Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 8/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Article

Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of the pedicle screw: the cement distribution in the vertebral body

Authors: Ming-Hsien Hu, Hung Ta H. Wu, Ming-Chau Chang, Wing-Kuang Yu, Shih-Tien Wang, Chien-Lin Liu

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Many studies have proven that the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation of the pedicle screw can significantly increase stiffness and strength of spinal fixation. Some major complications have also been reported. However, there are no reports discussing cement distribution and its morphology in the osteoporotic vertebral body, which is critical in the analysis of the biomechanical strength of the pedicle screw and the risk of cement leakage after pedicle screw augmentation. In this study, we used computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the cement distribution in the osteoporotic vertebral body after PMMA augmentation of a pedicle screw and to analyze the factors leading to cement leakage. Two groups of patients were studied. Group A consisted 25 osteoporotic patients (mean age of 73 years) with spinal instrumentation who had a total of 145 pedicle screws and cement augmentation with biopsy needles. Group B consisted of 23 osteoporotic patients (mean age of 74.6 years) with spinal instrumentation who had a total of 125 cannulated pedicle screws with cement augmentation. All patients had CT evaluation of the cement distribution in the vertebral body after the surgery. The cement distribution in the vertebrae was divided into four zones in the axial CT view: anterior one-third, middle third, and posterior third of vertebral body, and the pedicle. The morphology of the cement distribution around the pedicle screw was defined as scattered type or concentrate type. The leakage pattern was divided to anterior–lateral, posterior–lateral, and canal leakage. The correlations among bone mineral density (BMD), the cement leakage rate, and cement distribution morphology were also analyzed. The results showed that most augmented pedicle screws had cement extension into three of the four zones of the vertebral body (66.3%), followed by two zones (20%), all four zones (11.5%), and only one zone (2.2%). Overall, 123 screws (84.8%) in Group A and 108 screws (86.4%) in Group B had cement concentrate type distribution. The cement leakage rate in Group A is 18.3% and 13.6% in Group B. Patients with a BMD <0.6 g/cm2 had significantly higher rates of cement leakage and tended toward a scattered cement distribution. There was only one patient who had a symptomatic leakage (sciatica) in Group B. We concluded that the cement distribution after pedicle screw augmentation with biopsy needle or cannulated screw technique was mostly localized in three zones of the vertebral body, and patients with lower BMD had a higher risk of cement leakage and scattered cement distribution.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Becker S, Chavanne A, Spitaler R et al (2008) Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines. Eur Spine J 17:1462–1469PubMedCrossRef Becker S, Chavanne A, Spitaler R et al (2008) Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines. Eur Spine J 17:1462–1469PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Burval DJ, McLain RF, Milks R et al (2007) Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength. Spine 32:1077–1083PubMedCrossRef Burval DJ, McLain RF, Milks R et al (2007) Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength. Spine 32:1077–1083PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chang MC, Liu CL, Chen TH et al (2008) Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screw for osteoporotic spinal surgery: a novel technique. Spine 33:E317–E324PubMedCrossRef Chang MC, Liu CL, Chen TH et al (2008) Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screw for osteoporotic spinal surgery: a novel technique. Spine 33:E317–E324PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chen LH, Tai CL, Lai PL et al (2009) Pullout strength for cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation in severely osteoporotic bone: influences of radial hole and pilot hole tapping. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24:613–618CrossRef Chen LH, Tai CL, Lai PL et al (2009) Pullout strength for cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation in severely osteoporotic bone: influences of radial hole and pilot hole tapping. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24:613–618CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Coe JD, Warden KE, Engr M et al (1990) Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants: a comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires. Spine 15:902–907PubMedCrossRef Coe JD, Warden KE, Engr M et al (1990) Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants: a comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires. Spine 15:902–907PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cook SD, Salkeld SL, Stanley T et al (2004) Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone. Spine 4:402–408CrossRef Cook SD, Salkeld SL, Stanley T et al (2004) Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone. Spine 4:402–408CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Halvorson TL, Kelly LA, Thomas KA et al (1994) Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine 19:2415–2420PubMedCrossRef Halvorson TL, Kelly LA, Thomas KA et al (1994) Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine 19:2415–2420PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hirano T, Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE et al (1997) Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability. Spine 22:2504–2509PubMedCrossRef Hirano T, Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE et al (1997) Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability. Spine 22:2504–2509PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Inceoglu S, Burghardt A, Akbay A et al (2005) Trabecular architecture of lumbar vertebral pedicle. Spine 30:1485–1490PubMedCrossRef Inceoglu S, Burghardt A, Akbay A et al (2005) Trabecular architecture of lumbar vertebral pedicle. Spine 30:1485–1490PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2006) Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine 31:2329–2336PubMedCrossRef Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2006) Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine 31:2329–2336PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kumano K, Hirabayashi S, Ogawa Y et al (1994) Pedicle screws and bone mineral density. Spine 19:1157–1161PubMedCrossRef Kumano K, Hirabayashi S, Ogawa Y et al (1994) Pedicle screws and bone mineral density. Spine 19:1157–1161PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lebwohl NH, Cunningham BW, Dmitriev A et al (2002) Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation techniques in a calf spine model. Spine 27:2312–2320PubMedCrossRef Lebwohl NH, Cunningham BW, Dmitriev A et al (2002) Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation techniques in a calf spine model. Spine 27:2312–2320PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lotz JC, Hu SS, Chieu DF et al (1997) Carbonated apatite cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. Spine 22:2716–2723PubMedCrossRef Lotz JC, Hu SS, Chieu DF et al (1997) Carbonated apatite cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. Spine 22:2716–2723PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference McLain RF, McKinley TO, Yerby SA et al (1997) The effect of bone quality on pedicle screw loading in axial instability: a synthetic model. Spine 22:1454–1460PubMedCrossRef McLain RF, McKinley TO, Yerby SA et al (1997) The effect of bone quality on pedicle screw loading in axial instability: a synthetic model. Spine 22:1454–1460PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Moon BJ, Cho BY, Choi EY et al (2009) Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation for stabilization of the osteoporotic spine: a three-year follow-up of 37 patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 46:305–311PubMedCrossRef Moon BJ, Cho BY, Choi EY et al (2009) Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation for stabilization of the osteoporotic spine: a three-year follow-up of 37 patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 46:305–311PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Moore DC, Maitra RS, Farjo LA et al (1997) Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement. Spine 22:1696–1705PubMedCrossRef Moore DC, Maitra RS, Farjo LA et al (1997) Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement. Spine 22:1696–1705PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Okuyama K, Sato K, Abe E et al (1993) Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine: an in vitro study of mechanical stability. Spine 18:2240–2245PubMedCrossRef Okuyama K, Sato K, Abe E et al (1993) Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine: an in vitro study of mechanical stability. Spine 18:2240–2245PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pfeifer BA, Krag MH, Johnson C (1994) Repair of failed transpedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and matchstick bone reconstruction. Spine 19:350–353PubMedCrossRef Pfeifer BA, Krag MH, Johnson C (1994) Repair of failed transpedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and matchstick bone reconstruction. Spine 19:350–353PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Renner SM, Lim TH, Kim WJ et al (2004) Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method. Spine 29:E212–E216PubMedCrossRef Renner SM, Lim TH, Kim WJ et al (2004) Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method. Spine 29:E212–E216PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Soshi S, Shiba R, Kondo H et al (1991) An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine. Spine 16:1335–1341PubMedCrossRef Soshi S, Shiba R, Kondo H et al (1991) An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine. Spine 16:1335–1341PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Waits C, Burton D, McIff T (2009) Cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation using novel cannulated cement insertion device. Spine 34:E478–E483PubMedCrossRef Waits C, Burton D, McIff T (2009) Cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation using novel cannulated cement insertion device. Spine 34:E478–E483PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wittenberg RH, Shea M, Swartz DE et al (1991) Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusion. Spine 16:647–652PubMedCrossRef Wittenberg RH, Shea M, Swartz DE et al (1991) Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusion. Spine 16:647–652PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yamagata M, Kitahara H, Minami S et al (1992) Mechanical stability of the pedicle screw fixation systems for the lumbar spine. Spine 17(suppl 3):S51–S54PubMedCrossRef Yamagata M, Kitahara H, Minami S et al (1992) Mechanical stability of the pedicle screw fixation systems for the lumbar spine. Spine 17(suppl 3):S51–S54PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yerby SA, Toh E, McLain RF (1998) Revision of failed pedicle screws using hydroxyapatite cement: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 23:1657–1661PubMedCrossRef Yerby SA, Toh E, McLain RF (1998) Revision of failed pedicle screws using hydroxyapatite cement: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 23:1657–1661PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zhuang XM, Yu BS, Zheng ZM, et al (2010) Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws. Spine [Epub ahead of print] Zhuang XM, Yu BS, Zheng ZM, et al (2010) Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws. Spine [Epub ahead of print]
26.
go back to reference Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH et al (1986) A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:99–112PubMed Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH et al (1986) A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:99–112PubMed
Metadata
Title
Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of the pedicle screw: the cement distribution in the vertebral body
Authors
Ming-Hsien Hu
Hung Ta H. Wu
Ming-Chau Chang
Wing-Kuang Yu
Shih-Tien Wang
Chien-Lin Liu
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1824-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

European Spine Journal 8/2011 Go to the issue