthroscopy. 2005;21:275–80.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S, Kitaguchi T, Tagami M, Mitsuoka T, Toritsuka Y, Hamada M, Shino K. Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:598–602.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Segawa H, Omori G, Koga Y, Kameo T, Iida S, Tanaka M. Rotational muscle strength of the limb after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendon. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:177–82.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Tashiro T, Kurosawa H, Kawakami A, Hikita A, Fukui N. Influence of medial hamstring tendon harvest on knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, a detailed evaluation with comparison of single- and double-tendon harvest. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:522–9.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Prospective clinical comparisons of semitendinosus versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Authors: Yusuke Inagaki
Eiji Kondo
Nobuto Kitamura
Jun Onodera
Tomonori Yagi
Yasuhito Tanaka
Kazunori Yasuda
Publication date: 01-09-2013
Publisher: Springer Japan
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0949-2658
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0427-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Prospective clinical comparisons of semitendinosus versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Early diagnosis of impending femoral insufficiency fractures by use of MRI: case report and review of the literature

Change with increasing age in control of the lower limbs during jump–landing in adolescents: a 5-year prospective study

Clinical and anatomical study of the distally based lesser saphenous veno-lateral sural neurocutaneous flap for lower extremity coverage

Pleasure of discovery: why we love research

Anatomical considerations for reconstruction of the Lisfranc ligament

Factors influencing the residual rib hump after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 curves