Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Pediatrics | Review

Identifying the data elements and functionalities of clinical decision support systems to administer medication for neonates and pediatrics: a systematic literature review

Authors: Somaye Norouzi, Zahra Galavi, Leila Ahmadian

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient safety is a central healthcare policy worldwide. Adverse drug events (ADE) are among the main threats to patient safety. Children are at a higher risk of ADE in each stage of medication management process. ADE rate is high in the administration stage, as the final stage of preventing medication errors in pediatrics and neonates. The most effective way to reduce ADE rate is using medication administration clinical decision support systems (MACDSSs). The present study reviewed the literature on MACDSS for neonates and pediatrics. It identified and classified the data elements that mapped onto the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard and the functionalities of these systems to guide future research.

Methods

PubMed/ MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases were searched from 1995 to June 31, 2021. Studies that addressed developing or applying medication administration software for neonates and pediatrics were included. Two authors reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full texts. The quality of eligible studies was assessed based on the level of evidence. The extracted data elements were mapped onto the FHIR standard.

Results

In the initial search, 4,856 papers were identified. After removing duplicates, 3,761 titles, and abstracts were screened. Finally, 56 full-text papers remained for evaluation. The full-text review of papers led to the retention of 10 papers which met the eligibility criteria. In addition, two papers from the reference lists were included. A total number of 12 papers were included for analysis. Six papers were categorized as high-level evidence. Only three papers evaluated their systems in a real environment. A variety of data elements and functionalities could be observed. Overall, 84 unique data elements were extracted from the included papers. The analysis of reported functionalities showed that 18 functionalities were implemented in these systems.

Conclusion

Identifying the data elements and functionalities as a roadmap by developers can significantly improve MACDSS performance. Though many CDSSs have been developed for different medication processes in neonates and pediatrics, few have actually evaluated MACDSSs in reality. Therefore, further research is needed on the application and evaluation of MACDSSs in the real environment.

Protocol Registration

(dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bwbwpape).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Janmano P, Chaichanawirote U, Kongkaew C. Analysis of medication consultation networks and reporting medication errors: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:221.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Janmano P, Chaichanawirote U, Kongkaew C. Analysis of medication consultation networks and reporting medication errors: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:221.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hug BL, Keohane C, Seger DL, Yoon C, Bates DW. The costs of adverse drug events in community hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38:120–6.PubMed Hug BL, Keohane C, Seger DL, Yoon C, Bates DW. The costs of adverse drug events in community hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38:120–6.PubMed
4.
go back to reference de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2008;17:216–23.CrossRef de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2008;17:216–23.CrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Tolley CL, Forde NE, Coffey KL, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Husband AK, et al. Factors contributing to medication errors made when using computerized order entry in pediatrics: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25:575–84.PubMedCrossRef Tolley CL, Forde NE, Coffey KL, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Husband AK, et al. Factors contributing to medication errors made when using computerized order entry in pediatrics: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25:575–84.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Conroy S, Sweis D, Planner C, Yeung V, Collier J, Haines L, et al. Interventions to reduce dosing errors in children. Drug Saf. 2007;30:1111–25.PubMedCrossRef Conroy S, Sweis D, Planner C, Yeung V, Collier J, Haines L, et al. Interventions to reduce dosing errors in children. Drug Saf. 2007;30:1111–25.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hicks RW, Cousins DD, Williams RL. Selected medication-error data from USP’s MEDMARX program for 2002. Am J Heal Pharm. 2004;61:993–1000.CrossRef Hicks RW, Cousins DD, Williams RL. Selected medication-error data from USP’s MEDMARX program for 2002. Am J Heal Pharm. 2004;61:993–1000.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Berdot S, Gillaizeau F, Caruba T, Prognon P, Durieux P, Sabatier B. Drug administration errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e68856.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Berdot S, Gillaizeau F, Caruba T, Prognon P, Durieux P, Sabatier B. Drug administration errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e68856.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1409.PubMedCrossRef Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1409.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kazemi A, Ellenius J, Pourasghar F, Tofighi S, Salehi A, Amanati A, et al. The effect of computerized physician order entry and decision support system on medication errors in the neonatal ward: experiences from an Iranian teaching hospital. J Med Syst. 2011;35:25–37.PubMedCrossRef Kazemi A, Ellenius J, Pourasghar F, Tofighi S, Salehi A, Amanati A, et al. The effect of computerized physician order entry and decision support system on medication errors in the neonatal ward: experiences from an Iranian teaching hospital. J Med Syst. 2011;35:25–37.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nguyen MNR, Mosel C, Grzeskowiak LE. Interventions to reduce medication errors in neonatal care: a systematic review. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018;9:123–55.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen MNR, Mosel C, Grzeskowiak LE. Interventions to reduce medication errors in neonatal care: a systematic review. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018;9:123–55.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference van Rosse F, Maat B, Rademaker CMA, van Vught AJ, Egberts ACG, Bollen CW. The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication prescription errors and clinical outcome in pediatric and intensive care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1184–90.PubMedCrossRef van Rosse F, Maat B, Rademaker CMA, van Vught AJ, Egberts ACG, Bollen CW. The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication prescription errors and clinical outcome in pediatric and intensive care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1184–90.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Moss J, Berner E, Bothe O, Rymarchuk I. Intravenous medication administration in intensive care: opportunities for technological solutions. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association; 2008. p. 495–499. PMID: 18998790. Moss J, Berner E, Bothe O, Rymarchuk I. Intravenous medication administration in intensive care: opportunities for technological solutions. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association; 2008. p. 495–499. PMID: 18998790.
15.
go back to reference Souza-Pereira L, Pombo N, Ouhbi S, Felizardo V, Garcia N. Clinical decision support systems for chronic diseases: a Systematic literature review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;195: 105565.PubMedCrossRef Souza-Pereira L, Pombo N, Ouhbi S, Felizardo V, Garcia N. Clinical decision support systems for chronic diseases: a Systematic literature review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;195: 105565.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rinke ML, Bundy DG, Velasquez CA, Rao S, Zerhouni Y, Lobner K, et al. Interventions to reduce pediatric medication errors: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014;134:338–60.PubMedCrossRef Rinke ML, Bundy DG, Velasquez CA, Rao S, Zerhouni Y, Lobner K, et al. Interventions to reduce pediatric medication errors: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014;134:338–60.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Berdot S, Roudot M, Schramm C, Katsahian S, Durieux P, Sabatier B. Interventions to reduce nurses’ medication administration errors in inpatient settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;53:342–50.PubMedCrossRef Berdot S, Roudot M, Schramm C, Katsahian S, Durieux P, Sabatier B. Interventions to reduce nurses’ medication administration errors in inpatient settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;53:342–50.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Moore EC, Tolley CL, Bates DW, Slight SP. A systematic review of the impact of health information technology on nurses’ time. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2020;27:798–807.CrossRef Moore EC, Tolley CL, Bates DW, Slight SP. A systematic review of the impact of health information technology on nurses’ time. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2020;27:798–807.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gates PJ, Meyerson SA, Baysari MT, Westbrook JI. The prevalence of dose errors among paediatric patients in hospital wards with and without health information technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Saf. 2019;42:13–25.PubMedCrossRef Gates PJ, Meyerson SA, Baysari MT, Westbrook JI. The prevalence of dose errors among paediatric patients in hospital wards with and without health information technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Saf. 2019;42:13–25.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kim MO, Coiera E, Magrabi F. Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2017;24:246–50.CrossRef Kim MO, Coiera E, Magrabi F. Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2017;24:246–50.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jones SS, Rudin RS, Perry T, Shekelle PG. Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:48–54.PubMedCrossRef Jones SS, Rudin RS, Perry T, Shekelle PG. Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:48–54.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tummers J, Tekinerdogan B, Tobi H, Catal C, Schalk B. Obstacles and features of health information systems: a systematic literature review. Comput Biol Med. 2021;137: 104785.PubMedCrossRef Tummers J, Tekinerdogan B, Tobi H, Catal C, Schalk B. Obstacles and features of health information systems: a systematic literature review. Comput Biol Med. 2021;137: 104785.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pourahmadi M, Delavari S, Koes B, Keshtkar A, Nazemipour M, Mansournia MA. How to formulate appropriate review questions for systematic reviews in sports medicine and rehabilitation? Br J Sports Med. 2021;55:1246–7.PubMedCrossRef Pourahmadi M, Delavari S, Koes B, Keshtkar A, Nazemipour M, Mansournia MA. How to formulate appropriate review questions for systematic reviews in sports medicine and rehabilitation? Br J Sports Med. 2021;55:1246–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kim H-Y, Park H-A. Development and evaluation of data entry templates based on the entity-attribute-value model for clinical decision support of pressure ulcer wound management. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81:485–92.PubMedCrossRef Kim H-Y, Park H-A. Development and evaluation of data entry templates based on the entity-attribute-value model for clinical decision support of pressure ulcer wound management. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81:485–92.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1-34.PubMedCrossRef Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1-34.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366: l4898.PubMedCrossRef Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366: l4898.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Poissant L. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2005;12:505–16.CrossRef Poissant L. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2005;12:505–16.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Stetler CB, Morsi D, Rucki S, Broughton S, Corrigan B, Fitzgerald J, et al. Utilization-focused integrative reviews in a nursing service. Appl Nurs Res. 1998;11:195–206.PubMedCrossRef Stetler CB, Morsi D, Rucki S, Broughton S, Corrigan B, Fitzgerald J, et al. Utilization-focused integrative reviews in a nursing service. Appl Nurs Res. 1998;11:195–206.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ellis J, Parush A, Taing M, Campbell C, Des PEM, Chiu C, et al. Preventing medication errors with high alert drugs: testing the iDoseCheck. Can J Nurs Inform. 2012;7:1–10. Ellis J, Parush A, Taing M, Campbell C, Des PEM, Chiu C, et al. Preventing medication errors with high alert drugs: testing the iDoseCheck. Can J Nurs Inform. 2012;7:1–10.
36.
go back to reference Dodson CH, Baker E. Focus group testing of a mobile app for pharmacogeneticguided dosing. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2021;33:205–10.CrossRef Dodson CH, Baker E. Focus group testing of a mobile app for pharmacogeneticguided dosing. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2021;33:205–10.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Siebert JN, Ehrler F, Combescure C, Lovis C, Haddad K, Hugon F, et al. A mobile device application to reduce medication errors and time to drug delivery during simulated paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a multicentre, randomised, controlled, crossover trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal. 2019;3:303–11.CrossRef Siebert JN, Ehrler F, Combescure C, Lovis C, Haddad K, Hugon F, et al. A mobile device application to reduce medication errors and time to drug delivery during simulated paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a multicentre, randomised, controlled, crossover trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal. 2019;3:303–11.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bury J, Hurt C, Roy A, Cheesman L, Bradburn M, Cross S, et al. LISA: a web-based decision-support system for trial management of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2005;129:746–54.PubMedCrossRef Bury J, Hurt C, Roy A, Cheesman L, Bradburn M, Cross S, et al. LISA: a web-based decision-support system for trial management of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2005;129:746–54.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Zahn J, Wimmer S, Rödle W, Toni I, Sedlmayr B, Prokosch H-U, et al. Development and evaluation of a web-based paediatric drug information system for Germany. Pharmacy (Basel). 2021;9:8.PubMedCrossRef Zahn J, Wimmer S, Rödle W, Toni I, Sedlmayr B, Prokosch H-U, et al. Development and evaluation of a web-based paediatric drug information system for Germany. Pharmacy (Basel). 2021;9:8.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Levy MA, Giuse DA, Eck C, Holder G, Lippard G, Cartwright J, et al. Integrated information systems for electronic chemotherapy medication administration. J Oncol Pract. 2011;7:226–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Levy MA, Giuse DA, Eck C, Holder G, Lippard G, Cartwright J, et al. Integrated information systems for electronic chemotherapy medication administration. J Oncol Pract. 2011;7:226–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Reynolds TL, DeLucia PR, Esquibel KA, Gage T, Wheeler NJ, Randell JA, et al. Evaluating a handheld decision support device in pediatric intensive care settings. JAMIA open. 2019;2:49–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Reynolds TL, DeLucia PR, Esquibel KA, Gage T, Wheeler NJ, Randell JA, et al. Evaluating a handheld decision support device in pediatric intensive care settings. JAMIA open. 2019;2:49–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ni Y, Lingren T, Hall ES, Leonard M, Melton K, Kirkendall ES, et al. Designing and evaluating an automated system for real-time medication administration error detection in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2018;25:555–63.CrossRef Ni Y, Lingren T, Hall ES, Leonard M, Melton K, Kirkendall ES, et al. Designing and evaluating an automated system for real-time medication administration error detection in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2018;25:555–63.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Damhoff HN, Kuhn RJ, Baker-Justice SN. Medication preparation in pediatric emergencies: comparison of a web-based, standard-dose, bar code-enabled system and a traditional approach. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther JPPT Off J PPAG. 2014;19:174–81. Damhoff HN, Kuhn RJ, Baker-Justice SN. Medication preparation in pediatric emergencies: comparison of a web-based, standard-dose, bar code-enabled system and a traditional approach. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther JPPT Off J PPAG. 2014;19:174–81.
44.
go back to reference Ateya MB, Aiyagari R, Moran C, Singer K. Insulin bolus calculator in a pediatric hospital safety and user perceptions. Appl Clin Inform. 2017;8:529–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ateya MB, Aiyagari R, Moran C, Singer K. Insulin bolus calculator in a pediatric hospital safety and user perceptions. Appl Clin Inform. 2017;8:529–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Parush A, Haim N, Jaffe E, Wacht O. Design and test of a graphic medication dosage calculator in paramedic practice with children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022;38:e343–8.PubMedCrossRef Parush A, Haim N, Jaffe E, Wacht O. Design and test of a graphic medication dosage calculator in paramedic practice with children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022;38:e343–8.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Siebert JN, Ehrler F, Combescure C, Lacroix L, Haddad K, Sanchez O, et al. A mobile device app to reduce time to drug delivery and medication errors during simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19: e31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Siebert JN, Ehrler F, Combescure C, Lacroix L, Haddad K, Sanchez O, et al. A mobile device app to reduce time to drug delivery and medication errors during simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19: e31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Ehrler F, Siebert JN. PedAMINES: a disruptive mHealth app to tackle paediatric medication errors. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20335–w20335.PubMedCrossRef Ehrler F, Siebert JN. PedAMINES: a disruptive mHealth app to tackle paediatric medication errors. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20335–w20335.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Hagberg H, Siebert J, Gervaix A, Daehne P, Lovis C, Manzano S, et al. Improving drugs administration safety in pediatric resuscitation using mobile technology. In: Nursing Informatics 2016. IOS Press; 2016. p. 656–7. PMID: 27332296. Hagberg H, Siebert J, Gervaix A, Daehne P, Lovis C, Manzano S, et al. Improving drugs administration safety in pediatric resuscitation using mobile technology. In: Nursing Informatics 2016. IOS Press; 2016. p. 656–7. PMID: 27332296.
49.
go back to reference Bury J, Hurt C, Roy A, Bradburn M, Cross S, Fox J, et al. A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of LISA, a decision support system for chemotherapy dosing in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):197–201.PubMed Bury J, Hurt C, Roy A, Bradburn M, Cross S, Fox J, et al. A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of LISA, a decision support system for chemotherapy dosing in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):197–201.PubMed
50.
go back to reference Shortliffe EH, Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ, Cimino JJ. Biomedical Informatics. London: Springer; 2014.CrossRef Shortliffe EH, Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ, Cimino JJ. Biomedical Informatics. London: Springer; 2014.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference DEEDS Writing Committee, Pollock DA, Adams DL, Bernardo LM, Bradley V, Brandt MD, et al. Data elements for emergency department systems, release 1 0 (DEEDS): A summary report. J Emerg Nurs. 1998;24:35–44.CrossRef DEEDS Writing Committee, Pollock DA, Adams DL, Bernardo LM, Bradley V, Brandt MD, et al. Data elements for emergency department systems, release 1 0 (DEEDS): A summary report. J Emerg Nurs. 1998;24:35–44.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Dissanayake PI, Colicchio TK, Cimino JJ. Using clinical reasoning ontologies to make smarter clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and data synthesis. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2020;27:159–74.CrossRef Dissanayake PI, Colicchio TK, Cimino JJ. Using clinical reasoning ontologies to make smarter clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and data synthesis. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2020;27:159–74.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Miller K, Mosby D, Capan M, Kowalski R, Ratwani R, Noaiseh Y, et al. Interface, information, interaction: a narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical decision support. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2018;25:585–92.CrossRef Miller K, Mosby D, Capan M, Kowalski R, Ratwani R, Noaiseh Y, et al. Interface, information, interaction: a narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical decision support. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2018;25:585–92.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA, Hashmat B, Koppel R, Overhage JM, et al. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2013;20:e2-8.CrossRef Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA, Hashmat B, Koppel R, Overhage JM, et al. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2013;20:e2-8.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Khajouei R, Jaspers MWM. CPOE system design aspects and their qualitative effect on usability. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:309.PubMed Khajouei R, Jaspers MWM. CPOE system design aspects and their qualitative effect on usability. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:309.PubMed
57.
go back to reference Shahmoradi L, Safdari R, Ahmadi H, Zahmatkeshan M. Clinical decision support systems-based interventions to improve medication outcomes: a systematic literature review on features and effects. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021;35:27.PubMedPubMedCentral Shahmoradi L, Safdari R, Ahmadi H, Zahmatkeshan M. Clinical decision support systems-based interventions to improve medication outcomes: a systematic literature review on features and effects. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021;35:27.PubMedPubMedCentral
58.
go back to reference Tsopra R, Jais J-P, Venot A, Duclos C. Comparison of two kinds of interface, based on guided navigation or usability principles, for improving the adoption of computerized decision support systems: application to the prescription of antibiotics. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2014;21:e107–16.CrossRef Tsopra R, Jais J-P, Venot A, Duclos C. Comparison of two kinds of interface, based on guided navigation or usability principles, for improving the adoption of computerized decision support systems: application to the prescription of antibiotics. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2014;21:e107–16.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Horsky J, Schiff GD, Johnston D, Mercincavage L, Bell D, Middleton B. Interface design principles for usable decision support: a targeted review of best practices for clinical prescribing interventions. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45:1202–16.PubMedCrossRef Horsky J, Schiff GD, Johnston D, Mercincavage L, Bell D, Middleton B. Interface design principles for usable decision support: a targeted review of best practices for clinical prescribing interventions. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45:1202–16.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Khajouei R, Jaspers MWM. The impact of CPOE medication systems’ design aspects on usability, workflow and medication orders. Methods Inf Med. 2010;49:03–19.CrossRef Khajouei R, Jaspers MWM. The impact of CPOE medication systems’ design aspects on usability, workflow and medication orders. Methods Inf Med. 2010;49:03–19.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Identifying the data elements and functionalities of clinical decision support systems to administer medication for neonates and pediatrics: a systematic literature review
Authors
Somaye Norouzi
Zahra Galavi
Leila Ahmadian
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Pediatrics
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02355-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2023 Go to the issue