Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Original Article

An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer

Authors: Fiona J. Collinson, David G. Jayne, Alessio Pigazzi, Charles Tsang, Jennifer M. Barrie, Richard Edlin, Christopher Garbett, Pierre Guillou, Ivana Holloway, Helen Howard, Helen Marshall, Christopher McCabe, Sue Pavitt, Phil Quirke, Carly S. Rivers, Julia M. B. Brown

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There is growing enthusiasm for robotic-assisted laparoscopic operations across many surgical specialities, including colorectal surgery, often not supported by robust clinical or cost-effectiveness data. A proper assessment of this new technology is required, prior to widespread recommendation or implementation.

Methods/design

The ROLARR trial is a pan-world, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, superiority trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. It will investigate differences in terms of the rate of conversion to open operation, rate of pathological involvement of circumferential resection margin, 3-year local recurrence, disease-free and overall survival rates and also operative morbidity and mortality, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. The primary outcome measure is the rate of conversion to open operation. For 80% power at the 5% (two-sided) significance level, to identify a relative 50% reduction in open conversion rate (25% to 12.5%), 336 patients will be required. The target recruitment is 400 patients overall to allow loss to follow-up. Patients will be followed up at 30 days and 6 months post-operatively and then annually until 3 years after the last patient has been randomised.

Discussion

In many centres, robotic-assisted surgery is being implemented on the basis of theoretical advantages, which have yet to be confirmed in practice. Robotic surgery is an expensive health care provision and merits robust evaluation. The ROLARR trial is a pragmatic trial aiming to provide a comprehensive evaluation of both robotic-assisted and standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative resection of rectal cancer.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2 PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(05)66545-2 PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032651 CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa032651 CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645. doi:10.1002/bjs.7160 PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​7160 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758 PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​09.​7758 PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92(9):1124–1132. doi:10.1002/bjs.4989 PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92(9):1124–1132. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​4989 PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Taylor GW (2007) Minimally Invasive Robotic Association 2nd International Congress: the Union League Club, New York, NY, USA, 18–20 January 2007. Int J Med Robot 3(3):281–286. doi:10.1002/rcs.154 PubMedCrossRef Taylor GW (2007) Minimally Invasive Robotic Association 2nd International Congress: the Union League Club, New York, NY, USA, 18–20 January 2007. Int J Med Robot 3(3):281–286. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​154 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19(1):117–119. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-9004-9 PubMedCrossRef Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19(1):117–119. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-004-9004-9 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A, Udo J, Brolmann H, Kennedy RH, John H (2009) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23(2):438–443. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0202-8 PubMedCrossRef Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A, Udo J, Brolmann H, Kennedy RH, John H (2009) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23(2):438–443. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-008-0202-8 PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
22.
go back to reference Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1134-7 PubMedCrossRef Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1134-7 PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Biffi R, Garcia-Aguilar J, Baek JH (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-0909-3 PubMedCrossRef Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Biffi R, Garcia-Aguilar J, Baek JH (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-010-0909-3 PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Casciola L (2009) Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS 13(2):176–183PubMed Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Casciola L (2009) Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS 13(2):176–183PubMed
26.
go back to reference Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Chi HS, Cho CH (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22(7):1601–1608. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-9752-z PubMedCrossRef Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Chi HS, Cho CH (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22(7):1601–1608. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-008-9752-z PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Smets EM, Garssen B, Cull A, de Haes JC (1996) Application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 73(2):241–245PubMedCrossRef Smets EM, Garssen B, Cull A, de Haes JC (1996) Application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 73(2):241–245PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148(5):1549–1557, discussion 1564PubMed Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148(5):1549–1557, discussion 1564PubMed
32.
go back to reference Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6):822–830. doi:S0090-4295(97)00238-0 PubMedCrossRef Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6):822–830. doi:S0090-4295(97)00238-0 PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr (2000) The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208PubMedCrossRef Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr (2000) The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208PubMedCrossRef
34.
35.
Metadata
Title
An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer
Authors
Fiona J. Collinson
David G. Jayne
Alessio Pigazzi
Charles Tsang
Jennifer M. Barrie
Richard Edlin
Christopher Garbett
Pierre Guillou
Ivana Holloway
Helen Howard
Helen Marshall
Christopher McCabe
Sue Pavitt
Phil Quirke
Carly S. Rivers
Julia M. B. Brown
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1313-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2012 Go to the issue