Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 9/2005

01-09-2005 | Original Article

Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography

Authors: Natalie A. Swoboda, Derek G. Armstrong, John Smith, Ellen Charkot, Bairbre L. Connolly

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 9/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Neuroangiographic techniques (diagnostic and interventional) can be lengthy and complex and can be associated with high radiation entrance skin doses from fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Objective: To measure entrance surface doses received by pediatric patients undergoing neuroangiographic procedures and to (1) compare these doses with thresholds for deterministic effects, (2) compare these doses with those reported in adults, and (3) to understand the dose relationships among diagnostic and interventional procedures, DSA and fluoroscopy. Materials and methods: A neurobiplane unit with fluoroscopic and DSA capabilities was used for all neuroangiographic procedures. An automated patient dosimeter, installed on both planes of the unit, calculated maximum surface dose. The dosimeter also recorded the number of angiographic frames and the length of fluoroscopy time for each procedure. Results: This retrospective study analyzed entrance surface doses to 100 pediatric patients, 76 of whom underwent neuroangiographic diagnostic procedures and 24 of whom underwent neuroangiographic interventional procedures. The DSA acquisitions ranged from 44 frames to 1,428 frames per procedure and fluoroscopy times ranged from 1.1 to 85.6 min per procedure. The mean surface dose from fluoroscopy was 68.1 mGy (max: 397.1 mGy) in the frontal (PA) plane; in the lateral (LAT) plane, the mean surface dose was 40.9 mGy (max: 418.5 mGy). The mean surface doses from DSA were 263.1 and 126.9 mGy in the frontal and lateral planes, with maximum doses of 924.4 and 410.1 mGy, respectively. Mean fluoroscopy dose rates were 5.4 mGy/min in the PA plane and 4.7 mGy/min in the LAT plane. The DSA largely contributed to the overall procedural surface dose, accounting for 82% of the combined surface dose in the each of the imaging planes. Conclusion: The surface dose for each procedure measured in this study was found to be below thresholds for deterministic effects. Interventional procedures consistently yield the highest doses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, publication 60. Permagon Press, Oxford International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, publication 60. Permagon Press, Oxford
2.
go back to reference Huda W, Peters KR (1994) Radiation-induced temporary epilation after a neuroradiologically guided embolization procedure. Radiology 193:642–644 Huda W, Peters KR (1994) Radiation-induced temporary epilation after a neuroradiologically guided embolization procedure. Radiology 193:642–644
3.
go back to reference Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, et al (2003) Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study. II. Skin dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:977–990PubMed Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, et al (2003) Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study. II. Skin dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:977–990PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mooney RB, McKinstry CS, Kamel HAM (2000) Absorbed dose and deterministic effects to patients from interventional neuroradiology. Br J Radiol 73:745–751PubMed Mooney RB, McKinstry CS, Kamel HAM (2000) Absorbed dose and deterministic effects to patients from interventional neuroradiology. Br J Radiol 73:745–751PubMed
5.
go back to reference Norbash A, Busick D, Marks M (1996) Techniques for reducing interventional neuroradiological skin dose; tube position and supplemental beam filtration. AJNR 17:41–49PubMed Norbash A, Busick D, Marks M (1996) Techniques for reducing interventional neuroradiological skin dose; tube position and supplemental beam filtration. AJNR 17:41–49PubMed
6.
go back to reference Theodorakou K, Horrocks JA (2003) A study on radiation doses and irradiated areas in cerebral embolisation. Br J Radiol 76:546–552CrossRefPubMed Theodorakou K, Horrocks JA (2003) A study on radiation doses and irradiated areas in cerebral embolisation. Br J Radiol 76:546–552CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1995) Clarification: recording information in the medical patient’s record that identifies the potential for serious X-ray induced skin injuries. Center for Devices and Radiological Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1995) Clarification: recording information in the medical patient’s record that identifies the potential for serious X-ray induced skin injuries. Center for Devices and Radiological Health
8.
go back to reference Hansson B, Finnbogason T, Schuwert P, et al (1997) Added copper filtration in digital paediatric double-contrast colon examinations: effects on radiation dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 7:1117–1122CrossRefPubMed Hansson B, Finnbogason T, Schuwert P, et al (1997) Added copper filtration in digital paediatric double-contrast colon examinations: effects on radiation dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 7:1117–1122CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Huda W (2004) Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography. Pediatr Radiol [Suppl] 34:S173–S182CrossRefPubMed Huda W (2004) Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography. Pediatr Radiol [Suppl] 34:S173–S182CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Morrell RE, Rogers AT, Jobling JC, et al (2004) Barium enema: use of increased copper filtration to optimize dose and image quality. Br J Radiol 77:116–122CrossRefPubMed Morrell RE, Rogers AT, Jobling JC, et al (2004) Barium enema: use of increased copper filtration to optimize dose and image quality. Br J Radiol 77:116–122CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Nicholson R, Tuffee F, Uthappa MC (2000) Skin sparing in interventional radiology: the effect of copper filtration. Br J Radiol 73:36–42PubMed Nicholson R, Tuffee F, Uthappa MC (2000) Skin sparing in interventional radiology: the effect of copper filtration. Br J Radiol 73:36–42PubMed
12.
go back to reference Miller DL, Balter S, Wagner LK, et al (2004) Quality improvement guidelines for recording patient radiation dose in the medical record. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:423–429PubMed Miller DL, Balter S, Wagner LK, et al (2004) Quality improvement guidelines for recording patient radiation dose in the medical record. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:423–429PubMed
13.
go back to reference Cusma JT, Bell MR, Wondrow MA, et al (1999) Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:427–435CrossRefPubMed Cusma JT, Bell MR, Wondrow MA, et al (1999) Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:427–435CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference O’Dea TJ, Geise RA, Ritenour ER (1999) The potential for radiation-induced skin damage in interventional neuroradiological procedures: a review of 522 cases using automated dosimetry. Med Phys 26:2027–2033CrossRefPubMed O’Dea TJ, Geise RA, Ritenour ER (1999) The potential for radiation-induced skin damage in interventional neuroradiological procedures: a review of 522 cases using automated dosimetry. Med Phys 26:2027–2033CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Johns HE, Cunningham JR (1983) The physics of radiology, 4th edn. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 286–287, 739 Johns HE, Cunningham JR (1983) The physics of radiology, 4th edn. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 286–287, 739
16.
go back to reference Gkanatsios NA, Huda W, Peters KR (2002) Adult patient doses in interventional neuroradiology. Med Phys 29:717–723CrossRefPubMed Gkanatsios NA, Huda W, Peters KR (2002) Adult patient doses in interventional neuroradiology. Med Phys 29:717–723CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kemerink GJ, Frantzen MJ, Oei K, et al (2002) Patient and occupational dose in neurointerventional procedures. Neuroradiology 44:522–528CrossRefPubMed Kemerink GJ, Frantzen MJ, Oei K, et al (2002) Patient and occupational dose in neurointerventional procedures. Neuroradiology 44:522–528CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Koenig TR, Wolff D, Mettler FA, et al (2001) Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures. 1. Characteristics of radiation injury. AJR 177:13–20PubMed Koenig TR, Wolff D, Mettler FA, et al (2001) Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures. 1. Characteristics of radiation injury. AJR 177:13–20PubMed
19.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT . AJR 176:289–296PubMed Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT . AJR 176:289–296PubMed
20.
go back to reference Hall EJ (2000) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 5th edn. Lipincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Hall EJ (2000) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 5th edn. Lipincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
21.
go back to reference Lewall DB, Riley P, Hassoon AA, et al (1995) A fluoroscopy credentialling programme for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:442–444PubMed Lewall DB, Riley P, Hassoon AA, et al (1995) A fluoroscopy credentialling programme for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:442–444PubMed
Metadata
Title
Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography
Authors
Natalie A. Swoboda
Derek G. Armstrong
John Smith
Ellen Charkot
Bairbre L. Connolly
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 9/2005
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-1496-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2005

Pediatric Radiology 9/2005 Go to the issue