Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 12/2016

01-12-2016 | Otology

Predisposing factors for adverse skin reactions with percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices implanted with skin reduction techniques

Authors: Claudia Candreia, Ruth Birrer, Susanna Fistarol, Martin Kompis, Marco Caversaccio, Andreas Arnold, Christof Stieger

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

We present an analysis of adverse events after implantation of bone anchored hearing device in our patient population with focus on individual risk factors for peri-implant skin reactions. The investigation involved a chart review of adult Baha patients (n = 179) with 203 Bahas implanted with skin reduction techniques between 1993 and 2009, a questionnaire (n = 97) and a free clinical examination (n = 47). Skin reactions were graded by severity from 0 (no skin reaction) to 4 (implant loss resulting from infection) according to Holgers. We analyzed the skin reaction rate (SRR) defined as the number of skin reactions per year and the worst Holgers grade (WHG), which indicates the grade of the worst skin reaction per implant. We defined 20 parameters including the demographic characteristics, surgery details, subjective benefits, handling and individual factors. The most frequent adverse events (85 %) were skin reactions. The average SRR was 0.426 per Baha year. Six parameters showed an association with the SRR or the WHG. The clinically most relevant factors are an elevated Body Mass Index (BMI, p = 0.02) and darker skin type (p = 0.03). The SRR increased with the distance between the tragus and the implant (p = 0.02). Regarding the identified risk factors, the SRR might be reduced by selecting a location for the implant near the pinna and by specific counseling regarding post-operative care for patients with darker skin type or an elevated Body Mass Index (BMI). Few of the factors analyzed were found to influence the SRR and WHG. Since most adverse skin reactions could be treated easily with local therapy, our results suggest that in adult patients, individual risk factors for skin reactions are not a contraindication for Baha implantation. Thus, patients can be selected purely on audiological criteria.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Hol MK, Bosman AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2005) Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements. Otol Neurotol 26(5):999–1006CrossRefPubMed Hol MK, Bosman AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2005) Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements. Otol Neurotol 26(5):999–1006CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference McDermott AL, Dutt SN, Tziambazis E, Reid AP, Proops DW (2002) Disability, handicap and benefit analysis with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Glasgow hearing aid benefit and difference profiles. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 28:29–36 McDermott AL, Dutt SN, Tziambazis E, Reid AP, Proops DW (2002) Disability, handicap and benefit analysis with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Glasgow hearing aid benefit and difference profiles. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 28:29–36
8.
go back to reference Reyes RA, Tjellstrom A, Granstrom G (2000) Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: a 0- to 8-year follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122(2):272–276CrossRefPubMed Reyes RA, Tjellstrom A, Granstrom G (2000) Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: a 0- to 8-year follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122(2):272–276CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hakansson B, Liden G, Tjellstrom A, Ringdahl A, Jacobsson M, Carlsson P, Erlandson BE (1990) Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 151:1–16PubMed Hakansson B, Liden G, Tjellstrom A, Ringdahl A, Jacobsson M, Carlsson P, Erlandson BE (1990) Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 151:1–16PubMed
11.
go back to reference Tjellstrom A, Granstrom G (1994) Long-term follow-up with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a review of the first 100 patients between 1977 and 1985. Ear Nose Throat J 73(2):112–114PubMed Tjellstrom A, Granstrom G (1994) Long-term follow-up with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a review of the first 100 patients between 1977 and 1985. Ear Nose Throat J 73(2):112–114PubMed
12.
go back to reference Holgers KM, Tjellstrom A, Bjursten LM, Erlandsson BE (1988) Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 9(1):56–59PubMed Holgers KM, Tjellstrom A, Bjursten LM, Erlandsson BE (1988) Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 9(1):56–59PubMed
13.
go back to reference Lustig LR, Arts HA, Brackmann DE, Francis HF, Molony T, Megerian CA, Moore GF, Moore KM, Morrow T, Potsic W, Rubenstein JT, Srireddy S, Syms CA 3rd, Takahashi G, Vernick D, Wackym PA, Niparko JK (2001) Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients. Otol Neurotol 22(3):328–334CrossRefPubMed Lustig LR, Arts HA, Brackmann DE, Francis HF, Molony T, Megerian CA, Moore GF, Moore KM, Morrow T, Potsic W, Rubenstein JT, Srireddy S, Syms CA 3rd, Takahashi G, Vernick D, Wackym PA, Niparko JK (2001) Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients. Otol Neurotol 22(3):328–334CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Branemark PI, Albrektsson T (1982) Titanium implants permanently penetrating human skin. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 16(1):17–21CrossRefPubMed Branemark PI, Albrektsson T (1982) Titanium implants permanently penetrating human skin. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 16(1):17–21CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dun CA, Hol MK, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2011) Fitting of an 8.5-millimeter abutment for bone conduction devices: indications and postintervention course. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 120(6):386–390CrossRefPubMed Dun CA, Hol MK, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2011) Fitting of an 8.5-millimeter abutment for bone conduction devices: indications and postintervention course. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 120(6):386–390CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Holgers KM, Thomsen P, Tjellstrom A, Bjursten LM (1995) Immunohistochemical study of the soft tissue around long-term skin-penetrating titanium implants. Biomaterials 16(8):611–616CrossRefPubMed Holgers KM, Thomsen P, Tjellstrom A, Bjursten LM (1995) Immunohistochemical study of the soft tissue around long-term skin-penetrating titanium implants. Biomaterials 16(8):611–616CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Holgers KM (2000) Characteristics of the inflammatory process around skin-penetrating titanium implants for aural rehabilitation. Audiology 39(5):253–259CrossRefPubMed Holgers KM (2000) Characteristics of the inflammatory process around skin-penetrating titanium implants for aural rehabilitation. Audiology 39(5):253–259CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Larsson A, Wigren S, Andersson M, Ekeroth G, Flynn M, Nannmark U (2012) Histologic evaluation of soft tissue integration of experimental abutments for bone anchored hearing implants using surgery without soft tissue reduction. Otol Neurotol 33(8):1445–1451. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318268d4e0 CrossRefPubMed Larsson A, Wigren S, Andersson M, Ekeroth G, Flynn M, Nannmark U (2012) Histologic evaluation of soft tissue integration of experimental abutments for bone anchored hearing implants using surgery without soft tissue reduction. Otol Neurotol 33(8):1445–1451. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0b013e318268d4e0​ CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Faber HT, Dun CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK (2015) Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3746-y Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Faber HT, Dun CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK (2015) Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-015-3746-y
32.
go back to reference Nelissen RC, Stalfors J, de Wolf MJ, Flynn MC, Wigren S, Eeg-Olofsson M, Green K, Rothera MP, Mylanus EA, Hol MK (2014) Long-term stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel osseointegrated implant for bone conduction hearing: 3-year data from a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol 35(8):1486–1491. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000533 CrossRefPubMed Nelissen RC, Stalfors J, de Wolf MJ, Flynn MC, Wigren S, Eeg-Olofsson M, Green K, Rothera MP, Mylanus EA, Hol MK (2014) Long-term stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel osseointegrated implant for bone conduction hearing: 3-year data from a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol 35(8):1486–1491. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0000000000000533​ CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predisposing factors for adverse skin reactions with percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices implanted with skin reduction techniques
Authors
Claudia Candreia
Ruth Birrer
Susanna Fistarol
Martin Kompis
Marco Caversaccio
Andreas Arnold
Christof Stieger
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4106-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 12/2016 Go to the issue