Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Original Article

Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines

Authors: Heba Iskandar, Yan Yan, Jill Elwing, Dayna Early, Graham A. Colditz, Jean S. Wang

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer published guidelines for colonoscopy screening and surveillance in 2008 and affirmed them in 2012. Characteristics associated with guideline adherence among US gastroenterologists have not been assessed.

Aim

Assess awareness and adherence of US gastroenterologists with national guidelines for colonoscopy screening and surveillance and predictors of adherence to guidelines.

Methods

A Web-based survey was administered to gastroenterologists in various practice settings across the USA.

Results

A total of 306 gastroenterologists completed the survey; 86 % reported awareness of the guidelines. Low-volume colonoscopists (<20/month) were less likely to be aware of the guidelines (OR 0.26, p = 0.03) compared to high-volume colonoscopists (>100/month). Those completing training before 1990 were less likely to report following guidelines (OR 0.37, p = 0.01). Adherence with guidelines was then assessed via clinical scenarios. Compared to physicians finishing training in 1991–2010, less adherence was seen in those finishing before 1990 (OR 0.75, p < 0.001) or currently in training (OR 0.72, p = 0.004). Compared to the Western USA, less adherence was seen in the Midwest (OR 0.69, p = 0.001), Northeast (OR 0.63, p < 0.001), and South (OR 0.59, p < 0.001). Lower adherence was seen among non-academic physicians (OR 0.72, p = 0.001) and low-volume colonoscopists (OR 0.52, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

There is poor adherence with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines among US gastroenterologists. Poor adherence was associated with being in training or finishing training before 1990, practicing in the South, non-academic settings, and low colonoscopy volume. These findings can target interventions for quality improvement in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1865–1871.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1865–1871.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:143–159 (quiz 184-145). Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:143–159 (quiz 184-145).
3.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.CrossRefPubMed Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, Schoenfeld P. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:554–558.CrossRefPubMed Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, Schoenfeld P. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:554–558.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Ransohoff DF. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:264–271.CrossRefPubMed Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Ransohoff DF. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:264–271.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Shah TU, Voils CI, McNeil R, Wu R, Fisher DA. Understanding gastroenterologist adherence to polyp surveillance guidelines. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1283–1287.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Shah TU, Voils CI, McNeil R, Wu R, Fisher DA. Understanding gastroenterologist adherence to polyp surveillance guidelines. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1283–1287.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:562–567 (quiz 497). Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:562–567 (quiz 497).
10.
go back to reference Salz T, Weinberger M, Ayanian JZ, et al. Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res.. 2010;10:256.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Salz T, Weinberger M, Ayanian JZ, et al. Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res.. 2010;10:256.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, Riall TS, Kuo YF. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1335–1343.CrossRefPubMed Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, Riall TS, Kuo YF. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1335–1343.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo YF, Riall TS, Goodwin JS. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:542–550. Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo YF, Riall TS, Goodwin JS. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:542–550.
13.
go back to reference Sanaka MR, Super DM, Feldman ES, Mullen KD, Ferguson DR, McCullough AJ. Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:97–103.CrossRefPubMed Sanaka MR, Super DM, Feldman ES, Mullen KD, Ferguson DR, McCullough AJ. Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:97–103.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mulder SA, Ouwendijk RJ, van Leerdam ME, Nagengast FM, Kuipers EJ. A nationwide survey evaluating adherence to guidelines for follow-up after polypectomy or treatment for colorectal cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:487–492.CrossRefPubMed Mulder SA, Ouwendijk RJ, van Leerdam ME, Nagengast FM, Kuipers EJ. A nationwide survey evaluating adherence to guidelines for follow-up after polypectomy or treatment for colorectal cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:487–492.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rossi F, Sosa JA, Aslanian HR. Screening colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing practice patterns: a population-based survey of gastroenterologists. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:1089–1094.CrossRefPubMed Rossi F, Sosa JA, Aslanian HR. Screening colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing practice patterns: a population-based survey of gastroenterologists. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:1089–1094.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ransohoff DF, Yankaskas B, Gizlice Z, Gangarosa L. Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:2623–2630.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Ransohoff DF, Yankaskas B, Gizlice Z, Gangarosa L. Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:2623–2630.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yabroff KR, Klabunde CN, Yuan G, et al. Are physicians’ recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent? J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:177–184.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Yabroff KR, Klabunde CN, Yuan G, et al. Are physicians’ recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent? J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:177–184.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
go back to reference Radaelli F, Paggi S, Bortoli A, De Pretis G, Italian Association of Hospital G. Overutilization of post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in clinical practice: a prospective, multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis.. 2012;44:748–753.CrossRefPubMed Radaelli F, Paggi S, Bortoli A, De Pretis G, Italian Association of Hospital G. Overutilization of post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in clinical practice: a prospective, multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis.. 2012;44:748–753.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference van Kooten H, de Jonge V, Schreuders E, et al. Awareness of postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: a nationwide survey of colonoscopists in Canada. Can J Gastroenterol.. 2012;26:79–84.PubMedCentralPubMed van Kooten H, de Jonge V, Schreuders E, et al. Awareness of postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: a nationwide survey of colonoscopists in Canada. Can J Gastroenterol.. 2012;26:79–84.PubMedCentralPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lieberman D, Nadel M, Smith RA, et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the quality assurance task group of the national colorectal cancer roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:757–766.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman D, Nadel M, Smith RA, et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the quality assurance task group of the national colorectal cancer roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:757–766.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines
Authors
Heba Iskandar
Yan Yan
Jill Elwing
Dayna Early
Graham A. Colditz
Jean S. Wang
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3403-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 4/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.