Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2010

01-06-2010 | Otology

Prognostic factors of long-term outcomes after ossiculoplasty using multivariate analysis

Authors: Yasuo Mishiro, Masafumi Sakagami, Tadashi Kitahara, Chieko Kakutani

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of the retrospective study is to investigate the prognostic factors of long-term outcomes following ossiculoplasty. The setting was a tertiary referral and academic center. The series consisted of 269 patients, who underwent ossiculoplasty by the same surgeon between 1989 and 2003 and were followed for more than 5 years. Postoperative hearing outcomes were considered successful, if the postoperative air-bone gap was <20 dB. Prognostic factors were analyzed using multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Successful hearing was achieved in 143 patients (53.2%). The presence of the stapes and primary surgery was significantly favorable predictive factors. Better knowledge of these predictive factors may contribute to improve the surgeon’s judgement and the information given to the patients preoperatively.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Kitahara T, Kondoh K, Kubo T (2008) Long-term hearing outcomes after ossiculoplasty in comparison to short-term outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29:326–329CrossRefPubMed Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Kitahara T, Kondoh K, Kubo T (2008) Long-term hearing outcomes after ossiculoplasty in comparison to short-term outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29:326–329CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Adachi O, Kakutani C (2009) Prognostic factors of short-term outcomes after ossiculoplasty using multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Arch Otolaryngol 135:738–741 Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Adachi O, Kakutani C (2009) Prognostic factors of short-term outcomes after ossiculoplasty using multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Arch Otolaryngol 135:738–741
3.
go back to reference American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. (1995) Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:186–187 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. (1995) Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:186–187
4.
go back to reference Bellucci RJ (1989) Selection of cases and classification of tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 22:911–926PubMed Bellucci RJ (1989) Selection of cases and classification of tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 22:911–926PubMed
5.
go back to reference Austin DF (1985) Reporting results in tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 6:85–88PubMed Austin DF (1985) Reporting results in tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 6:85–88PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kartush JM (1994) Ossicular chain construction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 27:689–715PubMed Kartush JM (1994) Ossicular chain construction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 27:689–715PubMed
7.
go back to reference Becvarovski Z, Kartush JM (2001) Smoking and tympanoplasty: implications for prognosis and the middle ear risk index (MERI). Laryngoscope 111:1806–1811CrossRefPubMed Becvarovski Z, Kartush JM (2001) Smoking and tympanoplasty: implications for prognosis and the middle ear risk index (MERI). Laryngoscope 111:1806–1811CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Black B (1992) Ossiculoplasty prognosis: the SPITE method of assessment. Am J Otol 13:544–551PubMed Black B (1992) Ossiculoplasty prognosis: the SPITE method of assessment. Am J Otol 13:544–551PubMed
9.
go back to reference Mills RP (1993) The influence of pathological and technical and technical variables on hearing results in ossiculoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol 18:202–205PubMed Mills RP (1993) The influence of pathological and technical and technical variables on hearing results in ossiculoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol 18:202–205PubMed
10.
go back to reference Albu S, Babinghian G, Trabalzini F (1998) Prognostic factors in tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 19:136–140CrossRefPubMed Albu S, Babinghian G, Trabalzini F (1998) Prognostic factors in tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 19:136–140CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dornhoffer JL, Gardner E (2001) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system. Otol Neurotol 21:299–304CrossRef Dornhoffer JL, Gardner E (2001) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system. Otol Neurotol 21:299–304CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yung M, Vowler SL (2006) Long-term results in ossiculoplasty: an analysis of prognostic factors. Otol Neurotol 27:874–881CrossRefPubMed Yung M, Vowler SL (2006) Long-term results in ossiculoplasty: an analysis of prognostic factors. Otol Neurotol 27:874–881CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognostic factors of long-term outcomes after ossiculoplasty using multivariate analysis
Authors
Yasuo Mishiro
Masafumi Sakagami
Tadashi Kitahara
Chieko Kakutani
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1133-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2010 Go to the issue