Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis—should we use ICSI for all?

Authors: Baruch Feldman, Adva Aizer, Masha Brengauz, Keren Dotan, Jacob Levron, Eyal Schiff, Raoul Orvieto

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is commonly used during pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in vitro fertilization (IVF), aiming to eliminate the risk of contamination from extraneous sperm DNA. Recently, ICSI “overuse” in non-male infertility has been doubted, since it does not offer an advantage over IVF. Prompted by the aforementioned observations, we sought to assess the accuracy of IVF vs ICSI in PGD cases, as might be reflected by a difference in the prevalence of discarded embryos as a consequent of parental contamination.

Methods

Cohort-historical study of all consecutive patients admitted to the IVF-PGD program in a large tertiary center. The percentages of complete, incomplete diagnosis, PCR failure, abnormal embryos, and the contamination rate with paternal DNA in the IVF-only and the ICSI-only groups. We reviewed the computerized files of all consecutive women admitted to our IVF for a PGD-PCR cycle. Patients were divided accordingly into three groups: an IVF group—where all the oocytes underwent IVF only, an ICSI group—where all oocytes underwent ICSI, and a mixed group—where sibling oocytes underwent both IVF and ICSI. The laboratory data and the genetic diagnostic results were collected and compared between the different insemination groups.

Results

Nine-hundred and twenty-seven patients underwent IVF-PGD cycles in our program, 315 in the IVF group, 565 in the ICSI group, and 47 in the mixed group. No differences were observed in fertilization rates, the percentage of embryos available for biopsy, and the percentages of complete, incomplete diagnosis, PCR failure, or abnormal embryos, between the IVF-only and the ICSI-only groups and between the IVF and the ICSI of sibling oocytes in the mixed group. Moreover, contamination with paternal DNA, through contamination with sperm cells, was negligible. Not one single case of misdiagnosis was encountered during the study period.

Conclusion

It might be therefore concluded that IVF should be the preferred insemination methods in PGD cycles, and ICSI should be indicated only in cases of male-factor infertility.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Harton GL, Magli MC, Lundin K, Montag M, Lemmen J, ESHRE PGD, et al. Consortium/embryology special interest group-best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS). Hum Reprod. 2011;26:41–6.CrossRefPubMed Harton GL, Magli MC, Lundin K, Montag M, Lemmen J, ESHRE PGD, et al. Consortium/embryology special interest group-best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS). Hum Reprod. 2011;26:41–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Berger VK, Baker VL. Preimplantation diagnosis for single gene disorders. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32:107–13.CrossRefPubMed Berger VK, Baker VL. Preimplantation diagnosis for single gene disorders. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32:107–13.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference De Rycke M, Belva F, Goossens V, Moutou C, SenGupta SB, ESHRE PGD, et al. Consortium data collection XIII: cycles from January to December 2010 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2011. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1763–89.CrossRefPubMed De Rycke M, Belva F, Goossens V, Moutou C, SenGupta SB, ESHRE PGD, et al. Consortium data collection XIII: cycles from January to December 2010 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2011. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1763–89.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of single spermatozoon into the oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–8.CrossRefPubMed Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of single spermatozoon into the oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MP, Shaaban M, Kalaf Y, Seddler M, Ghobara T, et al. Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;357:2075–9.CrossRefPubMed Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MP, Shaaban M, Kalaf Y, Seddler M, Ghobara T, et al. Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;357:2075–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tannus S, Son WY, Gilman A, Younes G, Shavit T, Dahan MH. The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:119–24.PubMed Tannus S, Son WY, Gilman A, Younes G, Shavit T, Dahan MH. The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:119–24.PubMed
8.
go back to reference ASRM, the practice committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1395–9.CrossRef ASRM, the practice committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1395–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Orvieto R, Brengauz M, Feldman BA. Novel approach to normal responder patient with repeated implantation failures—a case report. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31:435–7.CrossRefPubMed Orvieto R, Brengauz M, Feldman BA. Novel approach to normal responder patient with repeated implantation failures—a case report. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31:435–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.
11.
go back to reference Dotan K, Feldman B, Goldman B, Peri Y, Peleg L. The single cell as a tool for genetic testing: credibility, precision, implication. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(6):335–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dotan K, Feldman B, Goldman B, Peri Y, Peleg L. The single cell as a tool for genetic testing: credibility, precision, implication. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(6):335–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis—should we use ICSI for all?
Authors
Baruch Feldman
Adva Aizer
Masha Brengauz
Keren Dotan
Jacob Levron
Eyal Schiff
Raoul Orvieto
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0966-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 9/2017 Go to the issue