Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 3/2014

01-06-2014 | PHASE II STUDIES

Phase II trial of bortezomib alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or stomach

Authors: Allyson J. Ocean, Paul Christos, Joseph A. Sparano, Manish A. Shah, Rhonda K. Yantiss, Jonathan Cheng, Juan Lin, Michael Papetti, Dan Matulich, Felice Schnoll-Sussman, Christen Besanceney-Webler, Jenny Xiang, Maureen Ward, Kaili Temple Dilts, Roger Keresztes, Shannon Holloway, Eric X. Chen, John J. Wright, Maureen E. Lane

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Summary

Purpose To determine the effectiveness of bortezomib plus irinotecan and bortezomib alone in patients with advanced gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric adenocarcinoma. We also sought to explore the effect of these therapeutics on tumor and normal gene expression in vivo. Methods Forty-one patients with advanced GEJ (89 %) or gastric (11 %) adenocarcinoma received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) plus irinotecan (125 mg/m2 days 1, 8) every 21 days as first line therapy (N = 29), or bortezomib alone as second line therapy (N = 12). The trial was designed to detect a 40 % response rate for the combination, and 20 % response rate for bortezomib alone. Affymetrix HU133A gene chip arrays were used for gene expression studies. Results Objective response occurred in 3 of 29 patients (10 %, 95 % confidence intervals [CI] 2 %, 27 %) treated with bortezomib plus irinotecan, and in 1 of 12 patients (8 %, 95 % CI 0 %, 39 %) with bortezomib alone. Due to the limited number of responders, there were no significant correlations with response found in the gene expression profiles of 12 patients whose tumors were sampled before and 24 h after therapy with bortezomib alone (N = 2) or the combination (N = 10). Conclusions We conclude that bortezomib is not effective for the treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the GEJ or stomach, whether used alone or in combination with irinotecan, in an unselected patient population.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Brown LM, Devesa SS, Chow WH (2008) Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among white Americans by sex, stage, and age. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(16):1184–1187PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Brown LM, Devesa SS, Chow WH (2008) Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among white Americans by sex, stage, and age. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(16):1184–1187PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bang YJ et al (2010) Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376(9742):687–697CrossRefPubMed Bang YJ et al (2010) Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376(9742):687–697CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Power DG, Kelsen DP, Shah MA (2010) Advanced gastric cancer–slow but steady progress. Cancer Treat Rev 36(5):384–392CrossRefPubMed Power DG, Kelsen DP, Shah MA (2010) Advanced gastric cancer–slow but steady progress. Cancer Treat Rev 36(5):384–392CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Reinstein E, Ciechanover A (2006) Narrative review: protein degradation and human diseases: the ubiquitin connection. Ann Intern Med 145(9):676–684CrossRefPubMed Reinstein E, Ciechanover A (2006) Narrative review: protein degradation and human diseases: the ubiquitin connection. Ann Intern Med 145(9):676–684CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ludwig H et al (2005) Proteasome inhibition and its clinical prospects in the treatment of hematologic and solid malignancies. Cancer 104(9):1794–1807CrossRefPubMed Ludwig H et al (2005) Proteasome inhibition and its clinical prospects in the treatment of hematologic and solid malignancies. Cancer 104(9):1794–1807CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Richardson PG et al (2003) A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med 348(26):2609–2617CrossRefPubMed Richardson PG et al (2003) A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med 348(26):2609–2617CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hideshima T et al (2001) The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits growth, induces apoptosis, and overcomes drug resistance in human multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Res 61(7):3071–3076PubMed Hideshima T et al (2001) The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits growth, induces apoptosis, and overcomes drug resistance in human multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Res 61(7):3071–3076PubMed
9.
go back to reference Sunwoo JB et al (2001) Novel proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits activation of nuclear factor-kappa B, cell survival, tumor growth, and angiogenesis in squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 7(5):1419–1428PubMed Sunwoo JB et al (2001) Novel proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits activation of nuclear factor-kappa B, cell survival, tumor growth, and angiogenesis in squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 7(5):1419–1428PubMed
10.
go back to reference Shah SA et al (2001) 26S proteasome inhibition induces apoptosis and limits growth of human pancreatic cancer. J Cell Biochem 82(1):110–122CrossRefPubMed Shah SA et al (2001) 26S proteasome inhibition induces apoptosis and limits growth of human pancreatic cancer. J Cell Biochem 82(1):110–122CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cusack JC Jr et al (2001) Enhanced chemosensitivity to CPT-11 with proteasome inhibitor PS-341: implications for systemic nuclear factor-kappaB inhibition. Cancer Res 61(9):3535–3540PubMed Cusack JC Jr et al (2001) Enhanced chemosensitivity to CPT-11 with proteasome inhibitor PS-341: implications for systemic nuclear factor-kappaB inhibition. Cancer Res 61(9):3535–3540PubMed
12.
go back to reference Wiseman LR, Markham A (1996) Irinotecan. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced colorectal cancer. Drugs 52(4):606–623CrossRefPubMed Wiseman LR, Markham A (1996) Irinotecan. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced colorectal cancer. Drugs 52(4):606–623CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Farhat FS (2007) A general review of the role of irinotecan (CPT11) in the treatment of gastric cancer. Med Oncol 24(2):137–146CrossRefPubMed Farhat FS (2007) A general review of the role of irinotecan (CPT11) in the treatment of gastric cancer. Med Oncol 24(2):137–146CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Therasse P et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216CrossRefPubMed Therasse P et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Irizarry RA et al (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4(2):249–264CrossRefPubMed Irizarry RA et al (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4(2):249–264CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Smyth GK (2004) Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3:Article3PubMed Smyth GK (2004) Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3:Article3PubMed
18.
go back to reference Shah MA et al (2011) A multicenter, phase II study of bortezomib (PS-341) in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Invest New Drugs 29(6):1475–1481CrossRefPubMed Shah MA et al (2011) A multicenter, phase II study of bortezomib (PS-341) in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Invest New Drugs 29(6):1475–1481CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kozuch PS et al (2008) Bortezomib with or without irinotecan in relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer: results from a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol 26(14):2320–2326CrossRefPubMed Kozuch PS et al (2008) Bortezomib with or without irinotecan in relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer: results from a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol 26(14):2320–2326CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Phase II trial of bortezomib alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or stomach
Authors
Allyson J. Ocean
Paul Christos
Joseph A. Sparano
Manish A. Shah
Rhonda K. Yantiss
Jonathan Cheng
Juan Lin
Michael Papetti
Dan Matulich
Felice Schnoll-Sussman
Christen Besanceney-Webler
Jenny Xiang
Maureen Ward
Kaili Temple Dilts
Roger Keresztes
Shannon Holloway
Eric X. Chen
John J. Wright
Maureen E. Lane
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0070-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Investigational New Drugs 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine