Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2024

Open Access 01-05-2024 | Premedication | Research

Rates of paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions using a modified Markman’s infusion protocol as primary prophylaxis

Authors: Rebecca Symons, Fiona Heath, Jennifer Duggan, Kim Tam Bui, Lily Byun, Michael Friedlander, Yeh Chen Lee

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Markman’s desensitisation protocol allows successful retreatment of patients who have had significant paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions. We aimed to reduce the risk and severity of paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions by introducing this protocol as primary prophylaxis.

Methods

We evaluated all patients with a gynaecological malignancy receiving paclitaxel before (December 2018 to September 2019) and after (October 2019 to July 2020) the implementation of a modified Markman’s desensitisation protocol. The pre-implementation group received paclitaxel over a gradually up-titrated rate from 60 to 180 ml/h. The post-implementation group received paclitaxel via 3 fixed-dose infusion bags in the first 2 cycles. Rates and severity of paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions were compared.

Results

A total of 426 paclitaxel infusions were administered to 78 patients. The median age was 64 years (range 34–81), and the most common diagnosis was ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer (67%, n = 52/78). Paclitaxel hypersensitivity reaction rates were similar in the pre-implementation (8%, n = 16/195) and post-implementation groups (9%, n = 20/231; p = 0.87). Most paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions occurred within 30 min (pre- vs. post-implementation, 88% [n = 14/16] vs. 75% [n = 15/20]; p = 0.45) and were grade 2 in severity (pre- vs. post-implementation, 81% [n = 13/16] vs. 75% [n = 15/20]; p = 0.37). There was one grade 3 paclitaxel hypersensitivity reaction in the pre-implementation group. All patients were successfully rechallenged in the post-implementation group compared to 81% (n = 13/16) in the pre-implementation group (p = 0.43).

Conclusion

The modified Markman’s desensitisation protocol as primary prophylaxis did not reduce the rate or severity of paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions, although all patients could be successfully rechallenged.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zidan J, Hussein O, Abzah A, Tamam S, Farraj Z, Friedman E (2008) Oral premedication for the prevention of hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel. Med Oncol 25(3):274–278CrossRefPubMed Zidan J, Hussein O, Abzah A, Tamam S, Farraj Z, Friedman E (2008) Oral premedication for the prevention of hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel. Med Oncol 25(3):274–278CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Berger MJ, Dulles LJ, Rettig AE, Lustberg MB, Phillips GS, Shapiro CL (2012) Feasibility of stopping paclitaxel premedication after two doses in patients not experiencing a previous infusion reaction. Support Care Cancer 20:1991–1997CrossRefPubMed Berger MJ, Dulles LJ, Rettig AE, Lustberg MB, Phillips GS, Shapiro CL (2012) Feasibility of stopping paclitaxel premedication after two doses in patients not experiencing a previous infusion reaction. Support Care Cancer 20:1991–1997CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Boulanger J, Boursiquot JN, Cournoyer G, Lemieux J, Masse MS, Almanric K, the Comite de l’evolution des pratiquesenoncologie (2014) Management of hypersensitivity to platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy: CEPO review and clinical recommendations. Curr Oncol 21(4):630–641CrossRef Boulanger J, Boursiquot JN, Cournoyer G, Lemieux J, Masse MS, Almanric K, the Comite de l’evolution des pratiquesenoncologie (2014) Management of hypersensitivity to platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy: CEPO review and clinical recommendations. Curr Oncol 21(4):630–641CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Caiado J, Castells MC (2021) Drug desensitizations for chemotherapy: safety and efficacy in preventing anaphylaxis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 21(6):1–13CrossRef Caiado J, Castells MC (2021) Drug desensitizations for chemotherapy: safety and efficacy in preventing anaphylaxis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 21(6):1–13CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mezzano V, Giavina-Bianchi P, Picard M, Caiado J, Castells M (2014) Drug desensitization in the management of hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy. BioDrugs 28(2):133–144CrossRefPubMed Mezzano V, Giavina-Bianchi P, Picard M, Caiado J, Castells M (2014) Drug desensitization in the management of hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy. BioDrugs 28(2):133–144CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Aoyama T, Takano M, Miyamoto M, Yoshikawa T, Soyama H, Kato K, Ishibashi H, Iwahashi H, Nakatsuka M, Yajima I, Shimizu Y (2017) Is there any predictor for hypersensitivity reactions in gynecologic cancer patients treated with paclitaxel-based therapy? Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80(1):65–69CrossRefPubMed Aoyama T, Takano M, Miyamoto M, Yoshikawa T, Soyama H, Kato K, Ishibashi H, Iwahashi H, Nakatsuka M, Yajima I, Shimizu Y (2017) Is there any predictor for hypersensitivity reactions in gynecologic cancer patients treated with paclitaxel-based therapy? Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80(1):65–69CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Lansinger OM, Biedermann S, He Z, Colevas AD (2021) Do steroids matter? A retrospective review of premedication for taxane chemotherapy and hypersensitivity reactions. J Clin Oncol 39(32):3583–590CrossRefPubMed Lansinger OM, Biedermann S, He Z, Colevas AD (2021) Do steroids matter? A retrospective review of premedication for taxane chemotherapy and hypersensitivity reactions. J Clin Oncol 39(32):3583–590CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Markman M, Kennedy A, Webster K, Kulp B, Peterson G, Belinson J (2000) Paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reactions: experience of the gynecologic oncology program of the Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center. J Clin Oncol 18(1):102–102CrossRefPubMed Markman M, Kennedy A, Webster K, Kulp B, Peterson G, Belinson J (2000) Paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reactions: experience of the gynecologic oncology program of the Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center. J Clin Oncol 18(1):102–102CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dewaele E, Verschueren C, Specenier P (2017) Premedication strategy for paclitaxel, still an unsolved question after 30 years. Belg J Med Oncol-Amsterdam, 2007, Currens 11(2):46–55 Dewaele E, Verschueren C, Specenier P (2017) Premedication strategy for paclitaxel, still an unsolved question after 30 years. Belg J Med Oncol-Amsterdam, 2007, Currens 11(2):46–55
13.
go back to reference O’Cathail SM, Shaboodien R, Mahmoud S, Carty K, O’Sullivan P, Blagden S, Kwon JS, Agarwal R (2013) Intravenous versus oral dexamethasone premedication in preventing Paclitaxel infusion hypersensitivity reactions in gynecological malignancies. Int J Gynecolo Cancer 23(7):19236CrossRef O’Cathail SM, Shaboodien R, Mahmoud S, Carty K, O’Sullivan P, Blagden S, Kwon JS, Agarwal R (2013) Intravenous versus oral dexamethasone premedication in preventing Paclitaxel infusion hypersensitivity reactions in gynecological malignancies. Int J Gynecolo Cancer 23(7):19236CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yenilmez A, Hood AP, Nguyen LH, Merl MY (2017) Paclitaxel pre-medication: a comparison of two steroid pre-medication protocols. J Oncol Pharm Pract 23(7):491–495CrossRefPubMed Yenilmez A, Hood AP, Nguyen LH, Merl MY (2017) Paclitaxel pre-medication: a comparison of two steroid pre-medication protocols. J Oncol Pharm Pract 23(7):491–495CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Krieger JA, Stanford BL, Ballard EE, Rabinowitz I (2002) Implementation and results of a test dose program with taxanes. J Cancer 8(4):337–341CrossRef Krieger JA, Stanford BL, Ballard EE, Rabinowitz I (2002) Implementation and results of a test dose program with taxanes. J Cancer 8(4):337–341CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Henry A, Charpiat B, Perol M, Vial T, de Saint Hilaire PJ, Descotes J (2006) Paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions: assessment of the utility of a test-dose program. J Cancer 12(3):237–245CrossRef Henry A, Charpiat B, Perol M, Vial T, de Saint Hilaire PJ, Descotes J (2006) Paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions: assessment of the utility of a test-dose program. J Cancer 12(3):237–245CrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Yanaranop M, Chaithongwongwatthana S (2016) Intravenous versus oral dexamethasone for prophylaxis of paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reaction in patients with primary ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 12(3):289–299CrossRefPubMed Yanaranop M, Chaithongwongwatthana S (2016) Intravenous versus oral dexamethasone for prophylaxis of paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reaction in patients with primary ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 12(3):289–299CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Noronha V, Enting D, Thippeswamy R, Joshi A, Patil VM, Prabhash K (2018) Hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel with a modified dexamethasone intravenous premedication regimen. Cancer Res Stat Treat 1(2):78CrossRef Noronha V, Enting D, Thippeswamy R, Joshi A, Patil VM, Prabhash K (2018) Hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel with a modified dexamethasone intravenous premedication regimen. Cancer Res Stat Treat 1(2):78CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lynch DM, Menon S, Mazzola E, Costa J, Jabaley T (2023) A three-step taxane titration protocol decreases hypersensitivity reactions during first and second exposures. JCO Oncol Pract 19(6):e942–e950CrossRefPubMed Lynch DM, Menon S, Mazzola E, Costa J, Jabaley T (2023) A three-step taxane titration protocol decreases hypersensitivity reactions during first and second exposures. JCO Oncol Pract 19(6):e942–e950CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ferrigni E, Grate L, Herzog T, Billingsley C, Jackson A (2021) Comparison of incidence of hypersensitivity reactions of paclitaxel infusions with titrated versus non-titrated infusions. Gynecol Oncol 162:S117–S118CrossRef Ferrigni E, Grate L, Herzog T, Billingsley C, Jackson A (2021) Comparison of incidence of hypersensitivity reactions of paclitaxel infusions with titrated versus non-titrated infusions. Gynecol Oncol 162:S117–S118CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nymberg K, Folan S, Berger M, Li J, Zanath K, VanDeusen J, Vargo C (2021) Comparison of subsequent infusion hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel using two different infusion strategies. Support Care Cancer 29(8):4423–4429CrossRefPubMed Nymberg K, Folan S, Berger M, Li J, Zanath K, VanDeusen J, Vargo C (2021) Comparison of subsequent infusion hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel using two different infusion strategies. Support Care Cancer 29(8):4423–4429CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gradishar WJ (2006) Albumin-bound paclitaxel: a next-generation taxane. Expert Opin Pharmacother 7(8):1401–1053CrossRef Gradishar WJ (2006) Albumin-bound paclitaxel: a next-generation taxane. Expert Opin Pharmacother 7(8):1401–1053CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rates of paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions using a modified Markman’s infusion protocol as primary prophylaxis
Authors
Rebecca Symons
Fiona Heath
Jennifer Duggan
Kim Tam Bui
Lily Byun
Michael Friedlander
Yeh Chen Lee
Publication date
01-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08460-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2024

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine