Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Oral Health
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Patient-reported negative experiences related to caries and its treatment among Swedish adult patients

Authors: Håkan Flink, Åke Tegelberg, Judith E. Arnetz, Dowen Birkhed

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It has been suggested that dental caries should be regarded as a chronic disease as many individuals repeatedly develop new caries lesions. How this is perceived by caries active patients is unclear. The aim of this study was to measure patient-reported attitudes and negative experiences related to caries and dental treatment.

Methods

A questionnaire was mailed to 134 caries active (CA) and 40 caries inactive (CI) adult patients treated at a Swedish public dental service clinic. The questionnaire included items regarding patient-reported oral health; attitudes towards caries and efforts to prevent them; and negative experiences related to caries and dental treatment. Questionnaire data were supplemented with data on caries and caries prophylaxis from patients’ dental records. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on items related to patients’ perceptions of problems to see whether scales could be created. Experiences, perceptions and dental records of CA and CI patients were compared.

Results

The overall response rate was 69%. Dental records confirmed that CA patients had significantly more decayed teeth per year and a longer period of caries-active time than CI patients. Factor analysis resulted in 3 distinct scales measuring problems related to caries; 1) caries-related information; 2) negative experiences; and 3) negative treatment/staff attitudes. A fourth scale measuring perceived problems related to caries was also created. The CA group reported significantly more problems related to caries and dental treatment, received significantly more caries-related information, and reported significantly more negative treatment experiences compared to CI patients.

Conclusions

Caries prophylaxis methods need to be improved in order to better meet the needs of caries active patients and to create a more positive experience with dental care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
WHO. WHO Report: Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;916:i-viii. 1-149.
3.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement. Diagnosis and management of dental caries throughout life, March 26-28, 2001. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132(8):1153–61.CrossRef
4.
To Prevent Caries: A Systematic Review. In.: The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU) (In Swedish); 2002.
5.
Zero D, Fontana M, Lennon AM. Clinical applications and outcomes of using indicators of risk in caries management. J Dent Educ. 2001;65(10):1126–32.PubMed
6.
Källestål C. The effect of five years' implementation of caries-preventive methods in Swedish high-risk adolescents. Caries Res. 2005;39(1):20–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Källestål C, Holm AK. Allocation of dental caries prevention in Swedish teenagers. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994;22(2):100–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Varsio S, Vehkalahti M. Dentists' decisions on caries risk and preventive treatment by dental state among 15-year-old adolescents. Commun Dent Health. 1997;14(3):166–70.
9.
Hattne K, Folke S, Twetman S. Attitudes to oral health among adolescents with high caries risk. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2007;65(4):206–13.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Unell L, Söderfeldt B, Halling A, Birkhed D. Explanatory models for clinically determined and symptom-reported caries indicators in an adult population. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1999;57(3):132–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Broadbent JM, Thomson WM, Poulton R. Trajectory patterns of dental caries experience in the permanent dentition to the fourth decade of life. J Dent Res. 2008;87(1):69–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Söderström U, Johansson I, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K. A retrospective analysis of caries treatment and development in relation to assessed caries risk in an adult population in Sweden. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Flink H, Tegelberg Å, Arnetz J, Birkhed D. Correlation between perceived experience of caries disease and recorded caries activity among adult patients at a Swedish Public Dental Clinic: A longitudinal study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2013;71(6):1486–92.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Flink H, Tegelberg Å, Sörensen S. Hyposalivation and iron stores among individuals with and without active dental caries. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2000;58(6):265–71.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Flink H, Tegelberg Å, Arnetz J, Birkhed D. Patient-reported outcomes of caries prophylaxis among Swedish caries active adults in a long-term perspective. Swed Dent J. 2016;40(1):101–10.PubMed
16.
Zickert I, Jonson A, Klock B, Krasse B. Disease activity and need for dental care in a capitation plan based on risk assessment. Br Dent J. 2000;189(9):480–6.PubMed
17.
Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(2):102–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics., 4th edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
19.
Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(2):234–43.CrossRefPubMed
20.
MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Preacher KJ, Hong S. Sample Size in Factor Analysis: The Role of Model Error. Multivariate Behav Res. 2001;36(4):611–37.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Guadagnoli E, Velicer WF. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(2):265–75.CrossRefPubMed
22.
MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample Size in Factor Analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(1):84–99.CrossRef
23.
Molarius A, Engström S, Flink H, Simonsson B, Tegelberg Å. Socioeconomic differences in self-rated oral health and dental care utilisation after the dental care reform in 2008 in Sweden. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Maupome G, Peters D, White BA. Use of clinical services compared with patients' perceptions of and satisfaction with oral health status. J Public Health Dent. 2004;64(2):88–95.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Kvale G, Berg E, Nilsen CM, Raadal M, Nielsen GH, Johnsen TB, Wormnes B. Validation of the Dental Fear Scale and the Dental Belief Survey in a Norwegian sample. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25(2):160–4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Aljafari AK, Gallagher JE, & Hosey MT. Failure on all fronts: general dental practitioners’ views on promoting oral health in high caries risk children--a qualitative study. BMC Oral Health, 2015. 15: p. 45.
27.
National Guidelines for Adult Dental Care (Nationella riktlinjer för vuxentandvård): Socialstyrelsen (In Swedish); 2011.
28.
Riley 3rd JL, Gordan VV, Rindal DB, Fellows JL, Ajmo CT, Amundson C, Anderson GA, Gilbert GH, Dental PCG. Preferences for caries prevention agents in adult patients: findings from the dental practice-based research network. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010;38(4):360–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Hänsel Petersson G, Åkerman S, Isberg PE, Ericson D. Comparison of risk assessment based on clinical judgement and Cariogram in addition to patient perceived treatment need. BMC Oral Health. 2016;17(1):13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
31.
Ismail AI, Pitts NB, Tellez M, Authors of International Caries C, Management S, Banerjee A, Deery C, Douglas G, Eggertsson H, Ekstrand K, et al. The International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS) An Example of a Caries Management Pathway. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15 Suppl 1:S9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Sbaraini A. What factors influence the provision of preventive care by general dental practitioners? Br Dent J. 2012;212(11):E18.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Sbaraini A, Carter SM, Evans RW, Blinkhorn A. How do dentists and their teams incorporate evidence about preventive care? An empirical study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(5):401–14.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient-reported negative experiences related to caries and its treatment among Swedish adult patients
Authors
Håkan Flink
Åke Tegelberg
Judith E. Arnetz
Dowen Birkhed
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0384-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Oral Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Profiling intraoral neuropathic disturbances following lingual nerve injury and in burning mouth syndrome

Research article

Resting salivary flow independently associated with oral malodor

Research article

Salivary pellets induce a pro-inflammatory response involving the TLR4–NF-kB pathway in gingival fibroblasts

Research article

School workers’ knowledge, attitude and behaviour related to use of Toombak: a cross sectional study from Khartoum state, Sudan

Research article

The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review

Research article

L-mimosine and hypoxia can increase angiogenin production in dental pulp-derived cells