Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 7/2012

01-07-2012 | Original Article

Primary anastomosis in necrotizing enterocolitis: the first option to consider

Authors: Miguel Guelfand, Marcela Santos, Maricarmen Olivos, Alejandra Ovalle

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most frequent gastrointestinal emergency in preterm newborns. Thirty percent of all cases will require surgical intervention. Following resection of the involved segment, most patients will undergo a diverting enterostomy.

Objective

To describe the safety and effectiveness of primary anastomosis in patients with complicated NEC.

Methods

This study was a retrospective chart review. The study participants were obtained from both public and private health systems between December 2004 and December 2009 in Santiago, Chile. The inclusion criteria were any patient who underwent a laparotomy for necrotizing enterocolitis. The following variables were evaluated: gestational age, birth weight, use of peritoneal drains, macroscopic features of the intestinal segment, number of anastomoses, parenteral nutrition requirements and post-surgical complications.

Results

Seventy patients were identified. Sixty patients (85 %) underwent primary anastomosis. The remaining 10 patients underwent a resection with enterostomy. In the primary anastomosis group (n = 60), twelve percent weighed <1,000 g and 22 % weighed 1,000–1,500 g. Two anastomoses were required in 18 patients. Post-surgical complications included infection of the surgical wound in three cases and anastomotic dehiscence in only one case. Seven percent developed short bowel syndrome. Overall mortality was 11.6 %, all secondary to sepsis.

Conclusion

In this series, primary anastomosis was a safe alternative in the management of complicated NEC, with low morbidity and mortality, independent of age, weight, intraperitoneal contamination or extent of disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Srinivasan PS, Brandler MD, D’Souza A (2008) Necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol 35(1):251–272PubMedCrossRef Srinivasan PS, Brandler MD, D’Souza A (2008) Necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol 35(1):251–272PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Blakely ML, Gupta H, Lally KP (2008) Surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis and isolated intestinal perforation in premature neonates. Semin Perinatol 32(2):122–126PubMedCrossRef Blakely ML, Gupta H, Lally KP (2008) Surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis and isolated intestinal perforation in premature neonates. Semin Perinatol 32(2):122–126PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Singh M, Owen A, Gull S et al (2006) Surgery for intestinal perforation in preterm neonates: anastomosis vs stoma. J Pediatr Surg 41(4):725–729 (discussion 725–729) Singh M, Owen A, Gull S et al (2006) Surgery for intestinal perforation in preterm neonates: anastomosis vs stoma. J Pediatr Surg 41(4):725–729 (discussion 725–729)
4.
go back to reference Pierro A, Hall N (2003) Surgical treatments of infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Neonatol 8(3):223–232PubMedCrossRef Pierro A, Hall N (2003) Surgical treatments of infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Neonatol 8(3):223–232PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Guner YS, Chokshi N, Petrosyan M et al (2008) Necrotizing enterocolitis—bench to bedside: novel and emerging strategies. Semin Pediatr Surg 17(4):255–265PubMedCrossRef Guner YS, Chokshi N, Petrosyan M et al (2008) Necrotizing enterocolitis—bench to bedside: novel and emerging strategies. Semin Pediatr Surg 17(4):255–265PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hall NJ, Curry J, Drake DP, Spitz L, Kiely EM, Pierro A (2005) Resection and primary anastomosis is a valid surgical option for infants with necrotizing enterocolitis who weigh less than 1000 g. Arch Surg 140(12):1149–1151PubMedCrossRef Hall NJ, Curry J, Drake DP, Spitz L, Kiely EM, Pierro A (2005) Resection and primary anastomosis is a valid surgical option for infants with necrotizing enterocolitis who weigh less than 1000 g. Arch Surg 140(12):1149–1151PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Hall N, Eaton S, Pierro A (2009) The evidence base for neonatal surgery. Early Hum Dev 85:713–719PubMedCrossRef Hall N, Eaton S, Pierro A (2009) The evidence base for neonatal surgery. Early Hum Dev 85:713–719PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kiesewetter WB, Taghizadeh F, Bower RJ (1979) Necrotizing enterocolitis: is there a place for resection and primary anastomosis? J Pediatr Surg 14:360–362CrossRef Kiesewetter WB, Taghizadeh F, Bower RJ (1979) Necrotizing enterocolitis: is there a place for resection and primary anastomosis? J Pediatr Surg 14:360–362CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cheng W, Leung MP, Tam PK (1999) Surgical intervention in necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates with symptomatic congenital heart disease. Pediatr Surg Int 15(7):492–495PubMedCrossRef Cheng W, Leung MP, Tam PK (1999) Surgical intervention in necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates with symptomatic congenital heart disease. Pediatr Surg Int 15(7):492–495PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference O’Connor A, Sawin RS (1998) High morbidity of enterostomy and its closure in premature infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Arch Surg 133(8):875–880PubMedCrossRef O’Connor A, Sawin RS (1998) High morbidity of enterostomy and its closure in premature infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Arch Surg 133(8):875–880PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Harberg FJ, McGill CW, Saleem MM et al (1983) Resection with primary anastomosis for necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg 18(6):743–746PubMedCrossRef Harberg FJ, McGill CW, Saleem MM et al (1983) Resection with primary anastomosis for necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg 18(6):743–746PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Primary anastomosis in necrotizing enterocolitis: the first option to consider
Authors
Miguel Guelfand
Marcela Santos
Maricarmen Olivos
Alejandra Ovalle
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3092-8

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Pediatric Surgery International 7/2012 Go to the issue