Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 4/2017

01-07-2017 | Letter

Patient satisfaction and safety profile with sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy

Authors: Nimesh K. Tarway, Mayank Jain, V. P. Rajavel, Srinivas Melpakkam, Vijaya Srinivasan, R. Ravi, Joy Varghese, Tom Michael, Jayanthi Venkataraman

Published in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor:
Table 1
Sedation preference and patient comfort
Parameters
Score
Gp I
With sedation
Gp II
No sedation
p-value(s)
Chi-Sq/MW*
   
(121)
(383)
 
Patient comfort
No discomfort
80 (66.0)
25 (6.5)
< 0.0001
during
Minimal
37 (30.5)
121 (31.6)
 
endoscopy
Mild
3 (2.5)
161 (42.0)
 
 
Moderate to severe
1 (0.8)
76 (31.8)
 
Painafter 30 mins
on Likert Scale 0 to 10
0
108 (89.3)
363 (94.8)
<0.42
1
8 (6.6)
16 (4.2)
 
2
5 (4.1)
4 (1.0)
 
3–10
None
None
 
Patient
Expectation
Better
75 (62)
63 (16.4)
 
than expected
   
<0.000 1
As expected
46 (38.0)
247 (71.5)
 
Worse
than expected
None
73 (19)
 
Comparison
Better
15 (71.4)
13 (18.1)
 
with previous
Same
6 (28.6)
50 (69.4)
 
Endoscopy
experience
Worse
0
9 (12.5)
<0.0001
Literature
3.
go back to reference Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:967–74.CrossRefPubMed Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:967–74.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Riphaus A, Rabofski M, Wehrmann T. Endoscopic sedation and monitoring practice in Germany: results from the first nationwide survey. Z Gastroenterol. 2010;48:392–7.CrossRefPubMed Riphaus A, Rabofski M, Wehrmann T. Endoscopic sedation and monitoring practice in Germany: results from the first nationwide survey. Z Gastroenterol. 2010;48:392–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Thornley P, Beshir MA, Gregor J, et al. Efficiency and patient experience with propofol vs conventional sedation: a prospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;8:232–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thornley P, Beshir MA, Gregor J, et al. Efficiency and patient experience with propofol vs conventional sedation: a prospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;8:232–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Patient satisfaction and safety profile with sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy
Authors
Nimesh K. Tarway
Mayank Jain
V. P. Rajavel
Srinivas Melpakkam
Vijaya Srinivasan
R. Ravi
Joy Varghese
Tom Michael
Jayanthi Venkataraman
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0254-8860
Electronic ISSN: 0975-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-017-0778-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 4/2017 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.