Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 3/2014

01-06-2014 | PHASE I STUDIES

A phase 1 open-label, sequential dose-escalation study investigating the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous TLC388 administered to patients with advanced solid tumors

Authors: Sharad Ghamande, Chia-Chi Lin, Daniel C. Cho, Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Eunice L. Kwak, Michael H. Silverman, Yunlong Tseng, Min-Wen Kuo, Wendy B. Mach, Shu-Chi Hsu, Teresa Coleman, James Chih-Hsin Yang, Ann-Lii Cheng, Mohammad H. Ghalib, Imran Chuadhary, Sanjay Goel

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Summary

Purpose The first-in-human phase 1 trial examined the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of TLC388, a novel camptothecin with a unique lactone ring modification, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Experimental design TLC388 was administered intravenously to patients with metastatic chemotherapy refractory solid tumors on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients underwent tumor assessments every other cycle. Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1 and 2. Results Fifty-four patients were enrolled at doses ranging from 1.5 to 60.0 mg/m2 over 12 cohorts. Treatment was generally well-tolerated and no cumulative toxicity observed. Two of six patients treated at 60.0 mg/m2 developed DLTs of grade 3 neutropenia causing dose delay and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. The next lower dose, 50.0 mg/m2, was declared as MTD. Treatment-related grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (19 %), leukopenia (15 %), anemia (9 %), and thrombocytopenia (7 %). Grade 3–4 nonhematologic toxicities included diarrhea (2 %) and hyponatremia (4 %). Pharmacokinetics of both diastereomers (S,R and S,S) of TLC388, a mixture of two diastereomers, was dose independent; mean (SD) values for the volume of distribution at steady-state and clearance were 857 (1122) L/m2 for S,R and 996 (1333) L/m2 for S,S, and 2174 (2526) L/h-m2 for S,R and 2670 (2988) L/h-m2 for S,S, respectively. The half-life values averaged 0.67 (1.15) hours for S,R and 0.64 (1.11) hours for S,S. The best overall response was stable disease in 21 (39 %) patients. Prolonged (≥ 6 months) stable disease was noted in eight patients. Conclusions TLC388 at 50 mg/m2 on the current treatment schedule is generally safe and well tolerated.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Long HJ, Bundy BN, Grendys EC et al (2005) Randomized phase III trials of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 23:4626–4633CrossRefPubMed Long HJ, Bundy BN, Grendys EC et al (2005) Randomized phase III trials of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 23:4626–4633CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD et al (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1413–1418CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD et al (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1413–1418CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Huang G, Wang H, Yang LX (2010) Enhancement of radiation-induced DNA damage and inhibition of its repair by a novel camptothecin analog. Anticancer Res 30:937–944PubMed Huang G, Wang H, Yang LX (2010) Enhancement of radiation-induced DNA damage and inhibition of its repair by a novel camptothecin analog. Anticancer Res 30:937–944PubMed
5.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rowinsky EK, Grochow LB, Ettinger DS et al (1994) Phase I and pharmacological study of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (CPT-11) administered as a ninety-minute infusion every 3 weeks. Cancer Res 54:427–436PubMed Rowinsky EK, Grochow LB, Ettinger DS et al (1994) Phase I and pharmacological study of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (CPT-11) administered as a ninety-minute infusion every 3 weeks. Cancer Res 54:427–436PubMed
7.
go back to reference Rowinsky EK, Grochow LB, Hendricks CB et al (1992) Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan: a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor. J Clin Oncol 10:647–656PubMed Rowinsky EK, Grochow LB, Hendricks CB et al (1992) Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan: a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor. J Clin Oncol 10:647–656PubMed
8.
go back to reference Verweij J, Lund B, Beijnen J et al (1993) Phase I and pharmacokinetics study of topotecan, a new topoisomerase I inhibitor. Ann Oncol 4:673–678PubMed Verweij J, Lund B, Beijnen J et al (1993) Phase I and pharmacokinetics study of topotecan, a new topoisomerase I inhibitor. Ann Oncol 4:673–678PubMed
9.
go back to reference Attard G, de Bono JS (2011) Translating scientific advancement into clinical benefit for castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 17:3867–3875CrossRefPubMed Attard G, de Bono JS (2011) Translating scientific advancement into clinical benefit for castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 17:3867–3875CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A phase 1 open-label, sequential dose-escalation study investigating the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous TLC388 administered to patients with advanced solid tumors
Authors
Sharad Ghamande
Chia-Chi Lin
Daniel C. Cho
Geoffrey I. Shapiro
Eunice L. Kwak
Michael H. Silverman
Yunlong Tseng
Min-Wen Kuo
Wendy B. Mach
Shu-Chi Hsu
Teresa Coleman
James Chih-Hsin Yang
Ann-Lii Cheng
Mohammad H. Ghalib
Imran Chuadhary
Sanjay Goel
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-013-0044-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Investigational New Drugs 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine