Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Pediatric Urology | Original Article

Do post-operative phone calls enhance family satisfaction and outcomes after outpatient pediatric urological surgeries? A prospective study

Authors: Jin K. Kim, Min Joon Lee, Michael E. Chua, Jessica M. Ming, Armando J. Lorenzo, Walid A. Farhat, Darius J. Bagli, Frank Papanikolaou, Martin A. Koyle

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

This study assesses whether post-operative check-in phone calls (POPC) performed within 48 h of outpatient pediatric urological surgeries by a non-medical professional (NMP) would increase patient/family satisfaction and minimize extraneous resource use by increasing email/telephone communication, while reducing emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days of that procedure.

Methods

Families of patients undergoing ambulatory pediatric urology surgeries were enrolled over 8 weeks. Group 1 did not receive POPC. Group 2 received a POPC within 48 h of their operation by a NMP. Both groups received a phone-call survey 2 weeks after surgery to assess families’ perioperative satisfaction.

Results

In total, 74 families were enrolled (Group 1 = 44, Group 2 = 31). The response rates to phone surveys for Groups 1 and 2 were 59.1% and 77.4%, respectively. POPC did not improve perioperative satisfaction, nor did it significantly promote the use of nursing email/telephone communication (19.2% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.128) or reduce ED visits (15.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.111). However, all families in Group 2 thought POPC was timed appropriately and 79.1% perceived it to be helpful in reducing post-operative anxiety.

Conclusion

POPC by a NMP within 48 h of surgery may not affect perioperative satisfaction of families of patients undergoing same-day pediatric urology surgery but may have an impact in reducing post-operative anxiety.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hughes RG (2008) Tools and strategies for quality improvement and patient safety. In: Hughes RG (ed). Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses: Rockville (MD) Hughes RG (2008) Tools and strategies for quality improvement and patient safety. In: Hughes RG (ed). Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses: Rockville (MD)
2.
go back to reference Loewenstein SN, Pittelkow E, Hadad I, Adkinson JM (2019) Effects of postoperative physician phone calls for hand and wrist fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. P Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(8 Suppl):92–93CrossRef Loewenstein SN, Pittelkow E, Hadad I, Adkinson JM (2019) Effects of postoperative physician phone calls for hand and wrist fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. P Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(8 Suppl):92–93CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Daniels SA, Kelly A, Bachand D, Simeoni E, Hall C, Hofer SM et al (2016) Call to care: the impact of 24-hour postdischarge telephone follow-up in the treatment of surgical day care patients. Am J Surg 211(5):963–967CrossRef Daniels SA, Kelly A, Bachand D, Simeoni E, Hall C, Hofer SM et al (2016) Call to care: the impact of 24-hour postdischarge telephone follow-up in the treatment of surgical day care patients. Am J Surg 211(5):963–967CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shupe R (2014) Post-visit phone calls: reducing preventable readmissions and improving the patient experience. J Nurs Educ Pract 4(4):45–51 Shupe R (2014) Post-visit phone calls: reducing preventable readmissions and improving the patient experience. J Nurs Educ Pract 4(4):45–51
5.
go back to reference Le T, Drolet J, Parayno E, Rosmus C, Castiglione S (2007) Follow-up phone calls after pediatric ambulatory surgery for tonsillectomy: what can we learn from families? J Perianesth Nurs 22(4):256–264CrossRef Le T, Drolet J, Parayno E, Rosmus C, Castiglione S (2007) Follow-up phone calls after pediatric ambulatory surgery for tonsillectomy: what can we learn from families? J Perianesth Nurs 22(4):256–264CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Caljouw MA, van Beuzekom M, Boer F (2008) Patient’s satisfaction with perioperative care: development, validation, and application of a questionnaire. Br J Anaesth 100(5):637–644CrossRef Caljouw MA, van Beuzekom M, Boer F (2008) Patient’s satisfaction with perioperative care: development, validation, and application of a questionnaire. Br J Anaesth 100(5):637–644CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eisenberg D, Hwa K, Wren SM (2015) Telephone follow-up by midlevel provider after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair instead of face-to-face clinic visit. JSLS 19(1):e2014.00205 Eisenberg D, Hwa K, Wren SM (2015) Telephone follow-up by midlevel provider after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair instead of face-to-face clinic visit. JSLS 19(1):e2014.00205
9.
go back to reference Rosbe KW, Jones D, Jalisi S et al (2000) Efficacy of postoperative follow-up telephone calls for patients who underwent adenotonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(6):718–721CrossRef Rosbe KW, Jones D, Jalisi S et al (2000) Efficacy of postoperative follow-up telephone calls for patients who underwent adenotonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(6):718–721CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vance S, Fontecilla N, Samie FH et al (2019) Effect of postoperative telephone calls on patient satisfaction and scar satisfaction after Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg 45(12):1459–1464CrossRef Vance S, Fontecilla N, Samie FH et al (2019) Effect of postoperative telephone calls on patient satisfaction and scar satisfaction after Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg 45(12):1459–1464CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Flanagan J (2009) Postoperative telephone calls: timing is everything. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 20(2):89–95CrossRef Flanagan J (2009) Postoperative telephone calls: timing is everything. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 20(2):89–95CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Weinick RM, Burns RM, Mehrotra A (2010) Many emergency department visits could be managed at urgent care centers and retail clinics. Health Aff (Millwood) 29(9):1630–1636CrossRef Weinick RM, Burns RM, Mehrotra A (2010) Many emergency department visits could be managed at urgent care centers and retail clinics. Health Aff (Millwood) 29(9):1630–1636CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Morgan SR, Chang AM, Alqatari M, Pines JM (2013) Non-emergency department interventions to reduce ED utilization: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 20(10): 969–985 Morgan SR, Chang AM, Alqatari M, Pines JM (2013) Non-emergency department interventions to reduce ED utilization: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 20(10): 969–985
14.
go back to reference Naoum NK, Chua ME, Ming JM, Santos JD, Saunders MA, Lopes RI et al (2019) Return to emergency department after pediatric urology procedures. J Pediatr Urol 15(1): 42 e41–42 e46 Naoum NK, Chua ME, Ming JM, Santos JD, Saunders MA, Lopes RI et al (2019) Return to emergency department after pediatric urology procedures. J Pediatr Urol 15(1): 42 e41–42 e46
15.
go back to reference Daley BJ, Cecil W, Clarke PC, Cofer JB, Guillamondequi OD (2015) How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee surgical quality collaborative. J Am Coll Surg 220:550CrossRef Daley BJ, Cecil W, Clarke PC, Cofer JB, Guillamondequi OD (2015) How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee surgical quality collaborative. J Am Coll Surg 220:550CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Do post-operative phone calls enhance family satisfaction and outcomes after outpatient pediatric urological surgeries? A prospective study
Authors
Jin K. Kim
Min Joon Lee
Michael E. Chua
Jessica M. Ming
Armando J. Lorenzo
Walid A. Farhat
Darius J. Bagli
Frank Papanikolaou
Martin A. Koyle
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04770-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Pediatric Surgery International 1/2021 Go to the issue