Top

Published in:

01-04-2011 | Professional Issues

Peer Observed Interaction and Structured Evaluation (POISE): A Canadian Experience with Peer Supervision for Genetic Counselors

Authors: Claire Goldsmith, Christina Honeywell, Gabrielle Mettler

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 2/2011

Abstract

Peer observation, while often used in other professions, has not been formally applied in genetic counseling. The objective of this study was to pilot a method of peer evaluation whereby genetic counselors observed, and were observed by, each other during patient interaction. All of the available genetic counselors participated in both rounds of the pilot study (six in round one, seven in round two). The genetic counselors that observed the session used an observation room. Most participants reported learning a new skill. Sensitivity to, and comfort with, the feedback process improved. We conclude that Peer-Observed Interaction and Structured Evaluation (POISE) provides an opportunity to refresh counseling approaches and develop feedback skills without causing undue team discord. This new approach to peer supervision in genetic counselling offers a live observation approach for genetic counsellor supervision.

Available only for authorised users

AGNC Supervision Working Group. (2007). Report from the UK and EIRE Association of Genetic Nurses and Counselors (AGNC) Supervision Working Group on Genetic Counselling Supervision. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 127–142.CrossRef

Benshoff, J. M. (1993). Peer supervision in counselor training. Clinical Supervisor, 11, 89–102.CrossRef

Borders, L. D. (1991). A systematic approach to peer group supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 6, 248–252.

Champe, J., & Kleist, D. M. (2003). Live supervision: a review of the research. The Family Journal: Counselling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 11, 268–275.

Christensen, T., & Kline, W. (2001). The qualitative exploration of process-sensitive peer group supervision. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 26, 81–99.CrossRef

Clarke, A., Parsons, E., & Williams, A. (1996). Outcomes and process in genetic counselling. Clinical Genetics, 50, 462–469.PubMedCrossRef

Claveirole, A., & Mathers, M. (2003). Peer supervision: an experimental scheme for nurse lecturers. Nurse Education Today, 23, 51–57.PubMedCrossRef

Counselman, E. F., & Weber, R. L. (2004). Organizing and maintaining peer supervision groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 54, 125–143.PubMedCrossRef

Dancer, S., Johnson, T., Zauner, J., & Burch, C. (1997). Peer evaluation: a visual picture. Nursing Management, 28, 57–59.PubMed

Dudding, C. C., & Justice, L. M. (2004). An E-supervision model: videoconferencing as a clinical training tool. Communications Disorder Quarterly, 25, 145–151.CrossRef

Ends, J. (1983). Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA, 250, 777–781.CrossRef

Gillam, S. L., & Crutchfield, L. B. (2001). Collaborative group supervision of practicum students and interns. Clinical Supervisor, 20, 49–60.CrossRef

Heckman-Stone, C. (2003). Trainee preferences for feedback and evaluation in clinical supervision. Clinical Supervisor, 22, 21–33.CrossRef

Hendrickson, S. M., Veach, P. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2002). A qualitative investigation of student and supervisor perceptions of live supervision in genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11, 25–49.CrossRef

Hiller, E., & Rosenfield, J. M. (2000). The experience of leader-led peer supervision: genetic counselor’s perspectives. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9, 399–410.CrossRef

Hurt, D. J., & Mattox, R. J. (1991). Supervisor feedback using a dual-cassette recorder. Clinical Supervisor, 8, 169–172.CrossRef

Kennedy, A. (2000a). Supervision for practicing genetic counselors: an overview of models. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9, 379–390.CrossRef

Kennedy, A. (2000b). A leader-led supervision group as a model for practicing genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9, 391–397.CrossRef

Kessler, S. (2000). Closing thoughts on supervision. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9, 431–434.CrossRef

Larson, J. L., & Herrick, C. (1996). Peer review in a shared governance model. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing, 11, 317–323.PubMedCrossRef

Lindh, H. L., Veach, P. M., Cikanek, C., & LeRoy, B. S. (2003). A survey of clinical supervision in genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 23–41.CrossRef

Littrell, J. M., Lee-Borden, N., & Lorenz, J. (1979). A developmental framework for counseling supervision. Counselor Education & Supervision, 19, 129–136.

McCarthy, P., & LeRoy, B. S. (1998). Student supervision. In D. L. Baker, J. L. Schuette, & W. R. Uhlmann (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling (pp. 295–319). New York: Wiley.

Thomasgard, M., Warfield, J., & Williams, R. (2004). Improving communication between health and infant mental health professionals utilizing ongoing collaborative peer supervision groups. Infant Mental Health Journal, 25, 194–218.CrossRef

Vuorinen, R., Tarkka, M., & Meretoja, R. (2000). Peer evaluation in nurses’ professional development: a pilot study to investigate the issues. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 9, 273–281.PubMedCrossRef

Wagner, C. A., & Smith, J. P., Jr. (1979). Peer supervision: toward more effective training. Counselor Education & Supervision, 18, 288–293.

Weil, J. (2000). Psychosocial genetic counseling. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zahm, K. W., Veach, P. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2008). An investigation of genetic counselor experience in peer group supervision. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1, 220–233.CrossRef

Title: Peer Observed Interaction and Structured Evaluation (POISE): A Canadian Experience with Peer Supervision for Genetic Counselors
Authors: Claire Goldsmith
Christina Honeywell
Gabrielle Mettler
Publication date: 01-04-2011
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-010-9341-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Peer Observed Interaction and Structured Evaluation (POISE): A Canadian Experience with Peer Supervision for Genetic Counselors

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Genetic Testing Likelihood: The Impact of Abortion Views and Quality of Life Information on Women’s Decisions

Genetic Counselors’ Experiences with Adolescent Patients in Prenatal Genetic Counseling

Communication of Genetic Information by Other Health Professionals: The Role of the Genetic Counsellor in Specialist Clinics

Genetic Counseling for Early-onset Familial Alzheimer Disease in Large Aboriginal Kindred from a Remote Community in British Columbia: Unique Challenges and Possible Solutions

Accuracy of Reported Family History and Effectiveness of Medical Record Requests in Genetic Counseling for Alzheimer Disease

Genetic Risk, Perceived Risk, and Cancer Worry in Daughters of Breast Cancer Patients