Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Paper

Post-systolic shortening: normal values and association with validated echocardiographic and invasive measures of cardiac function

Authors: Philip Brainin, Sofie Reumert Biering-Sørensen, Rasmus Møgelvang, Martina Chantal de Knegt, Flemming Javier Olsen, Søren Galatius, Gunnar Hilmar Gislason, Jan Skov Jensen, Tor Biering-Sørensen

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Post-systolic shortening (PSS) does not contribute to the ejection of blood and may inhibit diastolic filling. We determined normal values of PSS in healthy subjects and investigated associations with echocardiographic and invasive measures of systolic and diastolic function. We prospectively analyzed participants from the general population (n = 620, mean age 47 ± 14 years) with no cardiovascular disease. Participants underwent echocardiography, including speckle tracking assessment of the post-systolic index (PSI), strain and time. We defined the PSI as: 100 × [(peak global longitudinal strain − peak systolic longitudinal strain)/(peak global longitudinal strain)]. We also included stable patients (n = 44) referred for left ventricle (LV) catheterization and echocardiography. Normal values: median PSI 2.0% (IQR 0.7, 4.8), post-systolic strain 0.4% (IQR 0.2, 0.8) and post-systolic time 22.6 ms (IQR 10.7, 40.8). Sex modified the relationship between PSI and age (P interaction = 0.037), such that PSI increased with age in women but not in men. PSI was associated with diastolic function (e′, E/e′ and E/A) (P < 0.05 for all), but not with LV ejection fraction (P = 0.08). PSI was associated with invasively measured LV pressure decline in early diastole, dP/dt min (\(\beta\) = 0.12, P = 0.010), but not with LV pressure rise in early systole, dP/dt max (\(\beta\)= − 0.05, P = 0.30). A PSI > 5% had 82% specificity and 99% sensitivity for identifying impaired LV systolic and/or diastolic function. Normal values of PSS are modified by sex. The PSI is associated with most validated echocardiographic and invasive measures of cardiac systolic and diastolic function.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference Grines CL, Bashore TM, Harisios B et al (1989) Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block: the effect of interventricular asynchrony. Circulation 79:845–853CrossRef Grines CL, Bashore TM, Harisios B et al (1989) Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block: the effect of interventricular asynchrony. Circulation 79:845–853CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP et al (2016) Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:1321–1360. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew082 CrossRefPubMed Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP et al (2016) Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:1321–1360. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ehjci/​jew082 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Post-systolic shortening: normal values and association with validated echocardiographic and invasive measures of cardiac function
Authors
Philip Brainin
Sofie Reumert Biering-Sørensen
Rasmus Møgelvang
Martina Chantal de Knegt
Flemming Javier Olsen
Søren Galatius
Gunnar Hilmar Gislason
Jan Skov Jensen
Tor Biering-Sørensen
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1474-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2019 Go to the issue