Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Editorial Commentary

PET/MR attenuation correction: where have we come from and where are we going?

Authors: Dimitris Visvikis, Florian Monnier, Julien Bert, Mathieu Hatt, Hadi Fayad

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

The advent of clinical multimodality imaging with the development of PET/CT scanners [1] has presented us with ample opportunities to harvest the benefits of combining functional and anatomical imaging. These benefits concern improved PET quantitative accuracy and overall patient management (improved diagnostic accuracy and therapy response assessment), but also increased patient throughput. It is indeed the last of these points that has substantially contributed to the rapid acceptance of PET/CT imaging in clinical practice eclipsing PET-only systems. Indeed, one of the major reasons behind the improved patient throughput achieved with PET/CT has been the use of CT images for attenuation correction (AC) of the acquired PET emission datasets. In this context, CT images possess two desirable properties. Firstly, CT acquisitions are very fast, removing the need for long radionuclide-based transmission imaging that was traditionally used in PET (about 50 % of the overall acquisition times). Secondly, CT intensity values represent the attenuation properties of the tissues in the imaging field of view, albeit at X-ray photon energies. The necessary transformation of CT images into attenuation maps at 511 keV can be achieved by bilinear transformation [2]. Although such a transformation represents a certain approximation, CT-based AC of PET datasets using such attenuation maps has been shown to lead to the same level of quantitative accuracy and superior contrast in the reconstructed PET images compared to radionuclide-based transmission scanning [3]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beyer T, Townsend DW. Putting 'clear' into nuclear medicine: a decade of PET/CT development. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33(8):857–61.PubMedCrossRef Beyer T, Townsend DW. Putting 'clear' into nuclear medicine: a decade of PET/CT development. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33(8):857–61.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AH, Von Schulthess GK. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29(7):922–7.PubMedCrossRef Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AH, Von Schulthess GK. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29(7):922–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Visvikis D, Costa DC, Croasdale I, Lonn AHR, Bomanji J, Gacinovic S, et al. CT based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of 18FDG uptake in PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30(3):344–53.PubMedCrossRef Visvikis D, Costa DC, Croasdale I, Lonn AHR, Bomanji J, Gacinovic S, et al. CT based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of 18FDG uptake in PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30(3):344–53.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Coombs BD, Szumowski J, Coshow W. Two-point Dixon technique for water-fat signal decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38:884–9.PubMedCrossRef Coombs BD, Szumowski J, Coshow W. Two-point Dixon technique for water-fat signal decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38:884–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Martinez-Moller A, Souvatzoglou M, Delso G, Bundschuh RA, Chefd’hotel C, Ziegler S, et al. Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(4):520–6.PubMedCrossRef Martinez-Moller A, Souvatzoglou M, Delso G, Bundschuh RA, Chefd’hotel C, Ziegler S, et al. Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(4):520–6.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Samarin A, Burger C, Wollenweber SD, Crook DW, Burger IA, Schmid DT, et al. PET/MR imaging of bone lesions – implications for PET quantification from imperfect attenuation correction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1154–60.PubMedCrossRef Samarin A, Burger C, Wollenweber SD, Crook DW, Burger IA, Schmid DT, et al. PET/MR imaging of bone lesions – implications for PET quantification from imperfect attenuation correction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1154–60.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Keereman V, Fierens Y, Broux T, De Deene Y, Lonneux M, Vandenberghe S. MRI based attenuation correction for PET/MRI using ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:812–8.PubMedCrossRef Keereman V, Fierens Y, Broux T, De Deene Y, Lonneux M, Vandenberghe S. MRI based attenuation correction for PET/MRI using ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:812–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Catana C, van der Kouwe A, Benner T, Michel CJ, Hamm M, Fenchel M, et al. Toward implementing an MRI-based PET attenuation-correction method for neurologic studies on the MR-PET brain prototype. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(9):1431–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Catana C, van der Kouwe A, Benner T, Michel CJ, Hamm M, Fenchel M, et al. Toward implementing an MRI-based PET attenuation-correction method for neurologic studies on the MR-PET brain prototype. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(9):1431–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Berker Y, Franke J, Salomon A, Palmowski M, Donker HCW, Temur Y, et al. MRI-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET/MRI systems: a 4-class tissue segmentation technique using a combined ultrashort-echo-time/Dixon MRI sequence. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:796–804.PubMedCrossRef Berker Y, Franke J, Salomon A, Palmowski M, Donker HCW, Temur Y, et al. MRI-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET/MRI systems: a 4-class tissue segmentation technique using a combined ultrashort-echo-time/Dixon MRI sequence. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:796–804.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hofmann M, Steinke F, Scheel V, Charpiat G, Farquhar J, Aschoff P, et al. MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI: a novel approach combining pattern recognition and atlas registration. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(11):1875–83.PubMedCrossRef Hofmann M, Steinke F, Scheel V, Charpiat G, Farquhar J, Aschoff P, et al. MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI: a novel approach combining pattern recognition and atlas registration. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(11):1875–83.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bezrukov I, Schmidt H, Mantlik F, Schwenzer N, Brendle C, Schölkopf B, et al. MR-based attenuation correction methods for improved PET quantification in lesions within bone and susceptibility artifact regions. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(10):1768–74.PubMedCrossRef Bezrukov I, Schmidt H, Mantlik F, Schwenzer N, Brendle C, Schölkopf B, et al. MR-based attenuation correction methods for improved PET quantification in lesions within bone and susceptibility artifact regions. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(10):1768–74.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Johansson A, Karlsson M, Nyholm T. CT substitute derived from MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time. Med Phys. 2011;38(5):2708–14.PubMedCrossRef Johansson A, Karlsson M, Nyholm T. CT substitute derived from MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time. Med Phys. 2011;38(5):2708–14.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Navalpakkam BK, Braun H, Kuwert T, Quick HH. Magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction for PET/MR hybrid imaging using continuous valued attenuation maps. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:323–32.PubMedCrossRef Navalpakkam BK, Braun H, Kuwert T, Quick HH. Magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction for PET/MR hybrid imaging using continuous valued attenuation maps. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:323–32.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Delso G, Martinez-Möller A, Bundschuh RA, Nekolla SG, Ziegler SI. The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction. Med Phys. 2010;37(6):2804–12.PubMedCrossRef Delso G, Martinez-Möller A, Bundschuh RA, Nekolla SG, Ziegler SI. The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction. Med Phys. 2010;37(6):2804–12.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nuyts J, Bal G, Kehren F, Fenchel M, Michel C, Watson C. Completion of a truncated attenuation image from the attenuated PET emission data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013;32(2):237–46.PubMedCrossRef Nuyts J, Bal G, Kehren F, Fenchel M, Michel C, Watson C. Completion of a truncated attenuation image from the attenuated PET emission data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013;32(2):237–46.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mollet P, Keereman V, Clementel E, Vandenberghe S. Simultaneous MR-compatible emission and transmission imaging for PET using time-of-flight information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31(9):1734–42.PubMedCrossRef Mollet P, Keereman V, Clementel E, Vandenberghe S. Simultaneous MR-compatible emission and transmission imaging for PET using time-of-flight information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31(9):1734–42.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Defrise M, Rezaei A, Nuyts J. Transmission-less attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET: analysis of a discrete iterative algorithm. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(4):1073–95.PubMedCrossRef Defrise M, Rezaei A, Nuyts J. Transmission-less attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET: analysis of a discrete iterative algorithm. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(4):1073–95.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Defrise M, Rezaei A, Nuyts J. Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(4):885–99.PubMedCrossRef Defrise M, Rezaei A, Nuyts J. Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(4):885–99.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
PET/MR attenuation correction: where have we come from and where are we going?
Authors
Dimitris Visvikis
Florian Monnier
Julien Bert
Mathieu Hatt
Hadi Fayad
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2748-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 6/2014 Go to the issue