Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Research Paper

Prolonged survival following aggressive treatment for metastatic breast cancer in the spine

Authors: Patricia L. Zadnik, Lee Hwang, Derek G. Ju, Mari L. Groves, Jackson Sui, Alp Yurter, Timothy F. Witham, Ali Bydon, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Ziya L. Gokaslan, Daniel M. Sciubba

Published in: Clinical & Experimental Metastasis | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

In 2007, members of our group reported a 21 month median survival for patients undergoing surgery for metastatic breast cancer in the spinal column. Cervical spine metastases were associated with decreased survival, Estrogen receptor positivity was associated with improved survival, and age and visceral metastases did not significantly impact survival. In the current study, we reassess these variables in the context of modern adjuvant therapies, and investigate the impact of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS). We report an observational cohort of 43 patients undergoing surgical resection for metastatic breast cancer of the spine treated at a single academic institution from June 2002 to August 2011. Patient medical records were reviewed in accordance with policies outlined by the University Institutional Review Board. Median overall survival following surgery for metastatic breast cancer in the spine was 26.8 months. 1 year overall survival was 66 %. 5 year-overall survival was 4 %. Age (p = 0.12), preoperative functional status (p = 0.17), location of metastasis (p = 0.34), the presence of visceral metastases (p = 0.68), and spinal instability (p = 0.81) were not significant variables on survival analysis. Postoperative adjuvant therapy with a single modality (radiation or chemotherapy) was associated with a significantly lower median survival compared to dual therapy with chemotherapy and radiation (p = 0.042). Patients that received radiation and chemotherapy after surgery were younger but demonstrated prolonged median survival versus single modality therapy. This data supports the concept that visceral metastases do not impact survival, however cervical spine lesions were not associated with decreased survival.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Eleraky M, Papanastassiou I, Vrionis FD (2010) Management of metastatic spine disease. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 4(3):182–188PubMedCrossRef Eleraky M, Papanastassiou I, Vrionis FD (2010) Management of metastatic spine disease. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 4(3):182–188PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Medicine DJ, O’Donoghue G, Kerin M (2010) Metastatic breast disease: an all too common cause of back pain. BMJ Case Rep 2010:bcr10.2009.2388. Epub 2010 Jan 13 Medicine DJ, O’Donoghue G, Kerin M (2010) Metastatic breast disease: an all too common cause of back pain. BMJ Case Rep 2010:bcr10.2009.2388. Epub 2010 Jan 13
3.
go back to reference Sciubba DM, Petteys RJ, Dekutoski MB et al (2010) Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease. J Neurosurg Spine 13(1):94–108PubMedCrossRef Sciubba DM, Petteys RJ, Dekutoski MB et al (2010) Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease. J Neurosurg Spine 13(1):94–108PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL, Suk I et al (2007) Positive and negative prognostic variables for patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic breast disease. Eur Spine J 16(10):1659–1667PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL, Suk I et al (2007) Positive and negative prognostic variables for patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic breast disease. Eur Spine J 16(10):1659–1667PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rajpal S, Hwang R, Mroz T et al (2012) Comparing vertebral body reconstruction implants for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar metastatic spinal tumors: a consecutive case series of 37 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(2):85–91PubMedCrossRef Rajpal S, Hwang R, Mroz T et al (2012) Comparing vertebral body reconstruction implants for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar metastatic spinal tumors: a consecutive case series of 37 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(2):85–91PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rose PS, Buchowski JM (2011) Metastatic disease in the thoracic and lumbar spine: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(1):37–48PubMed Rose PS, Buchowski JM (2011) Metastatic disease in the thoracic and lumbar spine: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(1):37–48PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sundaresan N, Rothman A, Manhart K et al (2002) Surgery for solitary metastases of the spine: rationale and results of treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(16):1802–1806CrossRef Sundaresan N, Rothman A, Manhart K et al (2002) Surgery for solitary metastases of the spine: rationale and results of treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(16):1802–1806CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chaichana KL, Pendleton C, Wolinsky JP et al (2009) Vertebral compression fractures in patients presenting with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Neurosurgery 65(2):267–274 discussion 274-5PubMedCrossRef Chaichana KL, Pendleton C, Wolinsky JP et al (2009) Vertebral compression fractures in patients presenting with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Neurosurgery 65(2):267–274 discussion 274-5PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Meyer SA, Singh H, Jenkins AL (2010) Surgical treatment of metastatic spinal tumors. Mt Sinai J Med 77(1):124–129PubMedCrossRef Meyer SA, Singh H, Jenkins AL (2010) Surgical treatment of metastatic spinal tumors. Mt Sinai J Med 77(1):124–129PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC et al (2010) A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(22):E1221–E1229CrossRef Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC et al (2010) A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(22):E1221–E1229CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Findlay GF (1984) Adverse effects of the management of malignant spinal cord compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47(8):761–768PubMedCrossRef Findlay GF (1984) Adverse effects of the management of malignant spinal cord compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47(8):761–768PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Laufer I, Sciubba DM, Madera M et al (2012) Surgical management of metastatic spinal tumors. Cancer Control 19(2):122–128PubMed Laufer I, Sciubba DM, Madera M et al (2012) Surgical management of metastatic spinal tumors. Cancer Control 19(2):122–128PubMed
13.
go back to reference Shehadi JA, Sciubba DM, Suk I et al (2007) Surgical treatment strategies and outcome in patients with breast cancer metastatic to the spine: a review of 87 patients. Eur Spine J 16(8):1179–1192PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Shehadi JA, Sciubba DM, Suk I et al (2007) Surgical treatment strategies and outcome in patients with breast cancer metastatic to the spine: a review of 87 patients. Eur Spine J 16(8):1179–1192PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Quan GM, Vital JM, Aurouer N et al (2011) Surgery improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with spinal metastases: a prospective study on 118 patients. Eur Spine J 20(11):1970–1978PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Quan GM, Vital JM, Aurouer N et al (2011) Surgery improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with spinal metastases: a prospective study on 118 patients. Eur Spine J 20(11):1970–1978PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cappuccio M, Bandiera S, Babbi L et al (2010) Management of bone metastases. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 14(4):407–414PubMed Cappuccio M, Bandiera S, Babbi L et al (2010) Management of bone metastases. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 14(4):407–414PubMed
16.
go back to reference Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T et al (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(3):298–306CrossRef Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T et al (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(3):298–306CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Walcott BP, Cvetanovich GL, Barnard ZR et al (2011) Surgical treatment and outcomes of metastatic breast cancer to the spine. J Clin Neurosci 18(10):1336–1339PubMedCrossRef Walcott BP, Cvetanovich GL, Barnard ZR et al (2011) Surgical treatment and outcomes of metastatic breast cancer to the spine. J Clin Neurosci 18(10):1336–1339PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF et al (2005) Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 366(9486):643–648PubMedCrossRef Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF et al (2005) Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 366(9486):643–648PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yang SB, Cho W, Chang UK (2012) Analysis of prognostic factors relating to postoperative survival in spinal metastases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 51(3):127–134PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Yang SB, Cho W, Chang UK (2012) Analysis of prognostic factors relating to postoperative survival in spinal metastases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 51(3):127–134PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Majeed H, Kumar S, Bommireddy R et al (2012) Accuracy of prognostic scores in decision making and predicting outcomes in metastatic spine disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94(1):28–33PubMedCrossRef Majeed H, Kumar S, Bommireddy R et al (2012) Accuracy of prognostic scores in decision making and predicting outcomes in metastatic spine disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94(1):28–33PubMedCrossRef
22.
Metadata
Title
Prolonged survival following aggressive treatment for metastatic breast cancer in the spine
Authors
Patricia L. Zadnik
Lee Hwang
Derek G. Ju
Mari L. Groves
Jackson Sui
Alp Yurter
Timothy F. Witham
Ali Bydon
Jean-Paul Wolinsky
Ziya L. Gokaslan
Daniel M. Sciubba
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0262-0898
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-013-9608-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 1/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine