Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Project ACHIEVE – using implementation research to guide the evaluation of transitional care effectiveness

Authors: Jing Li, Jane Brock, Brian Jack, Brian Mittman, Mary Naylor, Joanna Sorra, Glen Mays, Mark V. Williams, for the Project ACHIEVE Team

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Poorly managed hospital discharges and care transitions between health care facilities can cause poor outcomes for both patients and their caregivers. Unfortunately, the usual approach to health care delivery does not support continuity and coordination across the settings of hospital, doctors’ offices, home or nursing homes. Though complex efforts with multiple components can improve patient outcomes and reduce 30-day readmissions, research has not identified which components are necessary. Also we do not know how delivery of core components may need to be adjusted based on patient, caregiver, setting or characteristics of the community, or how system redesign can be accelerated.

Methods/design

Project ACHIEVE focuses on diverse Medicare populations such as individuals with multiple chronic diseases, patients with low health literacy/numeracy and limited English proficiency, racial and ethnic minority groups, low-income groups, residents of rural areas, and individuals with disabilities. During the first phase, we will use focus groups to identify the transitional care outcomes and components that matter most to patients and caregivers to inform development and validation of assessment instruments. During the second phase, we will evaluate the comparative effectiveness of multi-component care transitions programs occurring across the U.S. Using a mixed-methods approach for this evaluation, we will study historical (retrospective) and current and future (prospective) groups of patients, caregivers and providers using site visits, surveys, and clinical and claims data. In this natural experiment observational study, we use a fractional factorial study design to specify comparators and estimate the individual and combined effects of key transitional care components.

Discussion

Our study will determine which evidence-based transitional care components and/or clusters most effectively produce patient and caregiver desired outcomes overall and among diverse patient and caregiver populations in different healthcare settings. Using the results, we will develop concrete, actionable recommendations regarding how best to implement these strategies. Finally, this work will provide tools for hospitals, community-based organizations, patients, caregivers, clinicians and other stakeholders to help them make informed decisions about which strategies are most effective and how best to implement them in their communities.

Trial registration

Registered as NCT02354482 on clinicaltrials.gov on 1/29/2015
Literature
1.
go back to reference Naylor MD, et al. Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 1999;281(7):613–20. Naylor MD, et al. Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 1999;281(7):613–20.
2.
go back to reference Coleman EA, et al. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17):1822–8. Coleman EA, et al. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17):1822–8.
3.
go back to reference Stauffer BD, et al. Effectiveness and cost of a transitional care program for heart failure: a prospective study with concurrent controls. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1238–43. Stauffer BD, et al. Effectiveness and cost of a transitional care program for heart failure: a prospective study with concurrent controls. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1238–43.
4.
go back to reference Voss R, et al. The care transitions intervention: translating from efficacy to effectiveness. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1232–7. Voss R, et al. The care transitions intervention: translating from efficacy to effectiveness. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1232–7.
5.
go back to reference Jack BW, et al. A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(3):178–87. Jack BW, et al. A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(3):178–87.
6.
go back to reference Hansen LO, et al. Project BOOST: Effectiveness of a multihospital effort to reduce rehospitalization. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(8):421–7. Hansen LO, et al. Project BOOST: Effectiveness of a multihospital effort to reduce rehospitalization. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(8):421–7.
7.
go back to reference Coleman EA. Falling through the cracks: challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(4):549–55.CrossRefPubMed Coleman EA. Falling through the cracks: challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(4):549–55.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Greenwald J, Denham C, Jack B. The Hospital Discharge: A Review of a High Risk Care Transition With Highlights of a Reengineered Discharge Process. Journal of Patient Safety. 2007;3(2):97-106. Greenwald J, Denham C, Jack B. The Hospital Discharge: A Review of a High Risk Care Transition With Highlights of a Reengineered Discharge Process. Journal of Patient Safety. 2007;3(2):97-106.
9.
go back to reference Forster AJ, et al. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):161–7. Forster AJ, et al. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):161–7.
10.
go back to reference Anthony D, et al. Patient Safety at Time of Discharge – An Example of a Multifaceted Process Evaluation. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation. Vol. 2, Concepts and methodology. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0021-2. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005. Anthony D, et al. Patient Safety at Time of Discharge – An Example of a Multifaceted Process Evaluation. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation. Vol. 2, Concepts and methodology. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0021-2. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.
11.
go back to reference Coleman EA, Williams MV. Executing high-quality care transitions: a call to do it right. J Hosp Med. 2007;2(5):287–90.CrossRefPubMed Coleman EA, Williams MV. Executing high-quality care transitions: a call to do it right. J Hosp Med. 2007;2(5):287–90.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kripalani S, et al. Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2007;2(5):314–23. Kripalani S, et al. Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2007;2(5):314–23.
13.
go back to reference Ashton CM, et al. The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission: a meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care. 1997;35(10):1044–59. Ashton CM, et al. The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission: a meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care. 1997;35(10):1044–59.
14.
go back to reference van Walraven C, et al. Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2011;183(7):E391–402. van Walraven C, et al. Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2011;183(7):E391–402.
15.
go back to reference Kripalani S, et al. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297(8):831–41. Kripalani S, et al. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297(8):831–41.
16.
go back to reference Konetzka RT, Spector W, Limcangco MR. Reducing hospitalizations from long-term care settings. Med Care Res Rev. 2008;65(1):40–66.CrossRefPubMed Konetzka RT, Spector W, Limcangco MR. Reducing hospitalizations from long-term care settings. Med Care Res Rev. 2008;65(1):40–66.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Naylor M, et al. Comparison of evidence-based interventions on outcomes of hospitalized, cognitively impaired older adults. J Comp Eff Res. 2014;3(3):245-57. Naylor M, et al. Comparison of evidence-based interventions on outcomes of hospitalized, cognitively impaired older adults. J Comp Eff Res. 2014;3(3):245-57.
20.
go back to reference Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care. 1998;7(3):149-58. Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care. 1998;7(3):149-58.
21.
go back to reference Wandersman A, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008; 41(3-4):171-81. Wandersman A, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008; 41(3-4):171-81.
22.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. Damschroder LJ, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
23.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Vogt Tm, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-7. Glasgow RE, Vogt Tm, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-7.
24.
go back to reference Greysen SR, et al. Understanding transitions in care from hospital to homeless shelter: a mixed-methods, community-based participatory approach. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(11):1484–91. Greysen SR, et al. Understanding transitions in care from hospital to homeless shelter: a mixed-methods, community-based participatory approach. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(11):1484–91.
25.
go back to reference Israel BA, et al. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202. Israel BA, et al. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.
26.
go back to reference Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100 Suppl 1:S40–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100 Suppl 1:S40–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1990. p. 53. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1990. p. 53.
29.
go back to reference Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley; 2009. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley; 2009.
31.
go back to reference Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):637-44. Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):637-44.
32.
go back to reference Berkowitz RE, et al. Project ReEngineered Discharge (RED) lowers hospital readmissions of patients discharged from a skilled nursing facility. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(10):736-40. Berkowitz RE, et al. Project ReEngineered Discharge (RED) lowers hospital readmissions of patients discharged from a skilled nursing facility. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(10):736-40.
33.
go back to reference Li J, et al. The physician mentored implementation model: a promising quality improvement framework for health care change. Acad Med. 2015;90(3):303–10. Li J, et al. The physician mentored implementation model: a promising quality improvement framework for health care change. Acad Med. 2015;90(3):303–10.
Metadata
Title
Project ACHIEVE – using implementation research to guide the evaluation of transitional care effectiveness
Authors
Jing Li
Jane Brock
Brian Jack
Brian Mittman
Mary Naylor
Joanna Sorra
Glen Mays
Mark V. Williams
for the Project ACHIEVE Team
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1312-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue