Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

The impact of the World Health Organization 8-steps in wheelchair service provision in wheelchair users in a less resourced setting: a cohort study in Indonesia

Authors: Maria L. Toro, Chika Eke, Jonathan Pearlman

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For people who have a mobility impairment, access to an appropriate wheelchair is an important step towards social inclusion and participation. The World Health Organization Guidelines for the Provision of Manual Wheelchairs in Less Resourced Settings emphasize the eight critical steps for appropriate wheelchair services, which include: referral, assessment, prescription, funding and ordering, product preparation,fitting and adjusting, user training, and follow-up and maintenance/repairs. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the provision of wheelchairs according to the World Health Organization’s service provision process by United Cerebral Palsy Wheels for Humanity in Indonesia affects wheelchair recipients compared to wait-listed controls.

Methods

This study used a convenience sample (N = 344) of Children, Children with proxies, Adults, and Adults with proxies who were on a waiting list to receive a wheelchair as well as those who received one. Interviews were conducted at baseline and a 6 month follow-up to collect the following data: Demographics and wheelchair use questions, the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF, Functional Mobility Assessment, Craig Handicap Assessment Recording Technique Short Form. The Wheelchair Assessment Checklist and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire were administered at follow up only.

Results

167 participants were on the waiting list and 142 received a wheelchair. Physical health domain in the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF improved significantly for women who received a wheelchair (p = 0.044) and environmental health improved significantly for women and men who received a wheelchair as compared to those on the waiting list (p < 0.017). Satisfaction with the mobility device improved significantly for Adults with proxies and Children with proxies as compared to the waiting list (p < 0.022). Only 11 % of Adults who received a wheelchair reported being able to perform a “wheelie”. The condition of Roughrider wheelchairs was significantly better than the condition of kids wheelchairs for Children with proxies as measured by the Wheelchair Assessment Checklist (p = 0.019).

Conclusions

Wheelchair provision according to World Health Organization’s 8-Steps in a less-resourced setting has a range of positive outcomes including increased satisfaction with the mobility device and better quality of life. Wheelchair provision service could be improved by providing more hours of wheelchair skills training. There is a need for outcome measures that are validated across cultures and languages.
Literature
1.
Borg J, Ostergren P-O, Larsson S, Rahman AA, Bari N, Khan AN. Assistive technology use is associated with reduced capability poverty: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(2):112–21.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Nations U. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. New York: United Nations; 2006.
3.
Skempes D, Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Health related rehabilitation and human rights: Analyzing States’ obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(1):163–73.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman L, Scherer J. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(21):1321–31.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Lenker JA, Paquet VL. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol. 2003;15(1):1–15.CrossRefPubMed
7.
World Health Organization. The International Spinal Cord Society. International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.
8.
Ripat JD, Woodgate RL. The role of assistive technology in self-perceived participation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012;35(2):170–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
World Health Organization. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings. 2008.
10.
World Health Organization. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
11.
Borg J, Larsson S, Östergren PO. The right to assistive technology: for whom, for what, and by whom? Disability Society. 2011;26(2):151–67.CrossRef
12.
World Health Organization. World report on disability. 2011.
13.
Adya M, Samant D, Scherer MJ, Killeen M, Morris MW. Assistive/rehabilitation technology, disability, and service delivery models. Cogn Process. 2012;13(1):75–8.CrossRef
14.
Winter AG. Assessment of wheelchair technology in Tanzania. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship. 2006;2(1):60-77.
15.
Borg J, Östergren P-O. Users’ perspectives on the provision of assistive technologies in Bangladesh: awareness, providers, costs and barriers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(4):1–8.CrossRef
16.
Hotchkiss R. Independence through mobility: a guide through the manufacture of the AT-Hotchkiss wheelchair. Washington D.C.: Appropriate Technology International; 1985.
17.
18.
Pearlman J, Cooper R, Zipfel E, Cooper R, McCartney M. Towards the development of an effective technology transfer model of wheelchairs to developing countries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1(1):103–10.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Krizack M. It’s not about wheelchairs. In: Heinicke-Motsch K, Sygall S, editors. Building an inclusive development community: A manual on including people with disabilities in international development programs. Eugene: Mobility International USA (MIUSA); 2003.
20.
Mines R. Wheelchair Postural Support Solutions for Low-Income Countries. Ergon Des. 2008;16(4):4–28.
21.
Armstrong W, Reisinger KD, Smith WK. Evaluation of CIR-Whirlwind Wheelchair and service provision in Afghanistan. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(11–12):935–48.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Pearlman J, Cooper R, Krizack M, Lindsley A, Wu Y, Reisinger K, et al. Lower-Limb Protheses and wheelchairs in low income countries: An overview. IEEE-EMBS Magazine. 2008;27(2):12–22.
23.
Mukherjee G, Samanta A. Wheelchair charity: a useless benevolence in community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(10):591–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Toro ML, Garcia-Mendez Y, Dausey D, Pearlman J, editors. Comparison of a manual wheelchair designed and produced in Mexico to a wheelchair produced in China based on ISO testing and clinician and user feedback. RESNA Annual Conference; 2012; Baltimore, MD.
25.
Borg J, Larsson S, Östergren P-O, Rahman AA, Bari N, Khan AN. User involvement in service delivery predicts outcomes of assistive technology use: A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):330.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Guimaraes E, Mann WC. Evaluation of pressure and durability of a low-cost wheelchair cushion designed for developing countries. Int J Rehabil Res. 2003;26(2):141–3.CrossRefPubMed
27.
World Health Organization, United States Agency for International Development. Joint position paper on the provision of mobility devices in less resourced settings 2011.
28.
Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5:36–45.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Kim J, Mulholland SJ. Seating/wheelchair technology in the developing world: need for a closer look. Technol Disabil. 1999;11(1):21–7.
30.
Shore S. Use of an economical wheelchair in India and Peru: impact on health and function. Med Sci Monit. 2008;14(12):71–9.
31.
Shore S, Juillerat S. The impact of a low cost wheelchair on the quality of life of the disabled in the developing world. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(9):CR533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Toro ML, Garcia Y, Ojeda AM, Dausey DJ, Pearlman J. Quantitative exploratory evaluation of the frequency, causes and consequences of rehabilitation wheelchair breakdowns delivered at a paediatric clinic in Mexico. Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development. 2012;23(3):48–64.CrossRef
33.
Howitt J. Donated wheelchairs in low-income countries - issues and alternative methods for improving wheelchair provision. The 4th Institution of Engineering and Technology Seminar on Appropriate Healthcare Technologies for Developing Countries; 23–24 May: IEEE Explore; 2006. p. 39–44.
34.
Oderud T, editor. User satisfaction survey: an assessment study on wheelchairs in Tanzania. Report of a consensus conference on wheelchairs for developing countries, Bengaluru, India 6-11 November 2006: WHO, ISPO, and USAID; 2007.
35.
Hotchkiss R. Putting the tools in the hands that can use them: Wheelchairs in the Third World. RESNA 10th Annual Conference; San Jose, CA1987.
36.
Eide AH, Oderud T. Assistive technology in low-income countries. In: MacLachlan M, Swartz L, editors. Disability and international development: towards inclusive global health. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 149–60.CrossRef
37.
Sheldon S, Jacobs NA. Report of a Consensus Conference on Wheelchairs for Developing Countries. Bengaluru, India 6-11 November 2006: WHO, ISPO, and USAID; 2007.
38.
39.
40.
Constantine D, Hingley C, Jowitt J. Donated wheelchairs in low-income countries - issues and alternative methods for improving wheelchair provision. The 4th Institution of Engineering and Technology Seminar on Appropriate Healthcare Technologies for Developing Countries; 23–24 May. London, UK: IEEE Explore; 2006.
41.
Glumac LK, Pennington SL, Sweeney JK, Leavitt RL. Guatemalan caregivers’ perceptions of receiving and using wheelchairs donated for their children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2009;21(2):167–75.CrossRefPubMed
42.
McPherson B. Hearing assistive technologies in developing countries: background, achievements and challenges. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2014(0):1–5.
43.
Carkeet D, Pither D, Anderson M. Developing self-sustainable hearing centers in the developing world-case study of EARs Inc project in Dominican Republic. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(5):391–8.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Ikeda AJ, Grabowski AM, Lindsley A, Sadeghi-Demneh E, Reisinger KD. A scoping literature review of the provision of orthoses and prostheses in resource-limited environments 2000–2010. Part one: considerations for success. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2013:0309364613500690.
45.
Rispin K, Wee J. A paired outcomes study comparing two pediatric wheelchairs for low resource settings; the Regency pediatric wheelchair and a similarly sized wheelchair made in Kenya. Assist Technol. 2013;26(2):88–95.CrossRef
46.
Jefferds AN, Beyene NM, Upadhyay N, Shoker P, Pearlman JL, Cooper RA, et al. Current state of mobility technology provision in less-resourced countries. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21(1):221–42.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Pearlman J, editor. Review session: Review of literature on wheelchairs for developing countries & Review of wheelchair provision in developing countries. Consensus Conference on Wheelchairs for Developing Countries; 2006.
48.
Borg J, Lindstrom A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: national and international responsibilities to implement the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Lancet. 2009;374:1863–5.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Borg J, Lindstrom A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: a review from the perspective of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2011;35(1):20–9.CrossRef
50.
51.
Filmer D. Disability, poverty, and schooling in developing countries: results from 14 household surveys. World Bank Econ Rev. 2008;22(1):141–63.CrossRef
52.
Kusumastuti P, Pradanasari R, Ratnawati A. The Problems of People with Disability in Indonesia and What Is Being Learned from the World Report on Disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(1):S63–7.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Carson MC, editor. Advancement of appropriate rehabilitation technology in Indonesia. RESNA Annual Conference; 1994; Nashville, TN: RESNA Press.
54.
Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Charlifue S, Gerhart KA, Mellick D, Overholser D, et al. Guide for use of the CHART: Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Englewood: Craig Hospital; 1992.
55.
Hall KM, Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, Brooks C, Stuart KJ. The Craig handicap assessment and reporting technique (CHART): metric properties and scoring. Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil. 1998;4(1):16–30.CrossRef
56.
World Health Organization. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med. 1998;28(3):551–8.CrossRef
57.
Kirby RL. Wheelchair Skills Program Version 4.1 Wheelchair Skills Test Manual. In: University D, editor.2011.
58.
Mountain A, Kirby RL, Smith C. The wheelchair skills test, version 2.4: validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;4:16–23.
59.
60.
Karmarkar A, Collins DM, Cooksley C. Development of a Wheelchair Assessment Checklist: Preliminary Psychometric Analysis Annual RESNA Conference; New Orleans, LA2009.
61.
Kumar A, Schmeler MR, Karmarkar AM, Collins DM, Cooper R, Cooper RA, et al. Test-retest reliability of the functional mobility assessment (FMA): a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(3):213–19.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Rispin K, Schein R, Wee J. A Modification of the Functional Mobility Assessment for use with School Children in Kenya. 29th International Seating Symposium; Nashville, TN2013.
63.
64.
Worobey L, Oyster M, Nemunaitis G, Cooper R, Boninger ML. Increases in wheelchair breakdowns, repairs, and adverse consequences for people with traumatic spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(6):463–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65.
McClure L, Boninger M, Oyster M, Williams S, Houlihan B, Lieberman J, et al. Wheelchair repairs, breakdown, and adverse consequences for people with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:2034–8.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Toro ML, Pearlman J, Oyster M, Boninger M, editors. Type and Frequency of Reported Wheelchair Repairs and Adverse Consequences Among People with Spinal Cord Injury. Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America Conference; 2014 June 11–15; Indianapolis.
67.
MacPhee AH, Kirby RL, Coolen AL, Smith C, MacLeod DA, Dupuis DJ. Wheelchair skills training program: A randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(1):41–50.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Best KL, Kirby RL, Smith C, MacLeod DA. Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(12):2316–23.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Kirby RL, Kirby RL, Smith C, Seaman R, Macleod DA, Parker K. The manual wheelchair wheelie: A review of our current understanding of an important motor skill. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1(1–2):119–27.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Kirby RL, Kirby RL, Cooper RA. Applicability of the Wheelchair Skills Program to the Indian context. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(11–12):969–72.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Kirby RL, Mifflen NJ, Thibault DL, Smith C, Best KL, Thompson KJ, et al. The manual wheelchair-handling skills of caregivers and the effect of training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):2011–9.CrossRefPubMed
72.
73.
74.
Routhier F, Kirby RL, Smith C, Demers L. The wheelchair skills program: relevance to the European setting. vol 20: Challenges for Assistive Technology. 2007.
75.
Tozato F, Tobimatsu Y, Wang C-W, Iwaya T, Kumamoto K, Ushiyama T. Reliability and validity of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique for Japanese individuals with spinal cord injury. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2005;205(4):357–66.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Golhasani-Keshtan F, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Fattahi AS, Soltani-Moghaddas SH, Omidi-Kashani F. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Persian version of Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART) short form. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(22):1909–14.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Bray N, Noyes J, Edwards RT, Harris N. Wheelchair interventions, services and provision for disabled children: a mixed-method systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The impact of the World Health Organization 8-steps in wheelchair service provision in wheelchair users in a less resourced setting: a cohort study in Indonesia
Authors
Maria L. Toro
Chika Eke
Jonathan Pearlman
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1268-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

China’s community-based strategy of universal preconception care in rural areas at a population level using a novel risk classification system for stratifying couples´ preconception health status

Research article

Readiness of healthcare providers for eHealth: the case from primary healthcare centers in Lebanon

Research article

Understanding the local context and its possible influences on shaping, implementing and running social accountability initiatives for maternal health services in rural Democratic Republic of the Congo: a contextual factor analysis

Research article

Newborn screening and prophylactic interventions for sickle cell disease in 47 countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Research article

From personal crisis care to convenience shopping: an interpretive description of the experiences of people with mental illness and addictions in community pharmacies

Research article

A pilot study among older adults of the concordance between their self-reports to a health survey and spousal proxy reports on their behalf