Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Contributions

Practices Concerning Revisional Bariatric Surgery: a Survey of 460 Surgeons

Authors: Kamal K. Mahawar, Abdelrahman Nimeri, Marco Adamo, Cynthia-Michelle Borg, Rishi Singhal, Omar Khan, Peter K. Small

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is currently little evidence available on various aspects of Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) and no published consensus amongst experts. The purpose of this study was to understand variation in practices concerning RBS.

Methods

Bariatric surgeons from around the world who perform RBS were invited to participate in a questionnaire-based survey on SurveyMonkey®.

Results

A total of 460 respondents from 62 countries took the survey. For revision after gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (75.5%, n = 345) emerged as the commonest choice followed by sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (56.9%, n = 260) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (37.2%, n = 170). For revision after SG, RYGB (77.7%, n = 355) was the commonest option followed by OAGB (42.45%, n = 194) and re-sleeve (22.32%, n = 102). For revision after RYGB, surgical pouch reduction (49.1%, n = 223), prolongation of bilio-pancreatic limb (30.0%, n = 136), and surgical stoma size reduction (26.43%, n = 120) were the most preferred options. Approximately 90.0% of respondents (n = 406/454) routinely perform an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before an RBS, and 85.6% (n = 388/453) routinely perform a contrast study. Ninety percent (n = 403/445) reported that the demand for RBS was usually patient-driven, and there was wide variation in criteria used to define successful response, non-responders, and significant weight regain.

Conclusions

This survey is the first attempt to understand various aspects of RBS. The findings will help in identifying areas for research and allow consensus building amongst experts.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long-term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155(3):385–94.PubMed Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long-term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155(3):385–94.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kowalewski PK, Olszewski R, Walędziak MS, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy-a single-center, retrospective study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):130–4.CrossRef Kowalewski PK, Olszewski R, Walędziak MS, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy-a single-center, retrospective study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):130–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hawkins RB, Mehaffey JH, McMurry TL, et al. Clinical significance of failure to lose weight 10 years after roux-en-y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(10):1710–6.CrossRef Hawkins RB, Mehaffey JH, McMurry TL, et al. Clinical significance of failure to lose weight 10 years after roux-en-y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(10):1710–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Comparison of weight loss and body composition changes with four surgical procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(5):582–7.CrossRef Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Comparison of weight loss and body composition changes with four surgical procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(5):582–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Magkos F, Fraterrigo G, Yoshino J, et al. Effects of moderate and subsequent progressive weight loss on metabolic function and adipose tissue biology in humans with obesity. Cell Metab. 2016;23(4):591–601.CrossRef Magkos F, Fraterrigo G, Yoshino J, et al. Effects of moderate and subsequent progressive weight loss on metabolic function and adipose tissue biology in humans with obesity. Cell Metab. 2016;23(4):591–601.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chowbey PK, Soni V, Kantharia NS, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: outcomes of a case-matched comparison of primary versus revisional surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):52–7.CrossRef Chowbey PK, Soni V, Kantharia NS, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: outcomes of a case-matched comparison of primary versus revisional surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):52–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mahawar KK, Graham Y, Carr WR, et al. Revisional roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review of comparative outcomes with respective primary procedures. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1271–80.CrossRef Mahawar KK, Graham Y, Carr WR, et al. Revisional roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review of comparative outcomes with respective primary procedures. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1271–80.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.CrossRef Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Welbourn R, Small P, Finlay, I, Sarela A, Somers S, Mahawar K. Second National Bariatric Surgery Report. http://www.bomss.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Extract_from_the_NBSR_2014_Report.pdf Last Accessed on 22nd August’ 2015 Welbourn R, Small P, Finlay, I, Sarela A, Somers S, Mahawar K. Second National Bariatric Surgery Report. http://​www.​bomss.​org.​uk/​wp-content/​uploads/​2014/​04/​Extract_​from_​the_​NBSR_​2014_​Report.​pdf Last Accessed on 22nd August’ 2015
10.
go back to reference Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):740–5.CrossRef Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):740–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):240–5.CrossRef Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):240–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dang JT, Switzer NJ, Wu J, et al. Gastric band removal in revisional bariatric surgery, one-step versus two-step: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):866–73.CrossRef Dang JT, Switzer NJ, Wu J, et al. Gastric band removal in revisional bariatric surgery, one-step versus two-step: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):866–73.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cheung D, Switzer NJ, Gill RS, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery following failed primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1757–63.CrossRef Cheung D, Switzer NJ, Gill RS, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery following failed primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1757–63.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tran DD, Nwokeabia ID, Purnell S, et al. Revision of roux-en-y gastric bypass for weight regain: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. Obes Surg. 2016l;26(7):1627–34.CrossRef Tran DD, Nwokeabia ID, Purnell S, et al. Revision of roux-en-y gastric bypass for weight regain: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. Obes Surg. 2016l;26(7):1627–34.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kuzminov A, Palmer AJ, Wilkinson S, et al. Re-operations after secondary bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2237–47.CrossRef Kuzminov A, Palmer AJ, Wilkinson S, et al. Re-operations after secondary bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2237–47.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Coulman KD, Howes N, Hopkins J, et al. A comparison of health professionals’ and patients’ views of the importance of outcomes of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2738–46.CrossRef Coulman KD, Howes N, Hopkins J, et al. A comparison of health professionals’ and patients’ views of the importance of outcomes of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2738–46.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hopkins JC, Howes N, Chalmers K, et al. Outcome reporting in bariatric surgery: an in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set, the BARIACT Study. Obes Rev. 2015;16(1):88–106.CrossRef Hopkins JC, Howes N, Chalmers K, et al. Outcome reporting in bariatric surgery: an in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set, the BARIACT Study. Obes Rev. 2015;16(1):88–106.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40.CrossRef Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Practices Concerning Revisional Bariatric Surgery: a Survey of 460 Surgeons
Authors
Kamal K. Mahawar
Abdelrahman Nimeri
Marco Adamo
Cynthia-Michelle Borg
Rishi Singhal
Omar Khan
Peter K. Small
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3226-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Obesity Surgery 9/2018 Go to the issue