Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2012

Open Access 01-02-2012 | Original Paper

Preoperative quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison of 64-slice computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and size of implanted prosthesis

Authors: Katarzyna Mizia-Stec, Piotr Pysz, Marek Jasiński, Tomasz Adamczyk, Agnieszka Drzewiecka-Gerber, Artur Chmiel, Michał Krejca, Andrzej Bochenek, Stanisław Woś, Maciej Sosnowski, Zbigniew Gąsior, Maria Trusz-Gluza, Michał Tendera

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Precise measurements of aortic complex diameters are essential for preoperative examinations of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) scheduled for aortic valve (AV) replacement. We aimed to prospectively compare the accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) measurements of the AV complex and to analyze the role of the multi-modality aortic annulus diameter (AAd) assessment in the selection of the optimal prosthesis to be implanted in patients surgically treated for degenerative AS. 20 patients (F/M: 3/17; age: 69 ± 6.5 years) with severe degenerative AS were enrolled into the study. TTE, TEE and MSCT including AV calcium score (AVCS) assessment were performed in all patients. The values of AAd obtained in the long AV complex axis (TTE, TEE, MSCT) and in multiplanar perpendicular imaging (MSCT) were compared to the size of implanted prosthesis. The mean AAd was 24 ± 3.6 mm using TTE, 26 ± 4.2 mm using TEE, and 26.9 ± 3.2 in MSCT (P = 0.04 vs. TTE). The mean diameter of the left ventricle out-flow tract in TTE (19.9 ± 2.7 mm) and TEE (19.5 ± 2.7 mm) were smaller than in MSCT (24.9 ± 3.3 mm, P < 0.001 for both). The mean size of implanted prosthesis (22.2 ± 2.3 mm) was significantly smaller than the mean AAd measured by TTE (P = 0.0039), TEE (P = 0.0004), and MSCT (P < 0.0001). The implanted prosthesis size correlated significantly to the AAd: r = 0.603, P = 0.005 for TTE, r = 0.592, P = 0.006 for TEE, and r = 0.791, P < 0.001 for MSCT. Obesity and extensive valve calcification (AV calcium score ≥ 3177Ag.U.) were identified as potent factors that caused a deterioration of both TTE and MSCT performance. The accuracy of AAd measurements in TEE was only limited by AV calcification. In multivariate regression analysis the mean value of the minimum and maximum AAd obtained in MSCT-multiplanar perpendicular imaging was an independent factor (r = 0.802, P < 0.0001) predicting the size of implanted prosthesis. In patients with AS echocardiography remains the main diagnostics tool in clinical practice. MSCT as a 3-dimentional modality allows for accurate measurement of entire AV complex and facilitates optimal matching of prosthesis size.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J et al (2007) Task force on the management of valvular hearth disease of the European society of cardiology; ESC committee for practice guidelines. ESC Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 28:230–268PubMed Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J et al (2007) Task force on the management of valvular hearth disease of the European society of cardiology; ESC committee for practice guidelines. ESC Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 28:230–268PubMed
2.
go back to reference Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu ME, Samir R et al (2009) Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Eur Heart J 30:2079–2086PubMedCrossRef Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu ME, Samir R et al (2009) Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Eur Heart J 30:2079–2086PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Friedrich GJ et al (2006) Multisliced computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1410–1417PubMedCrossRef Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Friedrich GJ et al (2006) Multisliced computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1410–1417PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Alkadhi H, Wildermiuth S, Plass A et al (2006) Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector CT and echocardiography. Radiology 240:47–55PubMedCrossRef Alkadhi H, Wildermiuth S, Plass A et al (2006) Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector CT and echocardiography. Radiology 240:47–55PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Grander W et al (2006) Aortic valve calcification as quantified with multislice computed tomography predicts short-term clinical outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 15:494–498PubMed Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Grander W et al (2006) Aortic valve calcification as quantified with multislice computed tomography predicts short-term clinical outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 15:494–498PubMed
6.
go back to reference Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J et al (2007) Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. Am J Roentgenol 189:197–203CrossRef Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J et al (2007) Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. Am J Roentgenol 189:197–203CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shah RG, Novaro GM, Blandon RJ et al (2009) Aortic valve area: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomography for aortic valve area measurements as compared to transthoracic echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(6):601–609PubMedCrossRef Shah RG, Novaro GM, Blandon RJ et al (2009) Aortic valve area: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomography for aortic valve area measurements as compared to transthoracic echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(6):601–609PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Brochet E et al (2010) Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:186–194PubMedCrossRef Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Brochet E et al (2010) Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:186–194PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al. (2009) Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Am Soc Echocardiogr 22(1):1-23; Erratum in: J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22(5):442 Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al. (2009) Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Am Soc Echocardiogr 22(1):1-23; Erratum in: J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22(5):442
10.
go back to reference Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ et al (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832PubMedCrossRef Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ et al (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference La Bounty TM, Sundaram B, Agarwal P et al (2008) Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis. Am J Roentgenol 191(6):1652–1658CrossRef La Bounty TM, Sundaram B, Agarwal P et al (2008) Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis. Am J Roentgenol 191(6):1652–1658CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lembcke A, Kivelitz DE, Borges AC et al (2009) Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterisation. Invest Radiol 44(1):7–14PubMedCrossRef Lembcke A, Kivelitz DE, Borges AC et al (2009) Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterisation. Invest Radiol 44(1):7–14PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lembcke A, Woinke M, Borges AC et al (2009) Grading of aortic valve stenosis at 64-slice spiral computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography and calibration against cardiac catheterization. Invest Radiol 44(6):360–368PubMedCrossRef Lembcke A, Woinke M, Borges AC et al (2009) Grading of aortic valve stenosis at 64-slice spiral computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography and calibration against cardiac catheterization. Invest Radiol 44(6):360–368PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1(3):321–330PubMedCrossRef Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1(3):321–330PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jasinski M, Hayton J, Kadziola Z et al (2002) Hemodynamical performance after stented vs stentless aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg 43(3):313–317 Jasinski M, Hayton J, Kadziola Z et al (2002) Hemodynamical performance after stented vs stentless aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg 43(3):313–317
16.
go back to reference Doddamani S, Grushko MJ, Makaryus AN et al (2009) Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by 64-slice multi-detector CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(2):175–181PubMedCrossRef Doddamani S, Grushko MJ, Makaryus AN et al (2009) Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by 64-slice multi-detector CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(2):175–181PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Doddamani S, Bello R, Friedman MA et al (2007) Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by real time 3D echocardiography: implications for the determination of aortic valve area. Echocardiography 24(8):860–866PubMedCrossRef Doddamani S, Bello R, Friedman MA et al (2007) Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by real time 3D echocardiography: implications for the determination of aortic valve area. Echocardiography 24(8):860–866PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schultz C, Weustink A, Piazza N et al (2009) Geometry of degree of apposition of the corevalve revalving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(10):911–918PubMedCrossRef Schultz C, Weustink A, Piazza N et al (2009) Geometry of degree of apposition of the corevalve revalving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(10):911–918PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Westermann Y, Geigenmuller A, Elgeti T et al. (2009) Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 22. [Epub ahead of print] Westermann Y, Geigenmuller A, Elgeti T et al. (2009) Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 22. [Epub ahead of print]
20.
go back to reference Rivard AL, Bartel T, Bianco RW et al (2009) Evaluation of aortic root and valve calcifications by multi-detector computed tomography. J Heart Valve Dis 18(6):662–670PubMed Rivard AL, Bartel T, Bianco RW et al (2009) Evaluation of aortic root and valve calcifications by multi-detector computed tomography. J Heart Valve Dis 18(6):662–670PubMed
21.
go back to reference Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al (2002) Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081–1086PubMedCrossRef Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al (2002) Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081–1086PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Brenner DJ (2004) Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 231:440–445PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ (2004) Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 231:440–445PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison of 64-slice computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and size of implanted prosthesis
Authors
Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
Piotr Pysz
Marek Jasiński
Tomasz Adamczyk
Agnieszka Drzewiecka-Gerber
Artur Chmiel
Michał Krejca
Andrzej Bochenek
Stanisław Woś
Maciej Sosnowski
Zbigniew Gąsior
Maria Trusz-Gluza
Michał Tendera
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9784-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2012 Go to the issue