Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science 5/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Article

Factors influencing the residual rib hump after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 curves

Authors: Keijiro Mukaiyama, Jun Takahashi, Hiroki Hirabayashi, Nobuhide Ogihara, Shugo Kuraishi, Masayuki Shimizu, Hiroyuki Kato

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite remarkable improvement in Cobb angle after surgery for scoliosis, many patients have a residual rib hump. We studied the factors responsible for this hump and their influence on patient satisfaction.

Methods

We recruited 2 men and 38 women (mean age 14.9 years) who underwent skip pedicle screw fixation combined with direct vertebral body derotation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke type 1 and 2 curves. Hump size was evaluated by measuring apical trunk rotation (ATR). Patients with postoperative ATR ≤10° were categorized as group A and those with postoperative ATR >10° as group B. We analyzed postoperative self-image and satisfaction subscores of the SRS-22 questionnaire. We also compared the rate of postoperative improvement in ATR between patients who underwent additional Ponte osteotomy and those who did not.

Results

Preoperative ATR, preoperative apical translation, and preoperative and postoperative apical rotation significantly differed between groups A and B. In contrast, Cobb angles before and after surgery, Cobb angle correction rates, apical translation after correction, and postoperative self-image and satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the rate of improvement in ATR showed a strong correlation with self-image (correlation coefficient 0.64) and satisfaction (correlation coefficient 0.52). This improvement rate did not differ significantly between subjects who underwent additional Ponte osteotomy and those who did not.

Conclusions

Preoperative apical rotation and ATR were clearly related to postoperative residual hump. For decreasing the postoperative rib hump, removal of the deformation by apical rotation was considered more important than correction of Cobb angle. Patient satisfaction and self-image scores were not significantly related to postoperative residual hump size, but they were influenced by improvement in ATR.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER. Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004;29:343–9.PubMedCrossRef Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER. Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004;29:343–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Geissele AE, Ogilvie JW, Cohen M, Bradford DS. Thoracoplasty for the treatment of rib prominence in thoracic scoliosis. Spine. 1994;19:1636–42.PubMedCrossRef Geissele AE, Ogilvie JW, Cohen M, Bradford DS. Thoracoplasty for the treatment of rib prominence in thoracic scoliosis. Spine. 1994;19:1636–42.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Aaro S, Dahlborn M. The effect of Harrington instrumentation on the longitudinal axis rotation of the apical vertebra and on the spinal and rib-cage deformity in idiopathic scoliosis studied by computer tomography. Spine. 1982;7:456–62.PubMedCrossRef Aaro S, Dahlborn M. The effect of Harrington instrumentation on the longitudinal axis rotation of the apical vertebra and on the spinal and rib-cage deformity in idiopathic scoliosis studied by computer tomography. Spine. 1982;7:456–62.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thulbourne T, Gillespie R. The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976;58:64–71.PubMed Thulbourne T, Gillespie R. The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976;58:64–71.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Weatherley CR, Draycott V, O’Brien JF, Benson DR, Gopalakrishnan KC, Evans JH, O’Brien JP. The rib deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective study to evaluate changes after Harrington distraction and posterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:179–82.PubMed Weatherley CR, Draycott V, O’Brien JF, Benson DR, Gopalakrishnan KC, Evans JH, O’Brien JP. The rib deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective study to evaluate changes after Harrington distraction and posterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:179–82.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Chung YJ, Park YB. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1995;20:1399–405.PubMed Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Chung YJ, Park YB. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1995;20:1399–405.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Suk SI, Lee CK, Min HJ, Cho KH, Oh JH. Comparison of Cotrel–Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop. 1994;18:341–6.PubMedCrossRef Suk SI, Lee CK, Min HJ, Cho KH, Oh JH. Comparison of Cotrel–Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop. 1994;18:341–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Kamath G, Peelle MW, Bridwell KH. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine. 2006;31:2400–4.PubMedCrossRef Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Kamath G, Peelle MW, Bridwell KH. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine. 2006;31:2400–4.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Karatoprak O, Unay K, Tezer M, Ozturk C, Aydogan M, Mirzanli C. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Int Orthop. 2008;32:523–8 (discussion 9). Karatoprak O, Unay K, Tezer M, Ozturk C, Aydogan M, Mirzanli C. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Int Orthop. 2008;32:523–8 (discussion 9).
10.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Blanke K. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004;29:2040–8.PubMedCrossRef Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Blanke K. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004;29:2040–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, Bridwell KH, Cho SK, Chen G, Sides B. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2006;31:291–8.PubMedCrossRef Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, Bridwell KH, Cho SK, Chen G, Sides B. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2006;31:291–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Liljenqvist U, Hackenberg L, Link T, Halm H. Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Belg. 2001;67:157–63.PubMed Liljenqvist U, Hackenberg L, Link T, Halm H. Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Belg. 2001;67:157–63.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Schootman M. Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary? Spine. 2005;30:2061–7.PubMedCrossRef Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Schootman M. Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary? Spine. 2005;30:2061–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shufflebarger HL, Smiley K, Roth HJ. Internal thoracoplasty. A new procedure. Spine. 1994;19:840–2.PubMedCrossRef Shufflebarger HL, Smiley K, Roth HJ. Internal thoracoplasty. A new procedure. Spine. 1994;19:840–2.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Steel HH. Rib resection and spine fusion in correction of convex deformity in scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:920–5.PubMed Steel HH. Rib resection and spine fusion in correction of convex deformity in scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:920–5.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Theologis TN, Jefferson RJ, Simpson AH, Turner-Smith AR, Fairbank JC. Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1993;18:909–12.PubMedCrossRef Theologis TN, Jefferson RJ, Simpson AH, Turner-Smith AR, Fairbank JC. Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1993;18:909–12.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Asghar J, Samdani AF, Pahys JM, D’Andrea LP, Guille JT, Clements DH, Betz RR. Computed tomography evaluation of rotation correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of an all pedicle screw construct versus a hook-rod system. Spine. 2009;34:804–7.PubMedCrossRef Asghar J, Samdani AF, Pahys JM, D’Andrea LP, Guille JT, Clements DH, Betz RR. Computed tomography evaluation of rotation correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of an all pedicle screw construct versus a hook-rod system. Spine. 2009;34:804–7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kadoury S, Cheriet F, Beausejour M, Stokes IA, Parent S, Labelle H. A three-dimensional retrospective analysis of the evolution of spinal instrumentation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:23–37.PubMedCrossRef Kadoury S, Cheriet F, Beausejour M, Stokes IA, Parent S, Labelle H. A three-dimensional retrospective analysis of the evolution of spinal instrumentation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:23–37.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Takahashi J, Hirabayashi H, Hashidate H, Ogihara N, Kato H. Accuracy of multilevel registration in image-guided pedicle screw insertion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2010;35:347–52.PubMedCrossRef Takahashi J, Hirabayashi H, Hashidate H, Ogihara N, Kato H. Accuracy of multilevel registration in image-guided pedicle screw insertion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2010;35:347–52.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ho EK, Upadhyay SS, Chan FL, Hsu LC, Leong JC. New methods of measuring vertebral rotation from computed tomographic scans. An intraobserver and interobserver study on girls with scoliosis. Spine. 1993;18:1173–7.PubMedCrossRef Ho EK, Upadhyay SS, Chan FL, Hsu LC, Leong JC. New methods of measuring vertebral rotation from computed tomographic scans. An intraobserver and interobserver study on girls with scoliosis. Spine. 1993;18:1173–7.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ponte A. Posterior column shortening for Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Surgical techniques for the spine. 1st ed; 2003. p. 107–13. Ponte A. Posterior column shortening for Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Surgical techniques for the spine. 1st ed; 2003. p. 107–13.
22.
go back to reference Quan GM, Gibson MJ. Correction of main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does higher implant density improve correction? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:562–7.CrossRef Quan GM, Gibson MJ. Correction of main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does higher implant density improve correction? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:562–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Harvey CJ Jr, Betz RR, Clements DH, Huss GK, Clancy M. Are there indications for partial rib resection in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation? Spine. 1993;18:1593–8.PubMedCrossRef Harvey CJ Jr, Betz RR, Clements DH, Huss GK, Clancy M. Are there indications for partial rib resection in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation? Spine. 1993;18:1593–8.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Samdani AF, Hwang SW, Miyanji F, Lonner B, Marks MC, Sponseller PD, Newton PO, Cahill PJ, Shufflebarger HL, Betz RR. Direct vertebral body derotation, thoracoplasty or both: which is better with respect to inclinometer and SRS-22 scores? Spine. 2012;37:E849–53.PubMedCrossRef Samdani AF, Hwang SW, Miyanji F, Lonner B, Marks MC, Sponseller PD, Newton PO, Cahill PJ, Shufflebarger HL, Betz RR. Direct vertebral body derotation, thoracoplasty or both: which is better with respect to inclinometer and SRS-22 scores? Spine. 2012;37:E849–53.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Lonner B, Miyanji F, Stanton P, Marks MC, Bastrom T, Newton PO, Betz RR, Cahill PJ. Impact of direct vertebral body derotation on rib prominence: are preoperative factors predictive of changes in rib prominence? Spine. 2012;37:E86–9.PubMedCrossRef Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Lonner B, Miyanji F, Stanton P, Marks MC, Bastrom T, Newton PO, Betz RR, Cahill PJ. Impact of direct vertebral body derotation on rib prominence: are preoperative factors predictive of changes in rib prominence? Spine. 2012;37:E86–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors influencing the residual rib hump after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 curves
Authors
Keijiro Mukaiyama
Jun Takahashi
Hiroki Hirabayashi
Nobuhide Ogihara
Shugo Kuraishi
Masayuki Shimizu
Hiroyuki Kato
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Science / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0949-2658
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0424-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Journal of Orthopaedic Science 5/2013 Go to the issue