Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Patients with Recurrent Colorectal Liver Metastases: Impact on Restaging and Treatment Planning

Authors: Luca Viganò, MD, PhD, Egesta Lopci, MD, Guido Costa, MD, Marcello Rodari, MD, Dario Poretti, MD, Vittorio Pedicini, MD, Luigi Solbiati, MD, Arturo Chiti, MD, Guido Torzilli, MD, PhD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The impact of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) still is debated. Its relevance could be enhanced in the case of recurrent disease. The current study aimed to elucidate the role of PET-CT in restaging and treatment planning for recurrent CLM.

Methods

A series of 352 consecutive patients undergoing their first liver resection for CLM between 2005 and 2014 was reviewed. Of these patients, 224 (63.6 %) had a recurrence. The 107 patients who had received PET-CT at diagnosis of recurrence before chemotherapy were analyzed. CT was available in all cases, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was available in 64 cases.

Results

Extrahepatic lesions were found in 59 patients. Liver and lung recurrences were detected with excellent sensitivity by CT/MRI and PET-CT (liver: 100 vs. 96.7 %; lung: 95.8 vs. 95.8 %). In detecting other recurrence sites, PET-CT had higher sensitivity than CT/MRI (91.5 vs. 54.2 %, p < 0.01; lymph nodes: 93.5 vs. 64.5 %, p = 0.011; peritoneum: 80 vs. 20 %, p = 0.023; bones: 87.5 vs. 37.5 %, nonsignificant difference). For 28.8 % (17/59) of the patients, the diagnosis of extrahepatic disease was obtained thanks to PET-CT (39.5 % considering nonpulmonary lesions). PET-CT modified treatment strategy in 16 (14.9 %) patients, excluding from surgery 15 (20.3 %) of 74 patients resectable at CT/MRI. This latter subgroup had a lower survival rate than the patients resectable after PET-CT (2-year survival, 22.7 vs. 77.8 %; p = 0.004), similar to the patients unresectable at CT/MRI (57.6 %).

Conclusions

In the authors’ experience, PET-CT has offered a relevant contribution to restaging of recurrent CLM. It disclosed one fourth of extrahepatic lesions and prevented worthless surgery for about 20 % of patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adam R, De Gramont A, Figueras J, et al. The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus. Oncologist. 2012;17:1225–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adam R, De Gramont A, Figueras J, et al. The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus. Oncologist. 2012;17:1225–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Vauthey JN, Choti MA, Helton WS. AHPBA/SSO/SSAT Consensus Conference on hepatic colorectal metastases: rationale and overview of the conference. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1259–60.CrossRefPubMed Vauthey JN, Choti MA, Helton WS. AHPBA/SSO/SSAT Consensus Conference on hepatic colorectal metastases: rationale and overview of the conference. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1259–60.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ, Salloum C, et al. Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal metastases. Br J Surg. 2013;100:808–18.CrossRefPubMed Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ, Salloum C, et al. Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal metastases. Br J Surg. 2013;100:808–18.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Imamura H, Kawasaki S, Miyagawa S, Ikegami T, Kitamura H, Shimada R. Aggressive surgical approach to recurrent tumors after hepatectomy for metastatic spread of colorectal cancer to the liver. Surgery. 2000;127:528–35.CrossRefPubMed Imamura H, Kawasaki S, Miyagawa S, Ikegami T, Kitamura H, Shimada R. Aggressive surgical approach to recurrent tumors after hepatectomy for metastatic spread of colorectal cancer to the liver. Surgery. 2000;127:528–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Viganò L, Capussotti L, Lapointe R, et al. Early recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases: risk factors, prognosis, and treatment. a LiverMetSurvey-based study of 6025 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1276–86.CrossRefPubMed Viganò L, Capussotti L, Lapointe R, et al. Early recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases: risk factors, prognosis, and treatment. a LiverMetSurvey-based study of 6025 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1276–86.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Margonis GA, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Karagkounis G, Choti MA, Pawlik TM. Effect of KRAS mutation on long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4158–65.CrossRefPubMed Margonis GA, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Karagkounis G, Choti MA, Pawlik TM. Effect of KRAS mutation on long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4158–65.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, Kopetz SE, et al. RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2013;258:619–26.CrossRefPubMed Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, Kopetz SE, et al. RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2013;258:619–26.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Carpizo DR, D’Angelica M. Liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer in the presence of extrahepatic disease. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:801–9.CrossRefPubMed Carpizo DR, D’Angelica M. Liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer in the presence of extrahepatic disease. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:801–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Elias D, Ouellet JF, Bellon N, Pignon JP, Pocard M, Lasser P. Extrahepatic disease does not contraindicate hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2003;90:567–74.CrossRefPubMed Elias D, Ouellet JF, Bellon N, Pignon JP, Pocard M, Lasser P. Extrahepatic disease does not contraindicate hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2003;90:567–74.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Viganò L, Russolillo N, Ferrero A, Langella S, Sperti E, Capussotti L. Evolution of long-term outcome of liver resection for colorectal metastases: analysis of actual 5-year survival rates over two decades. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2035–44.CrossRefPubMed Viganò L, Russolillo N, Ferrero A, Langella S, Sperti E, Capussotti L. Evolution of long-term outcome of liver resection for colorectal metastases: analysis of actual 5-year survival rates over two decades. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2035–44.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kekelidze M, D’Errico L, Pansini M, Tyndall A, Hohmann J. Colorectal cancer: current imaging methods and future perspectives for the diagnosis, staging and therapeutic response evaluation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8502–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kekelidze M, D’Errico L, Pansini M, Tyndall A, Hohmann J. Colorectal cancer: current imaging methods and future perspectives for the diagnosis, staging and therapeutic response evaluation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8502–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Moulton CA, Gu CS, Law CH, et al. Effect of PET before liver resection on surgical management for colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1863–9.CrossRefPubMed Moulton CA, Gu CS, Law CH, et al. Effect of PET before liver resection on surgical management for colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1863–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ruers TJ, Wiering B, van der Sijp JR, et al. Improved selection of patients for hepatic surgery of colorectal liver metastases with (18)F-FDG PET: a randomized study. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1036–41.CrossRefPubMed Ruers TJ, Wiering B, van der Sijp JR, et al. Improved selection of patients for hepatic surgery of colorectal liver metastases with (18)F-FDG PET: a randomized study. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1036–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Maffione AM, Lopci E, Bluemel C, Giammarile F, Herrmann K, Rubello D. Diagnostic accuracy and impact on management of (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:152–63.CrossRefPubMed Maffione AM, Lopci E, Bluemel C, Giammarile F, Herrmann K, Rubello D. Diagnostic accuracy and impact on management of (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:152–63.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.CrossRefPubMed Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lopci E, Torzilli G, Poretti D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 11C-choline PET/CT in comparison with CT and/or MRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1399–407.CrossRefPubMed Lopci E, Torzilli G, Poretti D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 11C-choline PET/CT in comparison with CT and/or MRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1399–407.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yip VS, Poston GJ, Fenwick SW, Wieshmann H, Athwal T, Malik HZ. FDG-PET-CT is effective in selecting patients with poor long-term survivals for colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:995–9.CrossRefPubMed Yip VS, Poston GJ, Fenwick SW, Wieshmann H, Athwal T, Malik HZ. FDG-PET-CT is effective in selecting patients with poor long-term survivals for colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:995–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–422.CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–422.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Poston GJ, Tait D, O’Connell S, et al. Diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011;343:d6751.CrossRefPubMed Poston GJ, Tait D, O’Connell S, et al. Diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011;343:d6751.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Serrano PE, Gafni A, Gu CS et al. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) versus no PET-CT in the management of potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: cost implications of a randomized controlled trial. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12:e765–74.CrossRefPubMed Serrano PE, Gafni A, Gu CS et al. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) versus no PET-CT in the management of potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: cost implications of a randomized controlled trial. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12:e765–74.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference de Jong MC, Pulitano C, Ribero D, et al. Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: an international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:440–8.PubMed de Jong MC, Pulitano C, Ribero D, et al. Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: an international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:440–8.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Torzilli G, Procopio F, Botea F, et al. One-stage ultrasonographically guided hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases: a feasible and effective alternative to the 2-stage approach. Surgery. 2009;146:60–71.CrossRefPubMed Torzilli G, Procopio F, Botea F, et al. One-stage ultrasonographically guided hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases: a feasible and effective alternative to the 2-stage approach. Surgery. 2009;146:60–71.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Viganò L, Procopio F, Cimino M, et al. Is tumor detachment from vascular structures equivalent to R0 resection in surgery for colorectal liver metastases? An observational cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1352–60.CrossRefPubMed Viganò L, Procopio F, Cimino M, et al. Is tumor detachment from vascular structures equivalent to R0 resection in surgery for colorectal liver metastases? An observational cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1352–60.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Torzilli G. Ultrasound-Guided Liver Surgery: An Atlas. 1st ed. Springer-Verlag, Milan, 2014.CrossRef Torzilli G. Ultrasound-Guided Liver Surgery: An Atlas. 1st ed. Springer-Verlag, Milan, 2014.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D, Castaing D, Bismuth H. Two-stage hepatectomy: a planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors. Ann Surg. 2000;232:777–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D, Castaing D, Bismuth H. Two-stage hepatectomy: a planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors. Ann Surg. 2000;232:777–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Wiering B, Krabbe PF, Jager GJ, Oyen WJ, Ruers TJ. The impact of fluor-18-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in the management of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2005;104:2658–70.CrossRefPubMed Wiering B, Krabbe PF, Jager GJ, Oyen WJ, Ruers TJ. The impact of fluor-18-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in the management of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2005;104:2658–70.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Metser U, You J, McSweeney S, Freeman M, Hendler A. Assessment of tumor recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level: FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT of the chest and abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:766–71.CrossRefPubMed Metser U, You J, McSweeney S, Freeman M, Hendler A. Assessment of tumor recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level: FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT of the chest and abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:766–71.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Zhang C, Chen Y, Xue H, et al. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:167–73.CrossRefPubMed Zhang C, Chen Y, Xue H, et al. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:167–73.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Adam R, de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, et al. Is hepatic resection justified after chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases and lymph node involvement? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3672–80.CrossRefPubMed Adam R, de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, et al. Is hepatic resection justified after chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases and lymph node involvement? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3672–80.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Viganò L, Russolillo N, Ferrero A, et al. Resection of liver metastases from colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is this a different disease? Results of a case-control study. Ann Surg. 2014;260:878–84.CrossRefPubMed Viganò L, Russolillo N, Ferrero A, et al. Resection of liver metastases from colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is this a different disease? Results of a case-control study. Ann Surg. 2014;260:878–84.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Koh JL, Yan TD, Glenn D, Morris DL. Evaluation of preoperative computed tomography in estimating peritoneal cancer index in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:327–33.CrossRefPubMed Koh JL, Yan TD, Glenn D, Morris DL. Evaluation of preoperative computed tomography in estimating peritoneal cancer index in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:327–33.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Esquivel J, Chua TC, Stojadinovic A, et al. Accuracy and clinical relevance of computed tomography scan interpretation of peritoneal cancer index in colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: a multi-institutional study. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:565–70.CrossRefPubMed Esquivel J, Chua TC, Stojadinovic A, et al. Accuracy and clinical relevance of computed tomography scan interpretation of peritoneal cancer index in colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: a multi-institutional study. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:565–70.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Briggs RH, Chowdhury FU, Lodge JPA, Scarbrook AF. Clinical impact of FDG PET-CT in patients with potentially operable metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:1167–74.CrossRefPubMed Briggs RH, Chowdhury FU, Lodge JPA, Scarbrook AF. Clinical impact of FDG PET-CT in patients with potentially operable metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:1167–74.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference van Kessel CS, Buckens CF, van den Bosch MA, et al. Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2805–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Kessel CS, Buckens CF, van den Bosch MA, et al. Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2805–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Wiering B, Adang EM, van der Sijp JR, et al. Added value of positron emission tomography imaging in the surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Nucl Med Comm. 2010;31:938–44.CrossRef Wiering B, Adang EM, van der Sijp JR, et al. Added value of positron emission tomography imaging in the surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Nucl Med Comm. 2010;31:938–44.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Patients with Recurrent Colorectal Liver Metastases: Impact on Restaging and Treatment Planning
Authors
Luca Viganò, MD, PhD
Egesta Lopci, MD
Guido Costa, MD
Marcello Rodari, MD
Dario Poretti, MD
Vittorio Pedicini, MD
Luigi Solbiati, MD
Arturo Chiti, MD
Guido Torzilli, MD, PhD, FACS
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5644-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2017 Go to the issue