Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 4/2018

01-04-2018 | Original Contributions

Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures: Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Authors: Owaid M. Almalki, Wei-Jei Lee, Jung-Chien Chen, Kong-Han Ser, Yi-Chih Lee, Shu-Chun Chen

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ten to 50% of patients who received restrictive bariatric operations may require reoperation for unsatisfactory weight loss or weight regain. Failed restrictive procedures are usually managed with conversion to another bariatric procedure with a favor of conversion to laparoscopic gastric bypass. Our aim is to evaluate two different bypass techniques, laparoscopic RY gastric bypass (RYGB) versus single-anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass (SAGB) as a revision option (R-RYGB and R-SAGB) for failed restrictive bariatric operations.

Material and Methods

From May 2001 to December 2015, a total of 116 patients with failed restrictive bariatric operations underwent laparoscopic revisional bypass surgery (81 R-SAGB and 35 R-RYGB). Among them, 81 were failed after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and 35 were after adjustable gastric band (AGB). The demographic data, surgical parameters, and outcomes were studied.

Results

The average age at revision surgery was 35.7 years (range 22–56), and the average body mass index (BMI) before reoperation was 37.2 kg/m2 (29.0–51.8). Revision surgery was performed after 58.8 months from the primary surgery on average (14–180 months). The main reasons for the revisions were weight regain (50.9%), inadequate weight loss (31%), and intolerance (18.1%). All of the procedures were completed laparoscopically as one-stage procedure. R-RYGB had significantly longer operative times than R-SAGB. Major complication occurred in 12 (10%) patients without significant difference between R-SAGB group and R-RYGB group. At 1 year follow-up, weight loss was better in R-SAGB than R-RYGB (76.8 vs. 32.9% EWL; p = 0.001). At 5 year follow-up, a significantly lower hemoglobin level was found in R-SAGB group (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

Both SAGB and RYGB are acceptable options for revising a restrictive type of bariatric procedures with equal safety profile. R-SAGB was shown to be a simpler procedure with better weight reduction than R-RYGB but anemia is a considerable complication at long-term follow-up.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.CrossRefPubMed Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.CrossRefPubMed Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Padwal R, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obes Rev. 2011;12(8):602–21.CrossRefPubMed Padwal R, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obes Rev. 2011;12(8):602–21.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference E.Mason, S. Tang, K.E.Renquistetal., A decade of change in obesity surgery. Obes Surg 1997; 7(3):189–197. E.Mason, S. Tang, K.E.Renquistetal., A decade of change in obesity surgery. Obes Surg 1997; 7(3):189–197.
5.
6.
go back to reference Kirshtein B, Kirshtein A, Perry Z, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal and outcome of subsequent revisional bariatric procedures: a retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients. Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:133–7.CrossRefPubMed Kirshtein B, Kirshtein A, Perry Z, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal and outcome of subsequent revisional bariatric procedures: a retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients. Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:133–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen W, Stockman A, et al. Long-term results of a prospective study on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011;21(5):582–7.CrossRefPubMed Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen W, Stockman A, et al. Long-term results of a prospective study on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011;21(5):582–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Marsk R, Jonas E, Gartzios H, et al. High revision rates after laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(1):94–8.CrossRefPubMed Marsk R, Jonas E, Gartzios H, et al. High revision rates after laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(1):94–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Robert M, Poncet J, Boulez J, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass for failure of adjustable gastric banding: a review of 85 cases. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1513–9.CrossRefPubMed Robert M, Poncet J, Boulez J, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass for failure of adjustable gastric banding: a review of 85 cases. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1513–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference De Maria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Meador JG, et al. High failure rate after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2001;223:809–18. De Maria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Meador JG, et al. High failure rate after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2001;223:809–18.
11.
go back to reference Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):740–5.CrossRefPubMed Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):740–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11:276–80.CrossRefPubMed Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11:276–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rutledge R, Walsh TR. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six year study in 2410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1304–8.CrossRefPubMed Rutledge R, Walsh TR. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six year study in 2410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1304–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lee W, Yu P, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:20–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee W, Yu P, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:20–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22:697–703.CrossRefPubMed Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22:697–703.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Piazza L, Ferrara F, Bellia A, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: short-term single-institute experience. Updat Surg. 2011;63:239–42.CrossRef Piazza L, Ferrara F, Bellia A, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: short-term single-institute experience. Updat Surg. 2011;63:239–42.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wang W, Huang MT, Wei PL, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass for failed vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2004;14:777–82.CrossRefPubMed Wang W, Huang MT, Wei PL, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass for failed vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2004;14:777–82.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Feb;12(2):240–5.CrossRefPubMed Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Feb;12(2):240–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Suter M, Ralea S, Millo P, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed vertical banded gastroplasty: a multicenter experience with 203 patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22(10):1554–61.CrossRefPubMed Suter M, Ralea S, Millo P, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed vertical banded gastroplasty: a multicenter experience with 203 patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22(10):1554–61.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kuzminov A, Palmer AJ, Wilkinson S, et al. Re-operation after secondary bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2237–47.CrossRefPubMed Kuzminov A, Palmer AJ, Wilkinson S, et al. Re-operation after secondary bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2237–47.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.CrossRefPubMed Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lee WJ, Lin YH. Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB): appraisal of clinical evidence. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1749–56.CrossRefPubMed Lee WJ, Lin YH. Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB): appraisal of clinical evidence. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1749–56.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:321–7.CrossRefPubMed Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:321–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference von Drygalski A, Andris DA. Anemia after bariatric surgery: more than just iron deficiency. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009;24:217–26.CrossRef von Drygalski A, Andris DA. Anemia after bariatric surgery: more than just iron deficiency. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009;24:217–26.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kwon Y, Kim HJ, Lo Menzo E. Anemia, iron and vitamin B12 deficiencies after sleeve gastrectomy compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(4):589–97.CrossRefPubMed Kwon Y, Kim HJ, Lo Menzo E. Anemia, iron and vitamin B12 deficiencies after sleeve gastrectomy compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(4):589–97.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures: Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Authors
Owaid M. Almalki
Wei-Jei Lee
Jung-Chien Chen
Kong-Han Ser
Yi-Chih Lee
Shu-Chun Chen
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2991-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Obesity Surgery 4/2018 Go to the issue