Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2012

01-12-2012 | Melanomas

Prognostic Value of BRAF V600 Mutations in Melanoma Patients After Resection of Metastatic Lymph Nodes

Authors: Stéphanie Moreau, MD, Philippe Saiag, MD, PhD, Philippe Aegerter, MD, PhD, Daphné Bosset, MD, Christine Longvert, MD, Zofia Hélias-Rodzewicz, PhD, Cristi Marin, MD, Frédérique Peschaud, MD, PhD, Sophie Chagnon, MD, PhD, Utte Zimmermann, MD, Thierry Clerici, MD, Jean-François Emile, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

BRAF V600 mutations are frequent in melanomas, and BRAFV600-targeted therapy have dramatic, but often transitory, efficacy in stage IV patients. Prognosis of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III melanoma is heterogeneous. We aimed to determine the overall survival (OS) of stage III patients with a nodal deposit of ≥2 mm according to BRAF V600 mutations and other previously reported prognostic criteria.

Methods

This retrospective study included 105 consecutive patients with stage III cutaneous melanomas. Most patients underwent a prospective follow-up. BRAF V600 mutations were detected by sequencing and pyrosequencing of DNA in samples containing >60 % melanoma cells.

Results

BRAF mutations (p.V600E and p.V600K in 83 and 14 % of cases, respectively) were detected in 40 % of the patients. For patients with and without BRAF mutations, death occurred in 83.3 and 60.3 %, with a median OS of 1.4 and 2.8 years, respectively. Patient age, primary melanoma ulceration, number of invaded lymph nodes, AJCC staging at study entry, and BRAF status were linked to OS in the univariate analysis. The only characteristics associated with OS in the multivariate analysis were number of invaded lymph nodes (P = 0.005, hazard ratio 2.2, 95 % confidence interval 1.3–3.9) and BRAF status (P = 0.005, hazard ratio 1.9, 95 % confidence interval 1.2–3.1).

Conclusions

BRAF V600 status could be used to stage melanoma patients with nodal deposits. Our results may also help to plan adjuvant trials in these patients, for whom the low tumor load may induce longer efficacy of BRAF-targeted therapies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6199–206.PubMedCrossRef Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6199–206.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2517–26.PubMedCrossRef Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2517–26.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors among 2,313 patients with stage III melanoma: comparison of nodal micrometastases versus macrometastases. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2452–9.PubMedCrossRef Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors among 2,313 patients with stage III melanoma: comparison of nodal micrometastases versus macrometastases. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2452–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference van der Ploeg APT, van Akkooi ACJ, Rutkowski P, et al. Prognosis in patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma is accurately defined by the combined Rotterdam tumor load and Dewar topography criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2206–14.PubMedCrossRef van der Ploeg APT, van Akkooi ACJ, Rutkowski P, et al. Prognosis in patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma is accurately defined by the combined Rotterdam tumor load and Dewar topography criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2206–14.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee JH, Choi JW, Kim YS. Frequencies of BRAF and NRAS mutations are different in histological types and sites of origin of cutaneous melanoma: a meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:776–84.PubMedCrossRef Lee JH, Choi JW, Kim YS. Frequencies of BRAF and NRAS mutations are different in histological types and sites of origin of cutaneous melanoma: a meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:776–84.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T, et al. Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2135–47.PubMedCrossRef Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T, et al. Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2135–47.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goel VK, Lazar AJF, Warneke CL, Redston MS, Haluska FG. Examination of mutations in BRAF, NRAS, and PTEN in primary cutaneous melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:154–60.PubMedCrossRef Goel VK, Lazar AJF, Warneke CL, Redston MS, Haluska FG. Examination of mutations in BRAF, NRAS, and PTEN in primary cutaneous melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:154–60.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Saldanha G, Potter L, Daforno P, Pringle JH. Cutaneous melanoma subtypes show different BRAF and NRAS mutation frequencies. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4499–505.PubMedCrossRef Saldanha G, Potter L, Daforno P, Pringle JH. Cutaneous melanoma subtypes show different BRAF and NRAS mutation frequencies. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4499–505.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Stark M, Hayward N. Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity and copy number analysis in melanoma using high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2632–42.PubMedCrossRef Stark M, Hayward N. Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity and copy number analysis in melanoma using high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2632–42.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gast A, Scherer D, Chen B, et al. Somatic alterations in the melanoma genome: a high-resolution array-based comparative genomic hybridization study. Genes Chromosom. Cancer. 2010;49:733–45.PubMedCrossRef Gast A, Scherer D, Chen B, et al. Somatic alterations in the melanoma genome: a high-resolution array-based comparative genomic hybridization study. Genes Chromosom. Cancer. 2010;49:733–45.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shinozaki M, Fujimoto A, Morton DL, Hoon DSB. Incidence of BRAF oncogene mutation and clinical relevance for primary cutaneous melanomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1753–7.PubMedCrossRef Shinozaki M, Fujimoto A, Morton DL, Hoon DSB. Incidence of BRAF oncogene mutation and clinical relevance for primary cutaneous melanomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1753–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Libra M, Malaponte G, Navolanic PM, et al. Analysis of BRAF mutation in primary and metastatic melanoma. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:1382–4.PubMedCrossRef Libra M, Malaponte G, Navolanic PM, et al. Analysis of BRAF mutation in primary and metastatic melanoma. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:1382–4.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lázár V, Ecsedi S, Szöllosi AG, et al. Characterization of candidate gene copy number alterations in the 11q13 region along with BRAF and NRAS mutations in human melanoma. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:1367–78.PubMedCrossRef Lázár V, Ecsedi S, Szöllosi AG, et al. Characterization of candidate gene copy number alterations in the 11q13 region along with BRAF and NRAS mutations in human melanoma. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:1367–78.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Si L, Kong Y, Xu X, et al. Prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation in Chinese melanoma patients: large scale analysis of BRAF and NRAS mutations in a 432-case cohort. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:94–100.PubMedCrossRef Si L, Kong Y, Xu X, et al. Prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation in Chinese melanoma patients: large scale analysis of BRAF and NRAS mutations in a 432-case cohort. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:94–100.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1239–46.PubMedCrossRef Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1239–46.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yang H, Higgins B, Kolinsky K, et al. RG7204 (PLX4032), a selective BRAFV600E inhibitor, displays potent antitumor activity in preclinical melanoma models. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5518–27.PubMedCrossRef Yang H, Higgins B, Kolinsky K, et al. RG7204 (PLX4032), a selective BRAFV600E inhibitor, displays potent antitumor activity in preclinical melanoma models. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5518–27.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mocellin S, Pasquali S, Rossi CR, Nitti D. Interferon alpha adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:493–501.PubMedCrossRef Mocellin S, Pasquali S, Rossi CR, Nitti D. Interferon alpha adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:493–501.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2507–16.PubMedCrossRef Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2507–16.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Houben R, Becker JC, Kappel A, et al. Constitutive activation of the Ras-Raf signaling pathway in metastatic melanoma is associated with poor prognosis. J Carcinog. 2004;3:6.PubMedCrossRef Houben R, Becker JC, Kappel A, et al. Constitutive activation of the Ras-Raf signaling pathway in metastatic melanoma is associated with poor prognosis. J Carcinog. 2004;3:6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Menzies AM, Haydu LE, Visintin L, et al. Distinguishing clinicopathologic features of patients with V600E and V600K BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(12):3242–9. Menzies AM, Haydu LE, Visintin L, et al. Distinguishing clinicopathologic features of patients with V600E and V600K BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(12):3242–9.
21.
go back to reference Guedj M, Bourillon A, Combadières C, et al. Variants of the MATP/SLC45A2 gene are protective for melanoma in the French population. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:1154–60.PubMedCrossRef Guedj M, Bourillon A, Combadières C, et al. Variants of the MATP/SLC45A2 gene are protective for melanoma in the French population. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:1154–60.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Saiag P, Bosquet L, Guillot B, et al. Management of adult patients with cutaneous melanoma without distant metastasis: 2005 update of the French Standards, Options and Recommendations guidelines. Summary report. Eur J Dermatol. 2007;17:325–31.PubMed Saiag P, Bosquet L, Guillot B, et al. Management of adult patients with cutaneous melanoma without distant metastasis: 2005 update of the French Standards, Options and Recommendations guidelines. Summary report. Eur J Dermatol. 2007;17:325–31.PubMed
23.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–7.CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1180–4.PubMedCrossRef McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1180–4.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.PubMedCrossRef Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Grob JJ, Dreno B, de la Salmonière P, et al. Randomised trial of interferon alpha-2a as adjuvant therapy in resected primary melanoma thicker than 1.5 mm without clinically detectable node metastases. French Cooperative Group on Melanoma. Lancet. 1998;351(9120):1905–10.PubMedCrossRef Grob JJ, Dreno B, de la Salmonière P, et al. Randomised trial of interferon alpha-2a as adjuvant therapy in resected primary melanoma thicker than 1.5 mm without clinically detectable node metastases. French Cooperative Group on Melanoma. Lancet. 1998;351(9120):1905–10.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Eggermont AMM, Suciu S, Santinami M, et al. Adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b versus observation alone in resected stage III melanoma: final results of EORTC 18991, a randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9633):117–26.PubMedCrossRef Eggermont AMM, Suciu S, Santinami M, et al. Adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b versus observation alone in resected stage III melanoma: final results of EORTC 18991, a randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9633):117–26.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gould Rothberg BE, Bracken MB, Rimm DL. Tissue biomarkers for prognosis in cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:452–74.PubMedCrossRef Gould Rothberg BE, Bracken MB, Rimm DL. Tissue biomarkers for prognosis in cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:452–74.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Liu W, Kelly JW, Trivett M, et al. Distinct clinical and pathological features are associated with the BRAF(T1799A(V600E)) mutation in primary melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:900–5.PubMedCrossRef Liu W, Kelly JW, Trivett M, et al. Distinct clinical and pathological features are associated with the BRAF(T1799A(V600E)) mutation in primary melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:900–5.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Dong J, Phelps RG, Qiao R, et al. BRAF oncogenic mutations correlate with progression rather than initiation of human melanoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3883–5.PubMed Dong J, Phelps RG, Qiao R, et al. BRAF oncogenic mutations correlate with progression rather than initiation of human melanoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3883–5.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Yazdi AS, Palmedo G, Flaig MJ, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:1160–2.PubMedCrossRef Yazdi AS, Palmedo G, Flaig MJ, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:1160–2.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sigalotti L, Fratta E, Parisi G, Coral S, Maio M. Stability of BRAF V600E mutation in metastatic melanoma: new insights for therapeutic success? Br J Cancer. 2011;105:327–8.PubMedCrossRef Sigalotti L, Fratta E, Parisi G, Coral S, Maio M. Stability of BRAF V600E mutation in metastatic melanoma: new insights for therapeutic success? Br J Cancer. 2011;105:327–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Maldonado JL, Fridlyand J, Patel H, et al. Determinants of BRAF mutations in primary melanomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1878–90.PubMedCrossRef Maldonado JL, Fridlyand J, Patel H, et al. Determinants of BRAF mutations in primary melanomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1878–90.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognostic Value of BRAF V600 Mutations in Melanoma Patients After Resection of Metastatic Lymph Nodes
Authors
Stéphanie Moreau, MD
Philippe Saiag, MD, PhD
Philippe Aegerter, MD, PhD
Daphné Bosset, MD
Christine Longvert, MD
Zofia Hélias-Rodzewicz, PhD
Cristi Marin, MD
Frédérique Peschaud, MD, PhD
Sophie Chagnon, MD, PhD
Utte Zimmermann, MD
Thierry Clerici, MD
Jean-François Emile, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2457-5

Other articles of this Issue 13/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2012 Go to the issue