Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 1/2019

01-01-2019

Postoperative bridging anticoagulation and left ventricular assist system thrombosis

Authors: David M. Nemer, Garrick C. Stewart, Maneka Puligandla, Donna S. Neuberg, Michael M. Givertz, Mandeep R. Mehra, Gregory S. Couper, Jean M. Connors

Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Reduced emphasis on early postoperative bridging anticoagulation is one explanation for the increased incidence of HeartMate II (HM II) pump thrombosis. We conducted a single-center analysis of initial postoperative anticoagulation practices and their impact on the incidence of HM II pump thrombosis. Data was collected on 105 patients undergoing primary HM II implant from 2009 to 2014. A parenteral bridge was defined as use of parenteral anticoagulation prior to attainment of an international normalized ratio ≥ 2 on warfarin. A parenteral bridge was further characterized as early if initiated ≤ 3 days of implant and therapeutic if a manufacturer-specified goal partial thromboplastin time (PTT) was achieved during each of the first 3 days of administration. Pump thrombosis was “suspected” based upon suggestive clinical parameters leading to hospital admission with parenteral anticoagulant administration and “confirmed” by direct visualization of thrombus in the device. A majority of patients (70%) were treated with an initial parenteral bridge, which was started within 3 days of device implantation in 68% of cases. Therapeutic PTT levels were achieved in 52% of patients treated with a parenteral bridge. Patients who were bridged had lower Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profiles (p = 0.039) and longer intensive care unit stay (p = 0.005). Pump thrombosis was suspected in 25% and confirmed in 13% of patients within 6 months of implant. Point estimates of pump thrombosis incidence demonstrated a lower event rate at 6 months in patients who received a therapeutic bridge (15.8%, 95% CI 6.3–29.1% for suspected; 7.9%, 95% CI 2.0–19.3% for confirmed) compared to those who did not receive a therapeutic bridge (29.9%, CI 19.3–41.1% for suspected; 16.4%, 95% CI 8.7–26.3% for confirmed). This trend was not sustained at 12 and 24 months. Cumulative incidence analyses showed no significant difference in the overall incidence of pump thrombosis between patients who did and did not receive a parenteral bridge. In patients undergoing HM II implantation, the use of initial postoperative parenteral bridging anticoagulation is common but frequently sub-therapeutic. Use of a parenteral bridge reaching therapeutic targets may decrease the 6-month but not the overall incidence of pump thrombosis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA et al (2009) Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med 36:2241–2251CrossRef Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA et al (2009) Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med 36:2241–2251CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jorde UP, Kushwaha SS, Tatooles AJ et al (2014) Results of the destination therapy post-food and drug administration approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a prospective study using the INTERMACS registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1751–1757CrossRefPubMed Jorde UP, Kushwaha SS, Tatooles AJ et al (2014) Results of the destination therapy post-food and drug administration approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a prospective study using the INTERMACS registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1751–1757CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL et al (2017) Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant 36:1080–1086CrossRefPubMed Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL et al (2017) Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant 36:1080–1086CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Patel CB, Cowger JA, Zuckermann A (2014) A contemporary review of mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:667–674CrossRefPubMed Patel CB, Cowger JA, Zuckermann A (2014) A contemporary review of mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:667–674CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Starling RC, Moazami N, Silvestry SC et al (2014) Unexpected abrupt increase in left ventricular assist device thrombosis. N Engl J Med 370:33–40CrossRefPubMed Starling RC, Moazami N, Silvestry SC et al (2014) Unexpected abrupt increase in left ventricular assist device thrombosis. N Engl J Med 370:33–40CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL et al (2014) Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) analysis of pump thrombosis in the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:12–22CrossRefPubMed Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL et al (2014) Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) analysis of pump thrombosis in the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:12–22CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD et al (2015) Pump thrombosis in the Thoratec HeartMate II device: an update analysis of the INTERMACS Registry. J Heart Lung Transpl 34:1515–1526CrossRef Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD et al (2015) Pump thrombosis in the Thoratec HeartMate II device: an update analysis of the INTERMACS Registry. J Heart Lung Transpl 34:1515–1526CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mehra MR, Stewart GC, Uber PA (2014) The vexing problem of thrombosis in long-term mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:1–11CrossRefPubMed Mehra MR, Stewart GC, Uber PA (2014) The vexing problem of thrombosis in long-term mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:1–11CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD et al (2007) Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med 357:885–896CrossRefPubMed Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD et al (2007) Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med 357:885–896CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Boyle AJ, Russell SD, Teuteberg JJ et al (2009) Low thromboembolism and pump thrombosis with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: analysis of outpatient anti-coagulation. J Heart Lung Transplant 28:881–887CrossRefPubMed Boyle AJ, Russell SD, Teuteberg JJ et al (2009) Low thromboembolism and pump thrombosis with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: analysis of outpatient anti-coagulation. J Heart Lung Transplant 28:881–887CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Slaughter MS, Naka Y, John R et al (2010) Postoperative heparin may not be required for transitioning patients with a HeartMate II left ventricular assist system to long-term warfarin therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:616–624CrossRefPubMed Slaughter MS, Naka Y, John R et al (2010) Postoperative heparin may not be required for transitioning patients with a HeartMate II left ventricular assist system to long-term warfarin therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:616–624CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, Rogers JG et al (2010) Clinical management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:S1–S39CrossRefPubMed Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, Rogers JG et al (2010) Clinical management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:S1–S39CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference John R, Kamdar F, Liao K et al (2008) Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the Heartmate II left ventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:1318–1323CrossRefPubMed John R, Kamdar F, Liao K et al (2008) Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the Heartmate II left ventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:1318–1323CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Maltais S, Kilic A, Nathan S et al (2017) PREVENtion of HeartMate II Pump thrombosis through clinical management: the PREVENT multi-center study. J Heart Lung Transplant 36:1–12CrossRefPubMed Maltais S, Kilic A, Nathan S et al (2017) PREVENtion of HeartMate II Pump thrombosis through clinical management: the PREVENT multi-center study. J Heart Lung Transplant 36:1–12CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Taghavi S, Ward C, Jayarajan SN, Gaughan J, Wilson LM, Mangi AA (2013) Surgical technique influences HeartMate II left ventricular assist device thrombosis. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1259–1265CrossRefPubMed Taghavi S, Ward C, Jayarajan SN, Gaughan J, Wilson LM, Mangi AA (2013) Surgical technique influences HeartMate II left ventricular assist device thrombosis. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1259–1265CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Uriel N, Han J, Morrison KA et al (2014) Device thrombosis in HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a multifactorial phenomenon. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:51–59CrossRefPubMed Uriel N, Han J, Morrison KA et al (2014) Device thrombosis in HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a multifactorial phenomenon. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:51–59CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mehra MR, Naka Y, Uriel N et al (2017) A fully magnetically levitated circulatory pump for advanced heart failure. N Engl J Med 376:440–450CrossRefPubMed Mehra MR, Naka Y, Uriel N et al (2017) A fully magnetically levitated circulatory pump for advanced heart failure. N Engl J Med 376:440–450CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Postoperative bridging anticoagulation and left ventricular assist system thrombosis
Authors
David M. Nemer
Garrick C. Stewart
Maneka Puligandla
Donna S. Neuberg
Michael M. Givertz
Mandeep R. Mehra
Gregory S. Couper
Jean M. Connors
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0929-5305
Electronic ISSN: 1573-742X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-018-1746-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 1/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.