Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Psychiatry Reports 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Pathology | Personality Disorders (K Bertsch, Section Editor)

Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Opportunities and Challenges for Advancing the Diagnosis of Personality Pathology

Author: Steven K. Huprich

Published in: Current Psychiatry Reports | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The International Classification of Diseases-11th edition (ICD-11) is poised to make a dramatic change in the diagnosis of personality disorders by introducing a fully dimensionalized framework. In this paper, the history of this process is reviewed, along with international efforts taken to address some underlying concerns with this transition. Recent studies of this framework are also reviewed.

Recent Findings

Studies have concluded that the ICD-11 proposal is supported; however, there are a number of methodological limitations to these studies, including the utilization of measures that are not directly derived from the ICD-11 description of levels of personality severity and trait domains.

Summary

There is a clear need for additional studies with measures that directly reflect the ICD-11 description of personality disorders. While there are some potentially positive effects of moving toward the dimensional model, there are a number of concerns remaining about the clinical utility of moving in this way.
Literature
1.
go back to reference •• Tyrer P, Crawford M, Mulder R, Blashfield R, Farnam A, Reed GM. The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Personal Ment Health. 2011;5:246–59 This was the original paper that introduced the fully dimensionalized model of personality disorder diagnosis in ICD-11.CrossRef •• Tyrer P, Crawford M, Mulder R, Blashfield R, Farnam A, Reed GM. The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Personal Ment Health. 2011;5:246–59 This was the original paper that introduced the fully dimensionalized model of personality disorder diagnosis in ICD-11.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Silk KR. Commentary: the risks may be too high. Personal Ment Health. 2011;5:296–300.CrossRef Silk KR. Commentary: the risks may be too high. Personal Ment Health. 2011;5:296–300.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bornstein RF. Reconceptualizing personality pathology in DSM-5: limitations in evidence for eliminating dependent personality disorder and other DSM-IV syndromes. J Personal Disord. 2011;25:235–47.CrossRef Bornstein RF. Reconceptualizing personality pathology in DSM-5: limitations in evidence for eliminating dependent personality disorder and other DSM-IV syndromes. J Personal Disord. 2011;25:235–47.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Clarkin JF, Huprich SK. Do the DSM-5 proposals for personality disorders meet the criteria for clinical utility? J Personal Disord. 2011;25:192–205.CrossRef Clarkin JF, Huprich SK. Do the DSM-5 proposals for personality disorders meet the criteria for clinical utility? J Personal Disord. 2011;25:192–205.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tyrer P, Reed GM, Crawford MJ. Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder. Lancet. 2015;385:717–26.CrossRef Tyrer P, Reed GM, Crawford MJ. Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder. Lancet. 2015;385:717–26.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference •• Herpertz SC, Huprich SK, Bohus M, Chanen A, Goodman M, Mehlum L, et al. The challenge of transforming the diagnostic system of personality disorders. J Personal Disord. 2017;31:577–90 This paper from the international community provides an empirical and theoretical rationale for caution in moving toward a fully dimensionalized system.CrossRef •• Herpertz SC, Huprich SK, Bohus M, Chanen A, Goodman M, Mehlum L, et al. The challenge of transforming the diagnostic system of personality disorders. J Personal Disord. 2017;31:577–90 This paper from the international community provides an empirical and theoretical rationale for caution in moving toward a fully dimensionalized system.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference • Tyrer P, Crawford MJ, Sanatinia R, Tyrer H, Cooper S, et al. Preliminary studies of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorder in practice. Personal Ment Health. 2014;8:254–63 This is one of the first validation studies of the ICD-11 proposal for personality disorders.CrossRef • Tyrer P, Crawford MJ, Sanatinia R, Tyrer H, Cooper S, et al. Preliminary studies of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorder in practice. Personal Ment Health. 2014;8:254–63 This is one of the first validation studies of the ICD-11 proposal for personality disorders.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tyrer P (2000) Quick Personality Assessment Schedule: PAS-Q. In P. Tyrer (Ed.), Personality disorders: diagnosis, management, and course (2nd edl., pp. 181-190). London: Arnold. Tyrer P (2000) Quick Personality Assessment Schedule: PAS-Q. In P. Tyrer (Ed.), Personality disorders: diagnosis, management, and course (2nd edl., pp. 181-190). London: Arnold.
9.
go back to reference Tyrer P, Alexander MS, Cicchetti D, Cohen MS, Remington M. Reliability of a schedule for rating personality disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;135:168–74.CrossRef Tyrer P, Alexander MS, Cicchetti D, Cohen MS, Remington M. Reliability of a schedule for rating personality disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;135:168–74.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tyrer P, Coombs N, Ibrahimi F, Mathilakath A, Bajaj P, et al. Critical developments in the assessment of personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190(suppl 49):s51–9.CrossRef Tyrer P, Coombs N, Ibrahimi F, Mathilakath A, Bajaj P, et al. Critical developments in the assessment of personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190(suppl 49):s51–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tyrer, P., & Clark, L. A. (2007). Schedule for Personality Assessment from Notes and Documents (SPAN-DOC). Home Office. Tyrer, P., & Clark, L. A. (2007). Schedule for Personality Assessment from Notes and Documents (SPAN-DOC). Home Office.
12.
go back to reference • Kim Y, Blashfield R, Tyrer P, Hwang S, Lee H. Field trial of a putative research algorithm for diagnosing ICD-11 personality disorders in psychiatric patients: 1. Severity of personality disturbance. Personal Ment Health. 2014;8:67–78 This is one of the first studies of the initial ICD-11 personality disorder proposal.CrossRef • Kim Y, Blashfield R, Tyrer P, Hwang S, Lee H. Field trial of a putative research algorithm for diagnosing ICD-11 personality disorders in psychiatric patients: 1. Severity of personality disturbance. Personal Ment Health. 2014;8:67–78 This is one of the first studies of the initial ICD-11 personality disorder proposal.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Germans S, Van Heck GL, Moran P, Hodiamont PPG. The self-report standardized assessment of personality-abbreviated scale: preliminary results of a brief screening test for personality disorders. Personal Ment Health. 2008;2:70–6.CrossRef Germans S, Van Heck GL, Moran P, Hodiamont PPG. The self-report standardized assessment of personality-abbreviated scale: preliminary results of a brief screening test for personality disorders. Personal Ment Health. 2008;2:70–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference • Kim Y, Tyrer P, Lee H, Kim S, Hawng S, Lee G, et al. Preliminary field trial of a putative research algorithm for diagnosing ICD-11 personality disorders in psychiatric patients: 2. Proposed trait domains. Personal Ment Health. 2015;9:298–307 This is another initial study on the ICD-11 personality disorder proposal.CrossRef • Kim Y, Tyrer P, Lee H, Kim S, Hawng S, Lee G, et al. Preliminary field trial of a putative research algorithm for diagnosing ICD-11 personality disorders in psychiatric patients: 2. Proposed trait domains. Personal Ment Health. 2015;9:298–307 This is another initial study on the ICD-11 personality disorder proposal.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO PI-R Professional Manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992. Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO PI-R Professional Manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992.
16.
go back to reference • Kim Y, Tyrer P, Lee H, Kim S, Connan F, et al. Schedule for personality assessment from notes and documents (SPAN-DOC): preliminary validation, links to the ICD-11 classification of personality disorder, and use in eating disorders. Personal Ment Health. 2016;10:106–17 This is an early study on the ICD-11 personality disorder proposal.CrossRef • Kim Y, Tyrer P, Lee H, Kim S, Connan F, et al. Schedule for personality assessment from notes and documents (SPAN-DOC): preliminary validation, links to the ICD-11 classification of personality disorder, and use in eating disorders. Personal Ment Health. 2016;10:106–17 This is an early study on the ICD-11 personality disorder proposal.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tyrer P, Wang D, Tyrer H, Crawford M, Cooper S. Dimensions of dependence and their influence on the outcome of cognitive behavior therapy for health anxiety: randomized control trial. Personal Ment Health. 2016;10:96–105.CrossRef Tyrer P, Wang D, Tyrer H, Crawford M, Cooper S. Dimensions of dependence and their influence on the outcome of cognitive behavior therapy for health anxiety: randomized control trial. Personal Ment Health. 2016;10:96–105.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tyrer P, Tyrer H, Yang M, Guo B. Long-term impact of temporary and persistent personality disorder on anxiety and depressive disorders. Personal Ment Health. 2016;10:76–83.CrossRef Tyrer P, Tyrer H, Yang M, Guo B. Long-term impact of temporary and persistent personality disorder on anxiety and depressive disorders. Personal Ment Health. 2016;10:76–83.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference • Mulder R, Horwood J, Tyrer P, Carter J, Joyce PR. Validating the proposed ICD-11 domains. Personal Ment Health. 2016;10:84–95 This is another initial study on the validation of the ICD-11 personality disorder proposal.CrossRef • Mulder R, Horwood J, Tyrer P, Carter J, Joyce PR. Validating the proposed ICD-11 domains. Personal Ment Health. 2016;10:84–95 This is another initial study on the validation of the ICD-11 personality disorder proposal.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference • Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: the Personality Inventory for ICD-11. Psychol Assess. 2018;30:154–69 This paper introduces a validated measure of ICD-11 trait domains that was constructed from the ICD-11 proposal, unlike many other validation studies that rely on indirect measures of ICD-11 constructs.CrossRef • Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: the Personality Inventory for ICD-11. Psychol Assess. 2018;30:154–69 This paper introduces a validated measure of ICD-11 trait domains that was constructed from the ICD-11 proposal, unlike many other validation studies that rely on indirect measures of ICD-11 constructs.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Olajide K, Munjiza J, Moran PA, O’Connell L, Newton-Howes G, et al. Development and psychometric properties of the Standardized Assessment of Personality Disorder (SASPD). J Personal Disord. 2018;32:44–56.CrossRef Olajide K, Munjiza J, Moran PA, O’Connell L, Newton-Howes G, et al. Development and psychometric properties of the Standardized Assessment of Personality Disorder (SASPD). J Personal Disord. 2018;32:44–56.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kleindienst N, Lyssenko L, Bohus M. Commentary: validating the proposed ICD-11 domains: a comment on Mulder et al. (2016). Personal Ment Health. 2017;11:201–2.CrossRef Kleindienst N, Lyssenko L, Bohus M. Commentary: validating the proposed ICD-11 domains: a comment on Mulder et al. (2016). Personal Ment Health. 2017;11:201–2.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schmitt TA, Sass DA, Chapelle W, Thompson W. Selecting the “best” factor structure and moving measurement validation forward: an illustration. J Pers Assess. 2018;100:345–62.CrossRef Schmitt TA, Sass DA, Chapelle W, Thompson W. Selecting the “best” factor structure and moving measurement validation forward: an illustration. J Pers Assess. 2018;100:345–62.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Samuel DB, Griffin SA. A critical evaluation of retaining personality categories and types. In: Huprich SK, editor. Personality disorders: toward theoretical and empirical integration in diagnosis and assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2015. p. 43–62.CrossRef Samuel DB, Griffin SA. A critical evaluation of retaining personality categories and types. In: Huprich SK, editor. Personality disorders: toward theoretical and empirical integration in diagnosis and assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2015. p. 43–62.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Author; 2013.CrossRef American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Author; 2013.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Widiger TA, Bach B, Chmielewski M, Clark LA, DeYoung C, et al. Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. J Pers Assess. 2018;101:345–55.CrossRef Widiger TA, Bach B, Chmielewski M, Clark LA, DeYoung C, et al. Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. J Pers Assess. 2018;101:345–55.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Silk KR. The value of retaining personality disorder diagnoses. In: Huprich SK, editor. Personality disorders: toward theoretical and empirical integration in diagnosis and assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2015. p. 23–42.CrossRef Silk KR. The value of retaining personality disorder diagnoses. In: Huprich SK, editor. Personality disorders: toward theoretical and empirical integration in diagnosis and assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2015. p. 23–42.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference • Huprich SK. It’s time to move beyond categories and dimensions in personality pathology diagnosis and assessment. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;213:685–9 This article raises concerns about moving too rapidly toward a dimensionalized system and offers a compromise solution.CrossRef • Huprich SK. It’s time to move beyond categories and dimensions in personality pathology diagnosis and assessment. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;213:685–9 This article raises concerns about moving too rapidly toward a dimensionalized system and offers a compromise solution.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kernberg OF. Overview and critique of the classification of personality disorders proposed for DSM-V. Swiss Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 2012;163:234–8.CrossRef Kernberg OF. Overview and critique of the classification of personality disorders proposed for DSM-V. Swiss Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 2012;163:234–8.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference • Kernberg OF. What is personality? J Personal Disord. 2016;30:145–56 A very thoughtful article about what personality is and how we currently assess personality disorders.CrossRef • Kernberg OF. What is personality? J Personal Disord. 2016;30:145–56 A very thoughtful article about what personality is and how we currently assess personality disorders.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Huprich SK, Nelson S. Advancing the assessment of personality pathology with the cognitive-affective processing system. J Pers Assess. 2015;97:467–777.CrossRef Huprich SK, Nelson S. Advancing the assessment of personality pathology with the cognitive-affective processing system. J Pers Assess. 2015;97:467–777.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Huprich SK. Considering the evidence and making the most empirically-informed decision about depressive personality in the DSM-5. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2012;3:470–82.CrossRef Huprich SK. Considering the evidence and making the most empirically-informed decision about depressive personality in the DSM-5. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2012;3:470–82.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference •• Reed GM. Toward ICD-11: Improving the clinical utility of WHO’s internal classification of mental disorders. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2010;41:457–64 This paper discusses the need for improving the clinical utility of the ICD-11.CrossRef •• Reed GM. Toward ICD-11: Improving the clinical utility of WHO’s internal classification of mental disorders. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2010;41:457–64 This paper discusses the need for improving the clinical utility of the ICD-11.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Huprich SK. Personality pathology in primary care: ongoing needs for detection and intervention. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2018;25:43–54.CrossRef Huprich SK. Personality pathology in primary care: ongoing needs for detection and intervention. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2018;25:43–54.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Quirk ES, Berk M, Chanen AM, Koivumaa-Honkanen H, Brennan-Olsen SL, Pasco JA, et al. Population prevalence of personality disorder and associations with physical health comorbidities and health care service utilization: a review. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2016;7:136–46.CrossRef Quirk ES, Berk M, Chanen AM, Koivumaa-Honkanen H, Brennan-Olsen SL, Pasco JA, et al. Population prevalence of personality disorder and associations with physical health comorbidities and health care service utilization: a review. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2016;7:136–46.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Opportunities and Challenges for Advancing the Diagnosis of Personality Pathology
Author
Steven K. Huprich
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Pathology
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1523-3812
Electronic ISSN: 1535-1645
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01161-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Current Psychiatry Reports 8/2020 Go to the issue

Sleep Disorders (P Gehrman, Section Editor)

Neuropsychiatric Correlates of Narcolepsy

Child and Family Disaster Psychiatry (B Pfefferbaum, Section Editor)

Children’s Reactions to Media Coverage of War