Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

Perioperative pain after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection

Authors: Rikke Tolstrup, Jonas Amstrup Funder, Liselotte Lundbech, Niels Thomassen, Lene Hjerrild Iversen

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In order to improve the surgical treatment of rectal cancer, robot-assisted laparoscopy has been introduced. The robot has gained widespread use; however, the scientific basis for treatment of rectal cancer is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal resection cause less perioperative pain than standard laparoscopic resection measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS score) as well as morphine consumption.

Methods

Fifty-one patients were randomized to either laparoscopic or robot-assisted rectal resection at the Department of Surgery at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark. The intra-operative analgetic consumption was recorded prospectively and registered in patient records. Likewise all postoperative medicine administration including analgesia was recorded prospectively at the hospital medical charts. All morphine analogues were converted into equivalent oral morphine by a converter. Postoperative pain where measured by numeric rating scale (NRS) every hour at the postoperative care unit and three times a day at the ward.

Results

Opioid consumption during operation was significantly lower during robotic-assisted surgery than during laparoscopic surgery (p=0.0001). However, there were no differences in opioid consumption or NRS in the period of recovery. We found no differences in length of surgery between the two groups; however, ten patients from the laparoscopic group underwent conversion to open surgery compared to one from the robotic group (p=0.005). No significant difference between groups with respect to complications where found.

Conclusions

In the present study, we found that patients who underwent rectal cancer resection by robotic technique needed less analgetics during surgery than patients operated laparoscopically. We did, however, not find any difference in postoperative pain score or morphine consumption postoperatively between the robotic and laparoscopic group.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASSIC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2 CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASSIC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(05)66545-2 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Smith A, Smith J, Jayne DG (2006) Telerobotics: surgery for the 21st century. Surgery 24(2):74–78 Smith A, Smith J, Jayne DG (2006) Telerobotics: surgery for the 21st century. Surgery 24(2):74–78
12.
go back to reference Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, Tsang C, Barrie JM, Edling R, Garbett C, Guillou P, Holloway I, Howard H, Marshall H, McCabe C, Pavitt S, Quirke P, Rivers CS, Brown JM (2012 Feb) An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis 27(2):233–241CrossRef Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, Tsang C, Barrie JM, Edling R, Garbett C, Guillou P, Holloway I, Howard H, Marshall H, McCabe C, Pavitt S, Quirke P, Rivers CS, Brown JM (2012 Feb) An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis 27(2):233–241CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Ann Surg 244:931–937 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Ann Surg 244:931–937
14.
go back to reference Bland M (2000) An introduction to medical statistics, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York Bland M (2000) An introduction to medical statistics, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
16.
go back to reference Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gullà N, Noya G, Boselli C (2011) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Color Dis 14(4):e134–e156CrossRef Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gullà N, Noya G, Boselli C (2011) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Color Dis 14(4):e134–e156CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 24(318):1569–1580CrossRef Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 24(318):1569–1580CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perioperative pain after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection
Authors
Rikke Tolstrup
Jonas Amstrup Funder
Liselotte Lundbech
Niels Thomassen
Lene Hjerrild Iversen
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2943-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2018 Go to the issue