Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research

Peer relations scale for adolescents treated for substance use disorder: a factor analytic presentation

Authors: Ping Yao, James R Ciesla, Kathryn D Mazurek, Sherilynn F Spear

Published in: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The literature indicates that peer relations are an important aspect of the treatment and recovery of adolescents with substance use disorder (SUD). Unfortunately, no standard measure of peer relations exists. The objective of this research is to use exploratory factor analysis to examine the underlying factor structure of a 14-item peer relations scale for use in this treatment population.

Methods

Participants are 509 adolescents discharged from primary substance abuse treatment from 2003–2010. The data are from research conducted between six and twelve months post discharge via a 230-item questionnaire that included the 14-item peer relations scale. The scale has questions that assess the degree to which the adolescent's social contacts conform to norms of positive behavior and therefore foster non-use and recovery. The response rate was 62%.

Results

The scale was decomposed by principal component factor analysis. When the matrix was rotated by varimax a three factor solution explaining 99.99% of the common variance emerged. The first factor yielded ten items that measure association with peers who engage in positive versus delinquent social behavior (positive versus negative social behavior). The three items in the second factor specify association with peers who use versus those who don’t use drugs, and thereby encourage recovery and discourage drug use (drug use). The third and factor contained two items measuring the degree to which the recovering adolescent associates with new or previous friends (post treatment peer association).

Conclusions

This scale is useful as a standard measure in that it begins to identify the measurable dimensions of peer relations that influence sustaining post treatment recovery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dishion TJ, Owen LD: A longitudinal analysis of friendships and substance use: Bidirectional influence from adolescence to adulthood. Dev Psychol. 2002, 38: 480-491.CrossRefPubMed Dishion TJ, Owen LD: A longitudinal analysis of friendships and substance use: Bidirectional influence from adolescence to adulthood. Dev Psychol. 2002, 38: 480-491.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Garnier HE, Stein JA: An 18-year model of family and peer effects on adolescent drug use and delinquency. J Youth Adolesc. 2002, 31: 45-56. 10.1023/A:1014085016511.CrossRef Garnier HE, Stein JA: An 18-year model of family and peer effects on adolescent drug use and delinquency. J Youth Adolesc. 2002, 31: 45-56. 10.1023/A:1014085016511.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Passetti LL, Godley SH, White MK: Adolescents’ perceptions of friends during substance abuse treatment: A qualitative study. Contemp Drug Probl. 2008, 35: 99-114. Passetti LL, Godley SH, White MK: Adolescents’ perceptions of friends during substance abuse treatment: A qualitative study. Contemp Drug Probl. 2008, 35: 99-114.
4.
go back to reference Preston P, Goodfellow M: Cohort comparisons: Social learning explanations for alcohol use among adolescents and older adults. Addict Behav. 2006, 31: 2268-2283. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.005.CrossRefPubMed Preston P, Goodfellow M: Cohort comparisons: Social learning explanations for alcohol use among adolescents and older adults. Addict Behav. 2006, 31: 2268-2283. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.005.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Akers RL, Lee G: A longitudinal test of social learning theory: Adolescent Smoking. J of Drug Issues. 1996, 26: 317-343. Akers RL, Lee G: A longitudinal test of social learning theory: Adolescent Smoking. J of Drug Issues. 1996, 26: 317-343.
6.
go back to reference Spear S, Akers RL: Social learning variables and the risk of habitual smoking among adolescents: the Muscatine Study. Amer J of Prev Med. 1988, 4: 336-348. Spear S, Akers RL: Social learning variables and the risk of habitual smoking among adolescents: the Muscatine Study. Amer J of Prev Med. 1988, 4: 336-348.
7.
go back to reference Spear S, Ciesla J, Skala S, Kania E: Adolescents: Issues in recovery and relapse. Relapse andRecovery in Additions. 2001, Yale University Press, New Haven CT Spear S, Ciesla J, Skala S, Kania E: Adolescents: Issues in recovery and relapse. Relapse andRecovery in Additions. 2001, Yale University Press, New Haven CT
8.
go back to reference Tardy C: Social support measurement. Am J Community Psychol. 1985, 13: 187-202. 10.1007/BF00905728.CrossRef Tardy C: Social support measurement. Am J Community Psychol. 1985, 13: 187-202. 10.1007/BF00905728.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Uchino B: Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. J Behav Med. 2006, 29: 377-387. 10.1007/s10865-006-9056-5.CrossRefPubMed Uchino B: Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. J Behav Med. 2006, 29: 377-387. 10.1007/s10865-006-9056-5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bandura A: Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977, 84: 191-215.CrossRefPubMed Bandura A: Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977, 84: 191-215.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cohen S, Willis TA: Stress and social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985, 98: 310-357.CrossRefPubMed Cohen S, Willis TA: Stress and social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985, 98: 310-357.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference National Institute on Drug Abuse: Therapeutic community. 2002, NIH Publication, Bethesda MD, No. 02–4877 National Institute on Drug Abuse: Therapeutic community. 2002, NIH Publication, Bethesda MD, No. 02–4877
14.
go back to reference Jainchill N, Hawke J, Messina M: Post-treatment outcomes among adjudicated adolescent males and females in modified therapeutic community treatment. Subst Use Misuse. 2005, 40: 975-976. 10.1081/JA-200058857.CrossRefPubMed Jainchill N, Hawke J, Messina M: Post-treatment outcomes among adjudicated adolescent males and females in modified therapeutic community treatment. Subst Use Misuse. 2005, 40: 975-976. 10.1081/JA-200058857.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Williams RJ, Chang SY: Addition Centre Adolescent Research Group. A comprehensive and 5 comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes. Clin Psychol. 2000, 7: 138-166. Williams RJ, Chang SY: Addition Centre Adolescent Research Group. A comprehensive and 5 comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes. Clin Psychol. 2000, 7: 138-166.
16.
go back to reference Boisvert R, Martin L, Grosek M: Effectiveness of a peer-support community in addiction recovery: participation as intervention. Occup Ther Int. 2008, 15: 205-220. 10.1002/oti.257.CrossRefPubMed Boisvert R, Martin L, Grosek M: Effectiveness of a peer-support community in addiction recovery: participation as intervention. Occup Ther Int. 2008, 15: 205-220. 10.1002/oti.257.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Azrin N, Donohue B, Bedalel V: Youth drug abuse treatment: a controlled outcome study. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 1994, 3: 1-16.CrossRef Azrin N, Donohue B, Bedalel V: Youth drug abuse treatment: a controlled outcome study. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 1994, 3: 1-16.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ennett S, Bailey SL, Federman B: Social network characteristics associated with risky behaviors among runaway and homeless youth. J Health Soc Behav. 1999, 40: 63-78. 10.2307/2676379.CrossRefPubMed Ennett S, Bailey SL, Federman B: Social network characteristics associated with risky behaviors among runaway and homeless youth. J Health Soc Behav. 1999, 40: 63-78. 10.2307/2676379.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Winters KC, Stinchfield RD, Opland E: The effectiveness of the Minnesota Model approach in the treatment of adolescent drug abusers. Addiction. 2000, 95: 601-612. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95460111.x.CrossRefPubMed Winters KC, Stinchfield RD, Opland E: The effectiveness of the Minnesota Model approach in the treatment of adolescent drug abusers. Addiction. 2000, 95: 601-612. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95460111.x.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mason M: Social network characteristics of urban adolescents in brief substance abuse treatment. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2009, 18: 72-84.CrossRef Mason M: Social network characteristics of urban adolescents in brief substance abuse treatment. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2009, 18: 72-84.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ciesla JR, Spear SF: Nonresponse bias in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes research: implications for evaluating care. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2007, 16: 125-140. 10.1300/J029v16n03_07.CrossRef Ciesla JR, Spear SF: Nonresponse bias in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes research: implications for evaluating care. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2007, 16: 125-140. 10.1300/J029v16n03_07.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc: Base SAS® 9.2 Procedures guide: Statistical procedures. 2010, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, 3 SAS Institute Inc: Base SAS® 9.2 Procedures guide: Statistical procedures. 2010, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, 3
23.
go back to reference Kaiser HF: A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika. 1970, 35: 401-415. 10.1007/BF02291817.CrossRef Kaiser HF: A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika. 1970, 35: 401-415. 10.1007/BF02291817.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Costello AB, Osborn JW: Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005, 10: 1-9. Costello AB, Osborn JW: Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005, 10: 1-9.
25.
go back to reference Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ: Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psych Methods. 1999, 4: 272-299.CrossRef Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ: Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psych Methods. 1999, 4: 272-299.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ciesla JR, Yao P: Validation of a targeted peer relations scale for adolescents treated for substance use disorder: an application of Rasch modeling. Subst Abus Res Treat. 2011, 5: 1-10. Ciesla JR, Yao P: Validation of a targeted peer relations scale for adolescents treated for substance use disorder: an application of Rasch modeling. Subst Abus Res Treat. 2011, 5: 1-10.
27.
go back to reference Wright BD, Linacre JM, Gustafson JE, Martin-Loff P: Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measure Trans. 1994, 8: 370-371. Wright BD, Linacre JM, Gustafson JE, Martin-Loff P: Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measure Trans. 1994, 8: 370-371.
Metadata
Title
Peer relations scale for adolescents treated for substance use disorder: a factor analytic presentation
Authors
Ping Yao
James R Ciesla
Kathryn D Mazurek
Sherilynn F Spear
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1747-597X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-7-29

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 1/2012 Go to the issue