Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Perineal Laceration | Original Article

Patient attitude and acceptance towards episiotomy during pregnancy before and after information provision: a questionnaire

Authors: James W. Alexander, Emmanuel Karantanis, Robin M Turner, Kate Faasse, Chelsea Watt

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Evidence regarding how women feel about episiotomies is not recorded in the literature. As the most common surgical procedure, there is a need to understand how women feel about episiotomy.

Methods

The primary outcome was to identify the percentage of women who would accept an episiotomy if required. A literature review was compiled to provide nulliparous women in their third trimester with evidence-based information about episiotomies and perineal tears. Questions eliciting demographics, pre-information level of anxiety and acceptance of episiotomy were asked. After reading the information sheets, anxiety and knowledge were assessed again. Changes in anxiety levels from pre- to post-information were investigated using paired samples t tests. Because anxiety was measured on a scale, we assessed potential departures from normality by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Questions also assessed the value women placed on this form of education.

Results

There were 105 responses, with 88% accepting episiotomy, 2% declining and 10% seeking more information to decide. Eighty-one percent of women agreed that the information provided helped them to understand more about childbirth and 62% agreed that they felt more comfortable with the birthing process after reading the material. There was a reduction in anxiety levels regarding episiotomies after reading information (p = 0.002) and perineal tears (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Most women will accept an episiotomy if required. Antenatal education about episiotomies is important to women and helps them feel more comfortable with the birthing process. Written information increases acceptance and reduces anxiety levels regarding episiotomies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clesse C, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, De Lavergne S, Hamlin S, Scheffler M. Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: comparative systematic review of changing practices. Health Care Women Int. 2018;39(6):644–62.CrossRef Clesse C, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, De Lavergne S, Hamlin S, Scheffler M. Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: comparative systematic review of changing practices. Health Care Women Int. 2018;39(6):644–62.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081.PubMed Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081.PubMed
5.
go back to reference De Leeuw J, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2008;115(1):104–8. De Leeuw J, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2008;115(1):104–8.
6.
go back to reference Van Bavel J, Hukkelhoven CWPM, de Vries C, Papatsonis DNM, de Vogel J, Roovers JWR, et al. The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):407–13. Van Bavel J, Hukkelhoven CWPM, de Vries C, Papatsonis DNM, de Vogel J, Roovers JWR, et al. The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):407–13.
7.
go back to reference Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25.CrossRef Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lowe NK. Self-efficacy for labor and childbirth fears in nulliparous pregnant women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;21(4):219–24.CrossRef Lowe NK. Self-efficacy for labor and childbirth fears in nulliparous pregnant women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;21(4):219–24.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rondung E, Thomtén J, Sundin Ö. Psychological perspectives on fear of childbirth. J Anxiety Disord. 2016;44:80–91.CrossRef Rondung E, Thomtén J, Sundin Ö. Psychological perspectives on fear of childbirth. J Anxiety Disord. 2016;44:80–91.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Areskog B, Kjessler B, Uddenberg N. Identification of women with significant fear of childbirth during late pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1982;13(2):98–107.CrossRef Areskog B, Kjessler B, Uddenberg N. Identification of women with significant fear of childbirth during late pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1982;13(2):98–107.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Räisänen S, Selander T, Cartwright R, Gissler M, Kramer MR, Laine K, et al. The Association of Episiotomy with obstetric anal sphincter injury–a population based matched cohort study. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107053. Räisänen S, Selander T, Cartwright R, Gissler M, Kramer MR, Laine K, et al. The Association of Episiotomy with obstetric anal sphincter injury–a population based matched cohort study. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107053.
18.
go back to reference Kalis V, Landsmanova J, Bednarova B, Karbanova J, Laine K, Rokyta Z. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112:220–4.CrossRef Kalis V, Landsmanova J, Bednarova B, Karbanova J, Laine K, Rokyta Z. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112:220–4.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(513):305–12.PubMedPubMedCentral Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(513):305–12.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Patel D, Nasir S, Elati A, Vernon G, Weeks A. Historical trends in the timing of informed consent for research into intrapartum complications. BJOG. 2012;119(3):361–5.CrossRef Patel D, Nasir S, Elati A, Vernon G, Weeks A. Historical trends in the timing of informed consent for research into intrapartum complications. BJOG. 2012;119(3):361–5.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hibbard J, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(2):207–14CrossRef Hibbard J, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(2):207–14CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient attitude and acceptance towards episiotomy during pregnancy before and after information provision: a questionnaire
Authors
James W. Alexander
Emmanuel Karantanis
Robin M Turner
Kate Faasse
Chelsea Watt
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04003-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 3/2020 Go to the issue