Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

Authors: David Propper, Keith Jones, D. Alan Anthoney, Wasat Mansoor, Daniel Ford, Martin Eatock, Roshan Agarwal, Michiyasu Inatani, Tomohisa Saito, Masaichi Abe, T. R. Jeffry Evans

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

TP300, a recently developed synthetic camptothecin analogue, is a highly selective topoisomerase I inhibitor. A phase I study showed good safety and tolerability. As camptothecins have proven active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinomas, in this phase II study we assessed the efficacy and safety of TP300 in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinomas.

Methods

Eligible patients had metastatic or locally advanced gastric or Siewert Types II or III GOJ inoperable adenocarcinoma. Patients were chemotherapy naïve unless this had been administered in the perioperative setting.
TP300 was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks (a cycle) for up to 6 cycles at a starting dose of 8 mg/m2 with intra-patient escalation to 10 mg/m2 from cycle 2 in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity. Tumour responses (RECIST 1.1) were assessed every 6 weeks. Toxicity was recorded by NCI-CTCAE version 3.0. Using a modified two-stage Simon design (Stage I and II), a total of 43 patients were to be included providing there were 3 of 18 patients with objective response in Stage I of the study.

Results

In Stage I of the study 20 patients (14 males, 6 females), median age 67 years (range 40 − 82), performance status ECOG 0/1, with GC [14] or GOJ carcinoma [6] were enrolled. Of the 16 evaluable patients, 11 received the planned dose increase to 10 mg/m2 at cycle 2, 2 decreased to 6 mg/m2, and 3 continued on 8 mg/m2. There were no objective responses after 2 cycles of treatment. Twelve patients had stable disease for 1 − 5 months and 4 had progressive disease. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (CI [1.6 − 4.9]), median time to progression (TTP) was 2.9 months (CI [1.4 − 4.2]). Grade 3/4 toxicities (worst grade all cycles) included 7 patients (35 %) with neutropenia, 4 patients (20 %) with anaemia, 2 patients (10 %) with thrombocytopenia, and 3 patients (15 %) with fatigue.
This study was terminated at the end of Stage I due to a lack of the required (3/18) responders.

Conclusions

This study of TP300 showed good drug tolerability but it failed to demonstrate sufficient efficacy as measured by radiological response.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beretta GL, Perego P, Zunino F. Targeting topoisomerase I: molecular mechanisms and cellular determinants of response to topoisomerase I inhibitors. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2008;12:1243–56.CrossRefPubMed Beretta GL, Perego P, Zunino F. Targeting topoisomerase I: molecular mechanisms and cellular determinants of response to topoisomerase I inhibitors. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2008;12:1243–56.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wagener DJ, Verdonk HE, Dirix LY, et al. Phase II trial of CPT-11 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, an EORTC early clinical trials group study. Ann Oncol. 1995;6:129–32.PubMed Wagener DJ, Verdonk HE, Dirix LY, et al. Phase II trial of CPT-11 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, an EORTC early clinical trials group study. Ann Oncol. 1995;6:129–32.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Bouche O, Raoul JL, Bonnetain F, et al. Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study--FFCD 9803. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4319–28.CrossRefPubMed Bouche O, Raoul JL, Bonnetain F, et al. Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study--FFCD 9803. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4319–28.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Langer CJ. The global role of irinotecan in the treatment of lung cancer: 2003 update. Oncology (Williston Park). 2003;17:30–40. Langer CJ. The global role of irinotecan in the treatment of lung cancer: 2003 update. Oncology (Williston Park). 2003;17:30–40.
6.
8.
go back to reference Endo M, Miwa M, Ura M, et al. A water soluble prodrug of a novel camptothecin analog is efficacious against breast cancer resistance protein-expressing tumor xenografts. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009. doi:10.1007/S00280-009-1042-5. Endo M, Miwa M, Ura M, et al. A water soluble prodrug of a novel camptothecin analog is efficacious against breast cancer resistance protein-expressing tumor xenografts. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009. doi:10.​1007/​S00280-009-1042-5.
9.
go back to reference Anthoney DA, et al. Phase I study of TP300 in patients with advanced solid tumors with pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:536.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anthoney DA, et al. Phase I study of TP300 in patients with advanced solid tumors with pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:536.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Weeden S, Fielding J, et al. Patient survival after D1 and D2 resection for gastric cancer: long term results of the MRC randomised surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:1522–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cuschieri A, Weeden S, Fielding J, et al. Patient survival after D1 and D2 resection for gastric cancer: long term results of the MRC randomised surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:1522–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Boku N, Ohtsu A, Shimada Y, et al. Phase II study of a combination of irinotecan and cisplatin against metastatic gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:319–23.PubMed Boku N, Ohtsu A, Shimada Y, et al. Phase II study of a combination of irinotecan and cisplatin against metastatic gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:319–23.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kohne CH, Catane R, Klein B, et al. Irinotecan is active in chemonaive patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II multicentric trial. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:997–1001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kohne CH, Catane R, Klein B, et al. Irinotecan is active in chemonaive patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II multicentric trial. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:997–1001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Baker J, Pisters PW, et al. CPT-11 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced, untreated gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma: results of a phase II study. Cancer. 2002;94:641–6.CrossRefPubMed Ajani JA, Baker J, Pisters PW, et al. CPT-11 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced, untreated gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma: results of a phase II study. Cancer. 2002;94:641–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Baker J, Pisters PW, et al. Irinotecan/ cisplatin /in advanced, treated gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Oncology. 2002;16:16–8.PubMed Ajani JA, Baker J, Pisters PW, et al. Irinotecan/ cisplatin /in advanced, treated gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Oncology. 2002;16:16–8.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Assersohn L, Brown G, Cunningham D, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/Leucovorin in patients with primary refractory or relapsed advanced oesophageal and gastric carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:64–9.CrossRefPubMed Assersohn L, Brown G, Cunningham D, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/Leucovorin in patients with primary refractory or relapsed advanced oesophageal and gastric carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:64–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Glimelius B, Ekstrom K, Hoffman K, et al. Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 1977;8:163–8.CrossRef Glimelius B, Ekstrom K, Hoffman K, et al. Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 1977;8:163–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bugat R. Irinotecan in the treatment of gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(supplement2):ii37–40. symposium article.PubMed Bugat R. Irinotecan in the treatment of gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(supplement2):ii37–40. symposium article.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:1–10.CrossRefPubMed Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:1–10.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tomohisa S, Satofumi I, Masaichi A, et al. Population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation of neutropenia induced by TP300, a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;65(8):1168–78.CrossRef Tomohisa S, Satofumi I, Masaichi A, et al. Population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation of neutropenia induced by TP300, a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;65(8):1168–78.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
Authors
David Propper
Keith Jones
D. Alan Anthoney
Wasat Mansoor
Daniel Ford
Martin Eatock
Roshan Agarwal
Michiyasu Inatani
Tomohisa Saito
Masaichi Abe
T. R. Jeffry Evans
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2828-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Cancer 1/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine