Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Periprosthetic Fracture | Research article

Megaprosthetic replacement in complex distal humerus fractures in elderly patients: a case series

Authors: Matteo Caredda, Luigi Cianni, Andrea De Fazio, Antonio Ziranu, Raffaele Vitiello, Giulio Maccauro

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Managing distal humeral fractures can be challenging for orthopedic surgeons. There are several treatment options for managing this type of fracture, and the treatment method for these fractures should be based on patient-related factors. In elderly patients with osteoporotic bone and severe comminution of the fracture, adequate fixation can be a major challenge for surgeons. The use of megaprosthesis has been recently proposed in traumatology as an alternative to osteosynthesis or conventional prosthesis for the management of comminuted articular fractures in elderly patients with poor bone stock.

Methods

A consecutive case series of 5 patients who underwent reconstruction of the elbow joint with a trabecular hinged modular elbow megaprosthesis was reviewed retrospectively. All patients included had AO/OTA 13C2 and 13C3 fractures with metaphyseal extension and considerable bone loss of the distal humerus. The primary outcome was the evaluation of functional and clinical outcomes with the MEPS score in comminuted distal humerus fractures with metaphyseal extension and poor bone stock in elderly patients treated with elbow megaprosthesis. The secondary outcome was assessing the treatment-related complication rate of this technique in non-oncological fields.

Results

Five patients were included in the study with a mean age of 82.66 ± 7.72 years at surgery. The mean MEPS value was 63 ± 24.2 at 1 month, 81 ± 23.53 at 3 months, 83 ± 24.2 at 6 months, and 84 ± 24.57 at 12 months. No intraoperative complications were recorded in our series. Of 5 patients, four patients had excellent clinical and functional outcomes. We did not encounter wound dehiscence, prosthetic joint infection, aseptic loosening, or periprosthetic fractures.

Conclusions

The indication for this type of treatment must be selected and narrowed down, as it is a salvage procedure, and any failure would cause even more complex situations. Short operating times and early mobilization of the elbow are the advantages of this technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Galano GJ, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. Current treatment strategies for bicolumnar distal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(1):20–30.CrossRefPubMed Galano GJ, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. Current treatment strategies for bicolumnar distal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(1):20–30.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nauth A, McKee MD, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch EH. Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(7):686–700(Https://Doi.Org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00845).CrossRefPubMed Nauth A, McKee MD, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch EH. Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(7):686–700(Https://Doi.Org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00845).CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference McKee MD, Veillette CJ, Hall JA, Schemitsch EH, Wild LM, McCormack R, Perey B, Goetz T, Zomar M, Moon K, Mandel S, Petit S, Guy P, Leung I. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction—internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Jse.2008.06.005.CrossRefPubMed McKee MD, Veillette CJ, Hall JA, Schemitsch EH, Wild LM, McCormack R, Perey B, Goetz T, Zomar M, Moon K, Mandel S, Petit S, Guy P, Leung I. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction—internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(1):3–12. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​Jse.​2008.​06.​005.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Funovics PT, Schuh R, Adams SB Jr, Sabeti-Aschraf M, Dominkus M, Kotz RI. Modular prosthetic reconstruction of major bone defects of the distal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1064–74.CrossRefPubMed Funovics PT, Schuh R, Adams SB Jr, Sabeti-Aschraf M, Dominkus M, Kotz RI. Modular prosthetic reconstruction of major bone defects of the distal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1064–74.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Moghaddam-Alvandi A, Dremel E, Güven F, Heppert V, Wagner C, Studier-Fischer S, Grützner PA, Biglari B. Ellenbogengelenkarthrodese. Indikation, Operationsverfahren Und Klinische Ergebnisse [Arthrodesis of the elbow joint. indications, surgical technique and clinical results]. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113(4):300–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00113-009-1722-y.CrossRefPubMed Moghaddam-Alvandi A, Dremel E, Güven F, Heppert V, Wagner C, Studier-Fischer S, Grützner PA, Biglari B. Ellenbogengelenkarthrodese. Indikation, Operationsverfahren Und Klinische Ergebnisse [Arthrodesis of the elbow joint. indications, surgical technique and clinical results]. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113(4):300–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​S00113-009-1722-y.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Piccioli A, Donati F, Giacomo GD, Ziranu A, Careri S, Spinelli MS, Giannini S, Giannicola G, Perisano C, Maccauro G. Infective complications in tumour endoprostheses implanted after pathological fracture of the limbs. Injury. 2016;47(Suppl 4):S22–8.CrossRefPubMed Piccioli A, Donati F, Giacomo GD, Ziranu A, Careri S, Spinelli MS, Giannini S, Giannicola G, Perisano C, Maccauro G. Infective complications in tumour endoprostheses implanted after pathological fracture of the limbs. Injury. 2016;47(Suppl 4):S22–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rajasekaran RB, Palanisami DR, Natesan R, Jayaramaraju D, Rajasekaran S. Megaprosthesis in distal femur nonunions in elderly patients—experience from twenty four cases. Int Orthop. 2020;44:677–84.CrossRefPubMed Rajasekaran RB, Palanisami DR, Natesan R, Jayaramaraju D, Rajasekaran S. Megaprosthesis in distal femur nonunions in elderly patients—experience from twenty four cases. Int Orthop. 2020;44:677–84.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ziranu A, Lillo M, Fantoni M, Maffulli N, Maccauro G. Single dose cefazolin is safe and effective for pre-operative prophylaxis in orthopaedic oncology. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018;32(6 Suppl. 1):45–9 (PMID: 30644281).PubMed Ziranu A, Lillo M, Fantoni M, Maffulli N, Maccauro G. Single dose cefazolin is safe and effective for pre-operative prophylaxis in orthopaedic oncology. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018;32(6 Suppl. 1):45–9 (PMID: 30644281).PubMed
26.
go back to reference Larry L, Hench L. In Biomaterials, artificial organs and tissue engineering (2005). Larry L, Hench L. In Biomaterials, artificial organs and tissue engineering (2005).
28.
go back to reference Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC Definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Ottobre. 1992;13(10):606–8.CrossRef Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC Definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Ottobre. 1992;13(10):606–8.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Graham TJ, Fitzgerald MS. The destroyed elbow. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2000;29(9 Suppl):9–15(PMID: 11011774).PubMed Graham TJ, Fitzgerald MS. The destroyed elbow. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2000;29(9 Suppl):9–15(PMID: 11011774).PubMed
34.
go back to reference Vitiello R, Ziranu A, Oliva MS, Meluzio MC, Cauteruccio M, Maccauro G, Liuzza F, Saccomanno MF. The value of megaprostheses in non-oncological fractures in elderly patients: a shortterm results: a short-term result. Injury. 2022;53:1241–6.CrossRefPubMed Vitiello R, Ziranu A, Oliva MS, Meluzio MC, Cauteruccio M, Maccauro G, Liuzza F, Saccomanno MF. The value of megaprostheses in non-oncological fractures in elderly patients: a shortterm results: a short-term result. Injury. 2022;53:1241–6.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference El Ezzo O, Oliva MS, Cauteruccio M, Saracco M, Vitiello R, Maccauro G, Perisano C. Innovations in prevention of infections in oncological megaprostheses: a narrative review. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020;34(4):275–8.PubMed El Ezzo O, Oliva MS, Cauteruccio M, Saracco M, Vitiello R, Maccauro G, Perisano C. Innovations in prevention of infections in oncological megaprostheses: a narrative review. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020;34(4):275–8.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Megaprosthetic replacement in complex distal humerus fractures in elderly patients: a case series
Authors
Matteo Caredda
Luigi Cianni
Andrea De Fazio
Antonio Ziranu
Raffaele Vitiello
Giulio Maccauro
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04465-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2024 Go to the issue