Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Propofol | Review

Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Muhammad Hudaib, Hurais Malik, Syeda Javeria Zakir, Samra Rabbani, Dhanushan Gnanendran, Abdul Rehman Shah Syed, Noor Fatima Suri, Javeria Khan, Arham Iqbal, Nowal Hussain, Muhammad Abdullah, Satesh Kumar, Mahima Khatri, Giustino Varrassi

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Propofol has been the gold standard for anesthesia induction and maintenance due to its rapid onset and favorable pharmacokinetic properties. However, the search for alternative agents with improved safety and efficacy has led to the emergence of ciprofol (HSK3486), a structural analog of propofol. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of ciprofol compared to propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance in adult patients undergoing surgical procedures.

Methods

This study included only double-arm RCTs in which participants were aged eighteen or older undergoing surgery. For the statistical analysis of the extracted data, we employed RevMan 5.4.1.

Results

Ciprofol demonstrated a promising trend of higher anesthesiologists’ satisfaction during the induction phase (MD 0.14, 95%, CI − 0.28 to 0.56, p = 0.51), whereas Propofol was favored during maintenance. Propofol also exhibited advantages with a shorter time to successful anesthesia induction (MD 0.08 min, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.15, p = 0.04), and quicker attainment of full alertness (MD 0.11 min, 95% CI − 1.29 to 1.52, p = 0.87), suggesting its efficiency in clinical practice. Importantly, there were no significant disparities in the success rate of anesthesia.

Conclusion

Both ciprofol and propofol demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety for anesthesia induction and maintenance in adult patients undergoing surgery. While propofol provides a faster onset of induction, ciprofol exhibits advantages in terms of pain management. Clinicians should consider these findings when selecting anesthetic agents, and tailoring choices to individual patient needs and clinical scenarios.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference Robinson BJ, Ebert TJ, Obrien TJ, Colinco MD, Muzi M (1997) Mechanisms whereby propofol mediates peripheral vasodilation in humans. Sympathoinhibition or direct vascular relaxation? Anesthesiology 86(1):64–72CrossRefPubMed Robinson BJ, Ebert TJ, Obrien TJ, Colinco MD, Muzi M (1997) Mechanisms whereby propofol mediates peripheral vasodilation in humans. Sympathoinhibition or direct vascular relaxation? Anesthesiology 86(1):64–72CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Teng Y, Ou M, Wang X, Zhang W, Liu X, Liang Y, Li K, Wang Y, Ouyang W, Weng H, Li J, Yao S, Meng J, Shangguan W, Zuo Y, Zhu T, Liu B, Liu J (2021) Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for the sedation/anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy: phase IIa and IIb multi-center clinical trials. Eur J Pharm Sci 164:105904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105904CrossRefPubMed Teng Y, Ou M, Wang X, Zhang W, Liu X, Liang Y, Li K, Wang Y, Ouyang W, Weng H, Li J, Yao S, Meng J, Shangguan W, Zuo Y, Zhu T, Liu B, Liu J (2021) Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for the sedation/anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy: phase IIa and IIb multi-center clinical trials. Eur J Pharm Sci 164:105904. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejps.​2021.​105904CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Teng Y, Ou MC, Wang X et al (2021) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ciprofol emulsion in Chinese subjects: a single center, open-label, single-arm dose-escalation phase 1 study. Am J Transl Res 13(12):13791–13802. Published 2021 Dec 15)PubMedPubMedCentral Teng Y, Ou MC, Wang X et al (2021) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ciprofol emulsion in Chinese subjects: a single center, open-label, single-arm dose-escalation phase 1 study. Am J Transl Res 13(12):13791–13802. Published 2021 Dec 15)PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898CrossRefPubMed Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​l4898CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wang X, Wang X, Liu J, Zuo YX, Zhu QM, Wei XC, Zou XH, Luo AL, Zhang FX, Li YL, Zheng H, Li H, Wang S, Wang DX, Guo QL, Liu CM, Wang YT, Zhu ZQ, Wang GY, Ai YQ, Xu MJ (2022) Effects of ciprofol for the induction of general anesthesia in patients scheduled for elective surgery compared to propofol: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 26(5):1607–1617. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202203_28228CrossRefPubMed Wang X, Wang X, Liu J, Zuo YX, Zhu QM, Wei XC, Zou XH, Luo AL, Zhang FX, Li YL, Zheng H, Li H, Wang S, Wang DX, Guo QL, Liu CM, Wang YT, Zhu ZQ, Wang GY, Ai YQ, Xu MJ (2022) Effects of ciprofol for the induction of general anesthesia in patients scheduled for elective surgery compared to propofol: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 26(5):1607–1617. https://​doi.​org/​10.​26355/​eurrev_​202203_​28228CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zeng Y, Wang DX, Lin ZM, Liu J, Wei XC, Deng J, Liu YF, Ma EL, Yang MC, Zheng H, Yu XD, Guo QL, Guan YJ (2022) Efficacy and safety of HSK3486 for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in elective surgical patients: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, propofol-controlled phase 2 clinical trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 26(4):1114–1124. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202202_28101CrossRefPubMed Zeng Y, Wang DX, Lin ZM, Liu J, Wei XC, Deng J, Liu YF, Ma EL, Yang MC, Zheng H, Yu XD, Guo QL, Guan YJ (2022) Efficacy and safety of HSK3486 for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in elective surgical patients: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, propofol-controlled phase 2 clinical trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 26(4):1114–1124. https://​doi.​org/​10.​26355/​eurrev_​202202_​28101CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Mittelstrass K, Ried J, Yu Z, Krumsiek J, Gieger C, Prehn C, Roemisch-Margl W, Polonikov A, Peters A, Theis F, Meitinger T, Kronenberg F, Weidinger S, Wichmann H, Suhre K, Wang-Sattler R, Adamski J, Illig T (2011) Discovery of sexual dimorphisms in metabolic and genetic biomarkers. PLoS Genet 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002215 Mittelstrass K, Ried J, Yu Z, Krumsiek J, Gieger C, Prehn C, Roemisch-Margl W, Polonikov A, Peters A, Theis F, Meitinger T, Kronenberg F, Weidinger S, Wichmann H, Suhre K, Wang-Sattler R, Adamski J, Illig T (2011) Discovery of sexual dimorphisms in metabolic and genetic biomarkers. PLoS Genet 7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1371/​journal.​pgen.​1002215
26.
go back to reference Li J, Wang X, Liu J, Wang X, Li X, Wang Y, Ouyang W, Li J, Yao S, Zhu Z, Guo Q, Yu Y, Meng J, Zuo Y (2022) Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: a multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 131(2):138–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13761CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li J, Wang X, Liu J, Wang X, Li X, Wang Y, Ouyang W, Li J, Yao S, Zhu Z, Guo Q, Yu Y, Meng J, Zuo Y (2022) Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: a multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 131(2):138–148. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bcpt.​13761CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Karcz M, Papadakos PJ (2013) Respiratory complications in the postanesthesia care unit: a review of pathophysiological mechanisms. Can J Respir Ther 49(4):21–9. PMID: 26078599; PMCID: PMC4456822PubMedPubMedCentral Karcz M, Papadakos PJ (2013) Respiratory complications in the postanesthesia care unit: a review of pathophysiological mechanisms. Can J Respir Ther 49(4):21–9. PMID: 26078599; PMCID: PMC4456822PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Muhammad Hudaib
Hurais Malik
Syeda Javeria Zakir
Samra Rabbani
Dhanushan Gnanendran
Abdul Rehman Shah Syed
Noor Fatima Suri
Javeria Khan
Arham Iqbal
Nowal Hussain
Muhammad Abdullah
Satesh Kumar
Mahima Khatri
Giustino Varrassi
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 2731-3786
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00160-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care 1/2024 Go to the issue