Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Propranolol | Review

Acupuncture versus propranolol in migraine prophylaxis: an indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis

Authors: Yao-Yao Chen, Juan Li, Min Chen, Ling Yue, Tian-Wei She, Hui Zheng

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Propranolol is recommended as first-line treatment for preventing migraine attacks; acupuncture has not been compared with propranolol in a head-to-head trial.

Objective

To compare acupuncture with propranolol using indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Method

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture or propranolol with sham acupuncture, placebo, waiting-list control or usual care were included. We extracted information from the included trials using a standardized extraction form. The primary outcome was migraine episodes. The secondary outcomes included migraine days, migraine frequency, and adverse events.

Results

We included 19 RCTs (n = 3656) after screening 1078 articles. The analysis showed that acupuncture had a significant advantage over propranolol in reducing migraine episodes over a 4-week period (SMD − 0.74, 95% CI − 1.04 to − 0.44). Acupuncture also had a significant advantage over waiting-list control in decreasing migraine frequency (SMD − 1.57, 95% CI − 2.08 to − 1.06). Acupuncture caused fewer adverse events than propranolol (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.11–5.94).

Conclusions

Acupuncture had a better effect than propranolol in reducing migraine episodes in indirect comparison. The result should be confirmed in subsequent head-to-head studies.
Registration: PROSPERO CRD42018108585
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Vo P, Fang J, Bilitou A, Laflamme AK, Gupta S. Patients’ perspective on the burden of migraine in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis of survey data in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. J Headache Pain 2018;19. doi:10.1186/s10194-018-0907-6. Vo P, Fang J, Bilitou A, Laflamme AK, Gupta S. Patients’ perspective on the burden of migraine in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis of survey data in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. J Headache Pain 2018;19. doi:10.1186/s10194-018-0907-6.
6.
go back to reference Carville S, Padhi S, Reason T, Underwood M, Guideline Development Group. Diagnosis and management of headaches in young people and adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2012;345:e5765. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5765.CrossRef Carville S, Padhi S, Reason T, Underwood M, Guideline Development Group. Diagnosis and management of headaches in young people and adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2012;345:e5765. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5765.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nadelmann JW, Phil M, Stevens J, Saper JR (1986) Propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine. Headache 26:175–182CrossRef Nadelmann JW, Phil M, Stevens J, Saper JR (1986) Propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine. Headache 26:175–182CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ludin HP (1989) Flunarizine and propranolol in the treatment of migraine. Headache 29:219–224CrossRef Ludin HP (1989) Flunarizine and propranolol in the treatment of migraine. Headache 29:219–224CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gawel MJ, Kreeft J, Nelson RF, Simard D, Arnott WS (1992) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of flunarizine to propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine. Can J Neurol Sci 19:340–345CrossRef Gawel MJ, Kreeft J, Nelson RF, Simard D, Arnott WS (1992) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of flunarizine to propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine. Can J Neurol Sci 19:340–345CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Holroyd KA, Penzien DB, Cordingley GE (1991) Propranolol in the management of recurrent migraine: a meta-analytic review. Headache 31:333–340CrossRef Holroyd KA, Penzien DB, Cordingley GE (1991) Propranolol in the management of recurrent migraine: a meta-analytic review. Headache 31:333–340CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Linde K, Allais G, Brinkhaus B, Fei Y, Mehring M, Vertosick EA, et al. Acupuncture for the prevention of episodic migraine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016:CD001218. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001218.pub3. Linde K, Allais G, Brinkhaus B, Fei Y, Mehring M, Vertosick EA, et al. Acupuncture for the prevention of episodic migraine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016:CD001218. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001218.pub3.
17.
go back to reference Xu J, Zhang FQ, Pei J, Ji J. Acupuncture for migraine without aura: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Integr Med 2018. Xu J, Zhang FQ, Pei J, Ji J. Acupuncture for migraine without aura: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Integr Med 2018.
23.
go back to reference Tfelt-Hansen P, Block G, Dahlöf C, Diener HC, Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition. Cephalalgia 2000;20:765–86. doi:10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00117.x. Tfelt-Hansen P, Block G, Dahlöf C, Diener HC, Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition. Cephalalgia 2000;20:765–86. doi:10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00117.x.
24.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1311–6. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004.CrossRef Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1311–6. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Streng A, Linde K, Hoppe A, Pfaffenrath V, Hammes M, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of acupuncture compared with metoprolol in migraine prophylaxis. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain 2006;46:1492–502. doi:10.1111/j.1526–4610.2006.00598.x. Streng A, Linde K, Hoppe A, Pfaffenrath V, Hammes M, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of acupuncture compared with metoprolol in migraine prophylaxis. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain 2006;46:1492–502. doi:10.1111/j.1526–4610.2006.00598.x.
34.
go back to reference Melchart D, Thormaehlen J, Hager S, Liao J, Linde K, Weidenhammer W (2003) Acupuncture versus placebo versus sumatriptan for early treatment of migraine attacks: a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med 253:181–188CrossRef Melchart D, Thormaehlen J, Hager S, Liao J, Linde K, Weidenhammer W (2003) Acupuncture versus placebo versus sumatriptan for early treatment of migraine attacks: a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med 253:181–188CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lücking CH, Oestreich W, Schmidt R, Soyka D. Flunarizine vs. propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine: two double-blind comparative studies in more than 400 patients. Cephalalgia 1988;8 Suppl 8:21–6. doi:10.1177/03331024880080S805.CrossRef Lücking CH, Oestreich W, Schmidt R, Soyka D. Flunarizine vs. propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine: two double-blind comparative studies in more than 400 patients. Cephalalgia 1988;8 Suppl 8:21–6. doi:10.1177/03331024880080S805.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bordini CA, Arruda MA, Ciciarelli MC, Speciali JG (1997) Propranolol vs flunarizine vs flunarizine plus propranolol in migraine without aura prophylaxis. A double-blind trial Arq Neuropsiquiatr 55:536–541CrossRef Bordini CA, Arruda MA, Ciciarelli MC, Speciali JG (1997) Propranolol vs flunarizine vs flunarizine plus propranolol in migraine without aura prophylaxis. A double-blind trial Arq Neuropsiquiatr 55:536–541CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Allais G, De Lorenzo C, Quirico PE, Airola G, Tolardo G, Mana O et al (2002) Acupuncture in the prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura: a comparison with flunarizine. Headache 42:855–861CrossRef Allais G, De Lorenzo C, Quirico PE, Airola G, Tolardo G, Mana O et al (2002) Acupuncture in the prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura: a comparison with flunarizine. Headache 42:855–861CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Meissner K, Fässler M, Rücker G, Kleijnen J, Hróbjartsson A, Schneider A et al (2013) Differential effectiveness of placebo treatments: a systematic review of migraine prophylaxis. JAMA Intern Med 173:1941–1951CrossRef Meissner K, Fässler M, Rücker G, Kleijnen J, Hróbjartsson A, Schneider A et al (2013) Differential effectiveness of placebo treatments: a systematic review of migraine prophylaxis. JAMA Intern Med 173:1941–1951CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Wickramasekera I (1980) A conditioned response model of the placebo effect predictions from the model. Biofeedback Self Regul 5:5–18CrossRef Wickramasekera I (1980) A conditioned response model of the placebo effect predictions from the model. Biofeedback Self Regul 5:5–18CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Acupuncture versus propranolol in migraine prophylaxis: an indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis
Authors
Yao-Yao Chen
Juan Li
Min Chen
Ling Yue
Tian-Wei She
Hui Zheng
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09510-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Neurology 1/2020 Go to the issue