Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Pediatrics | Original Article

Pediatric radiologist-driven didactics for a pediatric residency program: a quality initiative

Authors: Cory M. Pfeifer, Samantha M. Castillo

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pediatric residents exhibit knowledge gaps in appropriateness of imaging utilization.

Objective

This study evaluates the value of radiologist-driven imaging education in a pediatric residency program. The primary goals of this educational program were to provide pediatric residents with resources such as the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria, support optimal resource utilization and patient care, increase resident understanding of radiation risk, and determine the value of integrating radiologists into pediatric education.

Materials and methods

A needs assessment was performed in which the chief residents of a large pediatric program were surveyed. The consensus of chief residents was that a four-part lecture series delivered by a pediatric radiology fellow would be beneficial to the pediatric residents. Topics included general radiation risk as well as basic imaging topics in the chest, abdomen, neurological system, extremities and vasculature. Each lecture integrated appropriate ordering, ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable)/Image Gently, and basic image interpretation. Residents were asked, using a Likert scale, to rate their understanding of radiation risk, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria, and other topics of interest before and after each lecture. Pediatric residents were given a 10-item quiz before and after the lecture series to assess their knowledge regarding the best test to order in clinical scenarios.

Results

The average pre-lecture score for knowledge of radiation risk was 3.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.02–3.51) out of 5, which improved to 4.27 (95% CI: 4.09–4.57) post-lecture. There was an increase in understanding of ACR appropriateness, with pre-lecture rating of knowledge increasing from 1.91 (95% CI 1.54–2.29) out of 5 to 3.61 (95% CI 3.33–3.90) post-lecture. The residents averaged 82.7% (95% CI 77.3%–88.1%) on the appropriateness pre-test and 93.8% (95% CI 90.3%–97.2%) on the post-test. Residents provided positive feedback upon conclusion of the program and reported a beneficial effect on their education.

Conclusion

A radiologist-driven lecture series in a pediatric residency can improve resident understanding of appropriate ordering practices and radiation risk. Radiologist participation in pediatric residency training is well-received.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Levin DC, Rao VM (2013) The declining radiology job market: how should radiologists respond? J Am Coll Radiol 10:231–233CrossRef Levin DC, Rao VM (2013) The declining radiology job market: how should radiologists respond? J Am Coll Radiol 10:231–233CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Prezzia C, Vorona G, Greenspan R (2013) Fourth-year medical student opinions and basic knowledge regarding the field of radiology. Acad Radiol 20:272–283CrossRef Prezzia C, Vorona G, Greenspan R (2013) Fourth-year medical student opinions and basic knowledge regarding the field of radiology. Acad Radiol 20:272–283CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vijayasarathi A, Hawkins CM, Hughes DR et al (2015) How much do common imaging studies cost? A nationwide survey of radiology trainees. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:929–935CrossRef Vijayasarathi A, Hawkins CM, Hughes DR et al (2015) How much do common imaging studies cost? A nationwide survey of radiology trainees. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:929–935CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Retrouvey M, Trace AP, Shaves S (2016) Radiologic knowledge and ordering habits of clinical residents: ACR appropriateness criteria awareness and perceptions. J Am Coll Radiol 13:725–729CrossRef Retrouvey M, Trace AP, Shaves S (2016) Radiologic knowledge and ordering habits of clinical residents: ACR appropriateness criteria awareness and perceptions. J Am Coll Radiol 13:725–729CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gunderman RB, Bettmann M, Davis LP (2007) Promoting educational innovation: lessons from the request for proposals for ACR appropriateness criteria usage in medical education. J Am Coll Radiol 4:919–924CrossRef Gunderman RB, Bettmann M, Davis LP (2007) Promoting educational innovation: lessons from the request for proposals for ACR appropriateness criteria usage in medical education. J Am Coll Radiol 4:919–924CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pfeifer CM (2019) The value of radiology resident participation in internal medicine morbidity and mortality conferences at a small center of graduate medical education. Curr Prob Diag Radiol 48:305–307CrossRef Pfeifer CM (2019) The value of radiology resident participation in internal medicine morbidity and mortality conferences at a small center of graduate medical education. Curr Prob Diag Radiol 48:305–307CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gispen FE, Magid D (2016) Assessing medical student knowledge of imaging modality selection before and after a general radiology elective: a comparison of MS-IIs, MS-IIIs, and MS-IVs. Acad Radiol 23:643–650CrossRef Gispen FE, Magid D (2016) Assessing medical student knowledge of imaging modality selection before and after a general radiology elective: a comparison of MS-IIs, MS-IIIs, and MS-IVs. Acad Radiol 23:643–650CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leschied JR, Knoepp US, Hoff CN et al (2013) Emergency radiology elective improves second-year medical students’ perceived confidence and knowledge of appropriate imaging utilization. Acad Radiol 20:1168–1176CrossRef Leschied JR, Knoepp US, Hoff CN et al (2013) Emergency radiology elective improves second-year medical students’ perceived confidence and knowledge of appropriate imaging utilization. Acad Radiol 20:1168–1176CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Collins J, Riebe JD, Albanese MA et al (1999) Medical students and radiology residents: can they learn as effectively with the same educational materials? Acad Radiol 6:691–695CrossRef Collins J, Riebe JD, Albanese MA et al (1999) Medical students and radiology residents: can they learn as effectively with the same educational materials? Acad Radiol 6:691–695CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dillon JE, Slanetz PJ (2010) Teaching evidence-based imaging in the radiology clerkship using the ACR appropriateness criteria. Acad Radiol 17:912–916CrossRef Dillon JE, Slanetz PJ (2010) Teaching evidence-based imaging in the radiology clerkship using the ACR appropriateness criteria. Acad Radiol 17:912–916CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Straus CM, Webb EM, Kondo KL et al (2014) Medical student radiology education: summary and recommendations from a national survey of medical school and radiology department leadership. J Am Coll Radiol 11:606–610CrossRef Straus CM, Webb EM, Kondo KL et al (2014) Medical student radiology education: summary and recommendations from a national survey of medical school and radiology department leadership. J Am Coll Radiol 11:606–610CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schiller PT, Phillips AW, Straus CM (2018) Radiology education in medical school and residency. the views and needs of program directors Acad Radiol 25:1333–1343PubMed Schiller PT, Phillips AW, Straus CM (2018) Radiology education in medical school and residency. the views and needs of program directors Acad Radiol 25:1333–1343PubMed
Metadata
Title
Pediatric radiologist-driven didactics for a pediatric residency program: a quality initiative
Authors
Cory M. Pfeifer
Samantha M. Castillo
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04559-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Pediatric Radiology 3/2020 Go to the issue