Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2021

01-11-2021 | Pathology | Breast Oncology

Limited Reporting of Histopathologic Details in a Multi-Institutional Academic Cohort of Phyllodes Tumors: Time for Standardization

Authors: Laura H. Rosenberger, MD, MS, FACS, Liza M. Quintana, MD, Samantha M. Thomas, MS, Suniti N. Nimbkar, MD, Tina J. Hieken, MD, Kandice K. Ludwig, MD, Lisa K. Jacobs, MD, Megan E. Miller, MD, Kristalyn K. Gallagher, DO, Jasmine Wong, MD, Heather B. Neuman, MD, Jennifer Tseng, MD, Taryn E. Hassinger, MD, MS, Tari A. King, MD, James W. Jakub, MD, Rex C. Bentley, MD, Stuart J. Schnitt, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Phyllodes tumors are rare fibroepithelial neoplasms that are classified by tiered histopathologic features. While there are protocols for the reporting of cancer specimens, no standardized reporting protocol exists for phyllodes.

Methods

We performed an 11-institution contemporary review of phyllodes tumors. Granular histopathologic details were recorded, including the features specifically considered for phyllodes grade classification.

Results

Of 550 patients, median tumor size was 3.0 cm, 68.9% (= 379) of tumors were benign, 19.6% (= 108) were borderline, and 10.5% (= 58) were malignant. All cases reported the final tumor size and grade classification. Complete pathologic reporting of all histopathologic features was present in 15.3% (= 84) of cases, while an additional 35.6% (= 196) were missing only one or two features in the report. Individual details regarding the degree of stromal cellularity was not reported in 53.5% (= 294) of cases, degree of stromal atypia in 58.0% (= 319) of cases, presence of stromal overgrowth in 56.2% (= 309) of cases, stromal cell mitoses in 37.5% (= 206) of cases, and tumor border in 54.2% (= 298) of cases. The final margin status (negative vs. positive) was omitted in only 0.9% of cases, and the final negative margin width was specifically reported in 73.8% of cases. Reporting of details was similar across all sites.

Conclusion

In this academic cohort of phyllodes tumors, one or more histopathologic features were frequently omitted from the pathology report. While all features were considered by the pathologist for grading, this limited reporting reflects a lack of reporting consensus. We recommend that standardized reporting in the form of a synoptic-style cancer protocol be implemented for phyllodes tumors, similar to other rare tumors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rosen PP, Oberman HA. Tumors of the Mammary Gland. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1993. Rosen PP, Oberman HA. Tumors of the Mammary Gland. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1993.
2.
go back to reference Rosen PP. Rosen’s Breast Pathology, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2001. Rosen PP. Rosen’s Breast Pathology, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2001.
3.
go back to reference Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ (eds). World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition, Vol 2: Breast Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2019. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ (eds). World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition, Vol 2: Breast Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2019.
4.
go back to reference Tan PH, Ellis IO. Myoepithelial and epithelial-myoepithelial, mesenchymal and fibroepithelial breast lesions: updates from the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast 2012. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66:465–70.CrossRef Tan PH, Ellis IO. Myoepithelial and epithelial-myoepithelial, mesenchymal and fibroepithelial breast lesions: updates from the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast 2012. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66:465–70.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tan BY, Acs G, Apple SK, et al. Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a consensus review. Histopathology. 2016;68:5–21.CrossRef Tan BY, Acs G, Apple SK, et al. Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a consensus review. Histopathology. 2016;68:5–21.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Connolly JL, Fletcher CD. What is needed to satisfy the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (COC) requirements for the pathologic reporting of cancer specimens? Hum Pathol. 2003;34:111.CrossRef Connolly JL, Fletcher CD. What is needed to satisfy the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (COC) requirements for the pathologic reporting of cancer specimens? Hum Pathol. 2003;34:111.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rosenberger LH, Thomas SM, Nimbkar SN, et al. Germline genetic mutations in a multi-center contemporary cohort of 550 phyllodes tumors; an opportunity for expanded multi-gene panel testing. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;10:3633–40.CrossRef Rosenberger LH, Thomas SM, Nimbkar SN, et al. Germline genetic mutations in a multi-center contemporary cohort of 550 phyllodes tumors; an opportunity for expanded multi-gene panel testing. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;10:3633–40.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rosenberger LH, Thomas SM, Nimbkar SN, et al. Contemporary multi-institutional cohort of 550 cases of phyllodes tumors (2007–2017) demonstrates a need for more individualized margin guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:178–89.CrossRef Rosenberger LH, Thomas SM, Nimbkar SN, et al. Contemporary multi-institutional cohort of 550 cases of phyllodes tumors (2007–2017) demonstrates a need for more individualized margin guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:178–89.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tan PH, Thike AA, Tan WJ, et al. Predicting clinical behavior of breast phyllodes tumours: a nomogram based on histological criteria and surgical margins. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:69–76.CrossRef Tan PH, Thike AA, Tan WJ, et al. Predicting clinical behavior of breast phyllodes tumours: a nomogram based on histological criteria and surgical margins. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:69–76.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lu Y, Chen Y, Zhu L, et al. Local recurrence of benign, borderline, and malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:1263–75.CrossRef Lu Y, Chen Y, Zhu L, et al. Local recurrence of benign, borderline, and malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:1263–75.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ouyang Q, Li S, Tan C, et al. Benign phyllodes tumor of the breast diagnosed after ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy: surgical excision or wait-and-watch? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1129–34.CrossRef Ouyang Q, Li S, Tan C, et al. Benign phyllodes tumor of the breast diagnosed after ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy: surgical excision or wait-and-watch? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1129–34.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Limited Reporting of Histopathologic Details in a Multi-Institutional Academic Cohort of Phyllodes Tumors: Time for Standardization
Authors
Laura H. Rosenberger, MD, MS, FACS
Liza M. Quintana, MD
Samantha M. Thomas, MS
Suniti N. Nimbkar, MD
Tina J. Hieken, MD
Kandice K. Ludwig, MD
Lisa K. Jacobs, MD
Megan E. Miller, MD
Kristalyn K. Gallagher, DO
Jasmine Wong, MD
Heather B. Neuman, MD
Jennifer Tseng, MD
Taryn E. Hassinger, MD, MS
Tari A. King, MD
James W. Jakub, MD
Rex C. Bentley, MD
Stuart J. Schnitt, MD
Publication date
01-11-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Pathology
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10118-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2021 Go to the issue