Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Melanomas

Patterns and Timing of Initial Relapse in Pathologic Stage II Melanoma Patients

Authors: Ann Y. Lee, MD, Nicolas Droppelmann, MD, Katherine S. Panageas, DrPH, Qin Zhou, MA, Charlotte E. Ariyan, MD, Mary S. Brady, MD, Paul B. Chapman, MD, Daniel G. Coit, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Pathologic stage II melanoma patients have variable outcomes when divided by substage. We hypothesized that an understanding of the patterns of initial relapse by substage will better inform follow-up guidelines.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 738 adult patients with pathologic stage II cutaneous melanoma treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1993 and 2013. Clinical records were reviewed to determine time, location, and method of detection of initial relapse.

Results

At a median follow-up of 52 months, 219 patients relapsed. Relapses were detected more frequently in higher substages. Initial relapses were most commonly local/in-transit for IIA and IIB and systemic for IIC. Lung and brain were the most frequent sites of systemic relapse. Patient-detection was the most common method of relapse detection (59%) in all substages. The 5-year cumulative incidence for patient-detected relapse was 13.6% for IIA, 18.9% for IIB, and 23.3% for IIC and for image-detected relapse was 3.4, 7.9, and 16.6%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence for physician-detected relapse was less than 10% across all substages and leveled off at 3 years for stage IIA and IIB and 2 years for stage IIC.

Conclusions

Relapses were most frequently patient-detected in all stage II substages, highlighting the importance of patient education and self-examination. The highest yield for routine imaging is in stage IIC patients during the first 4 years. Physician examination is unlikely to detect relapses beyond 3 years for stage IIA and IIB and beyond 2 years for stage IIC patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Romano E, Scordo M, Dusza SW, Coit DG, Chapman PB. Site and timing of first relapse in stage III melanoma patients: implications for follow-up guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):3042–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Romano E, Scordo M, Dusza SW, Coit DG, Chapman PB. Site and timing of first relapse in stage III melanoma patients: implications for follow-up guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):3042–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Xing Y, Cromwell KD, Cormier JN. Review of diagnostic imaging modalities for the surveillance of melanoma patients. Dermatol Res Pract. 2012;2012:941921.PubMed Xing Y, Cromwell KD, Cormier JN. Review of diagnostic imaging modalities for the surveillance of melanoma patients. Dermatol Res Pract. 2012;2012:941921.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Garbe C, Paul A, Kohler-Spath H, et al. Prospective evaluation of a follow-up schedule in cutaneous melanoma patients: recommendations for an effective follow-up strategy. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(3):520–9.CrossRefPubMed Garbe C, Paul A, Kohler-Spath H, et al. Prospective evaluation of a follow-up schedule in cutaneous melanoma patients: recommendations for an effective follow-up strategy. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(3):520–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Livingstone E, Eigentler TK, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, et al. Actual practice of melanoma follow-up and treatment in Germany: results of a prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(6):1646-50.CrossRefPubMed Livingstone E, Eigentler TK, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, et al. Actual practice of melanoma follow-up and treatment in Germany: results of a prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(6):1646-50.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Damude S, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Francken AB, Ter Meulen S, Bastiaannet E, Hoekstra HJ. The MELFO Study: prospective, randomized, clinical trial for the evaluation of a stage-adjusted reduced follow-up schedule in cutaneous melanoma patients-results after 1 year. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(9):2762–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Damude S, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Francken AB, Ter Meulen S, Bastiaannet E, Hoekstra HJ. The MELFO Study: prospective, randomized, clinical trial for the evaluation of a stage-adjusted reduced follow-up schedule in cutaneous melanoma patients-results after 1 year. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(9):2762–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
9.
go back to reference Moore Dalal K, Zhou Q, Panageas KS, Brady MS, Jaques DP, Coit DG. Methods of detection of first recurrence in patients with stage I/II primary cutaneous melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(8):2206–14.CrossRefPubMed Moore Dalal K, Zhou Q, Panageas KS, Brady MS, Jaques DP, Coit DG. Methods of detection of first recurrence in patients with stage I/II primary cutaneous melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(8):2206–14.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Francken AB, Shaw HM, Accortt NA, Soong SJ, Hoekstra HJ, Thompson JF. Detection of first relapse in cutaneous melanoma patients: implications for the formulation of evidence-based follow-up guidelines. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(6):1924–33.CrossRefPubMed Francken AB, Shaw HM, Accortt NA, Soong SJ, Hoekstra HJ, Thompson JF. Detection of first relapse in cutaneous melanoma patients: implications for the formulation of evidence-based follow-up guidelines. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(6):1924–33.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Meyers MO, Yeh JJ, Frank J, et al. Method of detection of initial recurrence of stage II/III cutaneous melanoma: analysis of the utility of follow-up staging. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(4):941–7.CrossRefPubMed Meyers MO, Yeh JJ, Frank J, et al. Method of detection of initial recurrence of stage II/III cutaneous melanoma: analysis of the utility of follow-up staging. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(4):941–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Regan MW, Reid CD, Griffiths RW, Briggs JC. Malignant melanoma, evaluation of clinical follow up by questionnaire survey. Br J Plastic Surg. 1985;38(1):11–4.CrossRef Regan MW, Reid CD, Griffiths RW, Briggs JC. Malignant melanoma, evaluation of clinical follow up by questionnaire survey. Br J Plastic Surg. 1985;38(1):11–4.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hofmann U, Szedlak M, Rittgen W, Jung EG, Schadendorf D. Primary staging and follow-up in melanoma patients–monocenter evaluation of methods, costs and patient survival. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(2):151–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hofmann U, Szedlak M, Rittgen W, Jung EG, Schadendorf D. Primary staging and follow-up in melanoma patients–monocenter evaluation of methods, costs and patient survival. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(2):151–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Bradford PT, Freedman DM, Goldstein AM, Tucker MA. Increased risk of second primary cancers after a diagnosis of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(3):265–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bradford PT, Freedman DM, Goldstein AM, Tucker MA. Increased risk of second primary cancers after a diagnosis of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(3):265–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Caini S, Boniol M, Botteri E, et al. The risk of developing a second primary cancer in melanoma patients: a comprehensive review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Dermatol Sci. 2014;75(1):3–9.CrossRefPubMed Caini S, Boniol M, Botteri E, et al. The risk of developing a second primary cancer in melanoma patients: a comprehensive review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Dermatol Sci. 2014;75(1):3–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Austin PF, Cruse CW, Lyman G, Schroer K, Glass F, Reintgen DS. Age as a prognostic factor in the malignant melanoma population. Ann Surg Oncol. 1994;1(6):487–94.CrossRefPubMed Austin PF, Cruse CW, Lyman G, Schroer K, Glass F, Reintgen DS. Age as a prognostic factor in the malignant melanoma population. Ann Surg Oncol. 1994;1(6):487–94.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Schuchter L, Schultz DJ, Synnestvedt M, et al. A prognostic model for predicting 10-year survival in patients with primary melanoma. The Pigmented Lesion Group. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(5):369–75.CrossRefPubMed Schuchter L, Schultz DJ, Synnestvedt M, et al. A prognostic model for predicting 10-year survival in patients with primary melanoma. The Pigmented Lesion Group. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(5):369–75.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(16):3622–34.CrossRefPubMed Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(16):3622–34.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Masback A, Olsson H, Westerdahl J, Ingvar C, Jonsson N. Prognostic factors in invasive cutaneous malignant melanoma: a population-based study and review. Melanoma Res. 2001;11(5):435–45.CrossRefPubMed Masback A, Olsson H, Westerdahl J, Ingvar C, Jonsson N. Prognostic factors in invasive cutaneous malignant melanoma: a population-based study and review. Melanoma Res. 2001;11(5):435–45.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rueth NM, Xing Y, Chiang YJ, et al. Is surveillance imaging effective for detecting surgically treatable recurrences in patients with melanoma? A comparative analysis of stage-specific surveillance strategies. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1215–22.CrossRefPubMed Rueth NM, Xing Y, Chiang YJ, et al. Is surveillance imaging effective for detecting surgically treatable recurrences in patients with melanoma? A comparative analysis of stage-specific surveillance strategies. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1215–22.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hengge UR, Wallerand A, Stutzki A, Kockel N. Cost-effectiveness of reduced follow-up in malignant melanoma. J German Soc Dermatol. 2007;5(10):898–907. Hengge UR, Wallerand A, Stutzki A, Kockel N. Cost-effectiveness of reduced follow-up in malignant melanoma. J German Soc Dermatol. 2007;5(10):898–907.
22.
go back to reference Dicker TJ, Kavanagh GM, Herd RM, et al. A rational approach to melanoma follow-up in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Scottish Melanoma Group. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140(2):249–54.CrossRefPubMed Dicker TJ, Kavanagh GM, Herd RM, et al. A rational approach to melanoma follow-up in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Scottish Melanoma Group. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140(2):249–54.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Nguyen T, Kuo C, Nicholl MB, et al. Downregulation of microRNA-29c is associated with hypermethylation of tumor-related genes and disease outcome in cutaneous melanoma. Epigenetics. 2011;6(3):388–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nguyen T, Kuo C, Nicholl MB, et al. Downregulation of microRNA-29c is associated with hypermethylation of tumor-related genes and disease outcome in cutaneous melanoma. Epigenetics. 2011;6(3):388–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
25.
go back to reference Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):23–34.CrossRefPubMed Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):23–34.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2006–17.CrossRefPubMed Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2006–17.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2507–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2507–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
29.
Metadata
Title
Patterns and Timing of Initial Relapse in Pathologic Stage II Melanoma Patients
Authors
Ann Y. Lee, MD
Nicolas Droppelmann, MD
Katherine S. Panageas, DrPH
Qin Zhou, MA
Charlotte E. Ariyan, MD
Mary S. Brady, MD
Paul B. Chapman, MD
Daniel G. Coit, MD
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5642-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2017 Go to the issue