Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Research

Patient Experiences with Chronic Care Management Services and Fees: a Qualitative Study

Authors: Claire Wilson, PhD, Ann S. O’Malley, MD, MPH, Carla Bozzolo, MPH, Nancy McCall, ScD, Sai Ma, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As of 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) pays for chronic care management (CCM) services for Medicare beneficiaries with two or more chronic conditions. CMS requires eligible providers to first obtain patients’ verbal (and, prior to 2017, written) consent, to ensure that patients who participate in CCM services understand their rights and agree to any applicable cost sharing. CCM providers must also enhance patients’ access to continuous and coordinated care, including ongoing care management.

Objective

To understand patients’ perceptions of the consent process, their reasons for choosing to participate, and their experiences receiving CCM services.

Design

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Medicare beneficiaries who had two or more CCM claims submitted by an eligible provider. Beneficiaries were selected from a sampling frame of Medicare claims submitted between January and September 2015.

Key Results

Most patients reported no concerns about being asked to participate in CCM. The majority of patients had secondary insurance (or Medicaid) that covered any coinsurance for CCM and therefore could not say with certainty whether they would participate if they had to pay for CCM services out-of-pocket. Reasons for participating included having insurance that covered the copay and peace of mind about having access to the CCM team. Patients reported multiple benefits of participating in CCM services, including better access to their primary care team, improved continuity of care, and improved care coordination. Most patients reported no downside to participating in CCM services, although some felt they were relatively healthy and questioned whether they needed CCM services.

Conclusions

These findings on patients’ experiences participating in CCM services during the first 9 months of the policy’s implementation can help providers and policymakers understand their perceived benefits and unintended consequences. Our findings also have implications for providers when approaching patients about CCM services.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gerteis J, Izrael D, Deitz D, et al. Multiple chronic conditions chartbook. AHRQ Publications No. 14-0038. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014. Gerteis J, Izrael D, Deitz D, et al. Multiple chronic conditions chartbook. AHRQ Publications No. 14-0038. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, Chartbook: 2012 edition. Baltimore, MD; 2012. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, Chartbook: 2012 edition. Baltimore, MD; 2012.
3.
go back to reference Sharma MA, Cheng N, Moore M, Coffman M, Bazemore AW. Patients with high-cost chronic conditions rely heavily on primary care physicians. J Am Board Fam Med, 2014; 27(1), 11–12.CrossRefPubMed Sharma MA, Cheng N, Moore M, Coffman M, Bazemore AW. Patients with high-cost chronic conditions rely heavily on primary care physicians. J Am Board Fam Med, 2014; 27(1), 11–12.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Holahan J, Schoen C, McMorrow S. The potential savings from enhanced chronic care management policies. Washington DC: Urban Institute; 2011. Holahan J, Schoen C, McMorrow S. The potential savings from enhanced chronic care management policies. Washington DC: Urban Institute; 2011.
6.
go back to reference Frandsen BR, Joynt KE, Rebitzer JB, Jha AK. (2015). Care fragmentation, quality, and costs among chronically ill patients. Am J Manag Care. 21(5):355–362.PubMed Frandsen BR, Joynt KE, Rebitzer JB, Jha AK. (2015). Care fragmentation, quality, and costs among chronically ill patients. Am J Manag Care. 21(5):355–362.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bleich SN, Sherrod C, Chiang A, et al. Systematic review of programs treating high-need and high-cost people with multiple chronic diseases or disabilities in the United States, 2008–2014. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:150275.CrossRef Bleich SN, Sherrod C, Chiang A, et al. Systematic review of programs treating high-need and high-cost people with multiple chronic diseases or disabilities in the United States, 2008–2014. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:150275.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T, Grundy P. The outcomes of implementing the patient- centered medical home interventions. Washington, DC: Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative; 2009. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T, Grundy P. The outcomes of implementing the patient- centered medical home interventions. Washington, DC: Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative; 2009.
9.
go back to reference McCall N, Cromwell J, Urato C. Evaluation of Medicare care management for high cost beneficiaries (CMHCB) demonstration: Massachusetts General Hospital and Massachusetts General Physicians Organization (MGH). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2010. McCall N, Cromwell J, Urato C. Evaluation of Medicare care management for high cost beneficiaries (CMHCB) demonstration: Massachusetts General Hospital and Massachusetts General Physicians Organization (MGH). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2010.
11.
go back to reference Schurrer J, O’Malley A, Wilson C, McCall N, Jain N. Evaluation of the diffusion and impact of the chronic care management (CCM) services: final report. Washington DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.:2017. Schurrer J, O’Malley A, Wilson C, McCall N, Jain N. Evaluation of the diffusion and impact of the chronic care management (CCM) services: final report. Washington DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.:2017.
12.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd edition. Sage Newcastle upon Tyne; 2014. Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd edition. Sage Newcastle upon Tyne; 2014.
13.
go back to reference Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons; 1998. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons; 1998.
15.
go back to reference O’Malley AS, Sarwar RS, Keith R, Balke P, Ma S, McCall N. Provider experiences with chronic care management (CCM) services and fees: a qualitative research study. J Gen Intern Med. 2017; 32(12):1294–1300.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed O’Malley AS, Sarwar RS, Keith R, Balke P, Ma S, McCall N. Provider experiences with chronic care management (CCM) services and fees: a qualitative research study. J Gen Intern Med. 2017; 32(12):1294–1300.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient Experiences with Chronic Care Management Services and Fees: a Qualitative Study
Authors
Claire Wilson, PhD
Ann S. O’Malley, MD, MPH
Carla Bozzolo, MPH
Nancy McCall, ScD
Sai Ma, PhD
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4750-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.