Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Parkinson's Disease | Research article

Implementation of highly challenging balance training for Parkinson’s disease in clinical practice: a process evaluation

Authors: Breiffni Leavy, Conran Joseph, Lydia Kwak, Erika Franzén

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Process evaluations provide contextual insight into the way in which interventions are delivered. This information is essential when designing strategies to implement programs into wider clinical practice. We performed a process evaluation of the HiBalance effectiveness trial investigating the effects of a 10-week of highly challenging and progressive balance training for mild-moderate Parkinson’s disease (PD). Study aims were to investigate i) the quality and quantity of intervention delivery and ii) barriers and facilitators for implementation.

Methods

Process outcomes included; Fidelity; Dose (delivered and received) Recruitment and Reach. Investigation of barriers and facilitators was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Program delivery was assessed across four neurological rehabilitation sites during a two-year period. Data collection was mixed-methods in nature and quantitative and qualitative data were merged during the analysis phase.

Results

Thirteen program trainers delivered the intervention to 12 separate groups during 119 training sessions. Trainer fidelity to program core components was very high in 104 (87%) of the sessions. Participant responsiveness to the core components was generally high, although adherence to the home exercise program was low (50%). No significant context-specific differences were observed across sites in terms of fidelity, dose delivered/ received or participant characteristics, despite varying recruitment methods. Facilitators to program delivery were; PD-specificity, high training frequency and professional autonomy. Perceived barriers included; cognitive impairment, absent reactional balance among participants, as well a heterogeneous group in relation to balance capacity.

Conclusion

These findings provide corroborating evidence for outcome evaluation results and valuable information for the further adaptation and implementation of this program. Important lessons can also be learned for researchers and clinicians planning to implement challenging exercise training programs for people with mild-moderate PD.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02727478, registered 30 march, 2016 − Retrospectively registered.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fraser M, et al. Intervention research- developing social programs. New, York: Oxford University Press; 2009. Fraser M, et al. Intervention research- developing social programs. New, York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
2.
go back to reference Moore GF, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRef Moore GF, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mak MK, Wong-Yu IS, Shen X, Chung CL. Long-term effects of exercise and physical therapy in people with Parkinson disease: Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(11):689–703. Mak MK, Wong-Yu IS, Shen X, Chung CL. Long-term effects of exercise and physical therapy in people with Parkinson disease: Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(11):689–703.
4.
go back to reference Goodwin VA, et al. The effectiveness of exercise interventions for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2008;23(5):631–40.CrossRef Goodwin VA, et al. The effectiveness of exercise interventions for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2008;23(5):631–40.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tomlinson CL, et al. Physiotherapy for Parkinson's disease: a comparison of techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;6:CD002815. Tomlinson CL, et al. Physiotherapy for Parkinson's disease: a comparison of techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;6:CD002815.
6.
go back to reference Ellis TD, Dibble LE, Peterson DS. Moving beyond effectiveness. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2019;43(1):1–2.CrossRef Ellis TD, Dibble LE, Peterson DS. Moving beyond effectiveness. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2019;43(1):1–2.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Masterson-Algar P, Burton CR, Rycroft-Malone J. Process evaluations in neurological rehabilitation: a mixed-evidence systematic review and recommendations for future research. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e013002.CrossRef Masterson-Algar P, Burton CR, Rycroft-Malone J. Process evaluations in neurological rehabilitation: a mixed-evidence systematic review and recommendations for future research. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e013002.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bakker FC, et al. Uniform presentation of process evaluation results facilitates the evaluation of complex interventions: development of a graph. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(1):97–102.CrossRef Bakker FC, et al. Uniform presentation of process evaluation results facilitates the evaluation of complex interventions: development of a graph. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(1):97–102.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Conradsson D, et al. The effects of highly challenging balance training in elderly with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(9):827–36.CrossRef Conradsson D, et al. The effects of highly challenging balance training in elderly with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(9):827–36.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Leavy B, et al. Outcome evaluation of highly challenging balance training for people with Parkinson disease: a multicenter effectiveness-implementation study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(1):15–22.CrossRef Leavy B, et al. Outcome evaluation of highly challenging balance training for people with Parkinson disease: a multicenter effectiveness-implementation study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(1):15–22.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Curran GM, et al. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–26.CrossRef Curran GM, et al. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–26.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leavy B, et al. Evaluation and implementation of highly challenging balance training in clinical practice for people with Parkinson's disease: protocol for the HiBalance effectiveness-implementation trial. BMC Neurol. 2017;17(1):27.CrossRef Leavy B, et al. Evaluation and implementation of highly challenging balance training in clinical practice for people with Parkinson's disease: protocol for the HiBalance effectiveness-implementation trial. BMC Neurol. 2017;17(1):27.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Plano Clark VL, et al. Mixing quantitative and qualitative approaches - An introduction to Emergent Mixed Methods Research. In: Hesse-Biber SN, LP, editors. Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: The Guilford press; 2008. p. 363–89. Plano Clark VL, et al. Mixing quantitative and qualitative approaches - An introduction to Emergent Mixed Methods Research. In: Hesse-Biber SN, LP, editors. Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: The Guilford press; 2008. p. 363–89.
14.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.
15.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRef Damschroder LJ, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):726–32.CrossRef Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):726–32.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Thompson W, Gordoon N, LS P. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2010. Thompson W, Gordoon N, LS P. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2010.
18.
go back to reference Brownson RC, Colditz G, Proctor E. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health- Translating Science to Practice. New York: Oxford University press; 2012.CrossRef Brownson RC, Colditz G, Proctor E. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health- Translating Science to Practice. New York: Oxford University press; 2012.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRef Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mayring, P., Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2000. 1(2). Mayring, P., Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2000. 1(2).
21.
go back to reference Kelly VE, Eusterbrock AJ, Shumway-Cook A. A review of dual-task walking deficits in people with Parkinson's disease: motor and cognitive contributions, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Parkinsons Dis. 2012;2012:918719.PubMed Kelly VE, Eusterbrock AJ, Shumway-Cook A. A review of dual-task walking deficits in people with Parkinson's disease: motor and cognitive contributions, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Parkinsons Dis. 2012;2012:918719.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Wu T, Hallett M. Neural correlates of dual task performance in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(7):760–6.CrossRef Wu T, Hallett M. Neural correlates of dual task performance in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(7):760–6.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fritz NE, Cheek FM, Nichols-Larsen DS. Motor-cognitive dual-task training in persons with neurologic disorders: a systematic review. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015;39(3):142–53.CrossRef Fritz NE, Cheek FM, Nichols-Larsen DS. Motor-cognitive dual-task training in persons with neurologic disorders: a systematic review. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015;39(3):142–53.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Strouwen C, et al. Determinants of dual-task training effect size in Parkinson disease: who will benefit Most? J Neurol Phys Ther. 2019;43(1):3–11.CrossRef Strouwen C, et al. Determinants of dual-task training effect size in Parkinson disease: who will benefit Most? J Neurol Phys Ther. 2019;43(1):3–11.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lofgren N, et al. Factors associated with responsiveness to gait and balance training in people with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2019;43(1):42–9.CrossRef Lofgren N, et al. Factors associated with responsiveness to gait and balance training in people with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2019;43(1):42–9.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Strouwen C, et al. Dual tasking in Parkinson's disease: should we train hazardous behavior? Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15(9):1031–9.CrossRef Strouwen C, et al. Dual tasking in Parkinson's disease: should we train hazardous behavior? Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15(9):1031–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Zirek E, et al. Which cognitive dual-task walking causes most interference on the timed up and go test in Parkinson's disease: a controlled study. Neurol Sci. 2018;39(12):2151–7.CrossRef Zirek E, et al. Which cognitive dual-task walking causes most interference on the timed up and go test in Parkinson's disease: a controlled study. Neurol Sci. 2018;39(12):2151–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Haas R, et al. Clinical decision making in exercise prescription for fall prevention. Phys Ther. 2012;92(5):666–79.CrossRef Haas R, et al. Clinical decision making in exercise prescription for fall prevention. Phys Ther. 2012;92(5):666–79.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Farlie MK, et al. Intensity of challenge to the balance system is not reported in the prescription of balance exercises in randomised trials: a systematic review. Aust J Phys. 2013;59(4):227–35. Farlie MK, et al. Intensity of challenge to the balance system is not reported in the prescription of balance exercises in randomised trials: a systematic review. Aust J Phys. 2013;59(4):227–35.
30.
go back to reference Farlie MK, et al. The balance intensity scales for therapists and exercisers measure balance exercise intensity in older adults: initial validation using Rasch Analysis. Phys Ther. 2019;99(10):1394–404.CrossRef Farlie MK, et al. The balance intensity scales for therapists and exercisers measure balance exercise intensity in older adults: initial validation using Rasch Analysis. Phys Ther. 2019;99(10):1394–404.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hornby TG, et al. Clinical practice guideline to improve Locomotor function following chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(1):49–100.CrossRef Hornby TG, et al. Clinical practice guideline to improve Locomotor function following chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(1):49–100.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Abbruzzese G, et al. Rehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: current outlook and future challenges. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;22(Suppl 1):S60–4.CrossRef Abbruzzese G, et al. Rehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: current outlook and future challenges. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;22(Suppl 1):S60–4.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lacroix A, et al. Effects of supervised vs. unsupervised training programs on balance and muscle strength in older adults: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2017;47(11):2341–61.CrossRef Lacroix A, et al. Effects of supervised vs. unsupervised training programs on balance and muscle strength in older adults: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2017;47(11):2341–61.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference King LA, et al. Effects of group, individual, and home exercise in persons with Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015;39(4):204–12.CrossRef King LA, et al. Effects of group, individual, and home exercise in persons with Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015;39(4):204–12.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Atterbury EM, Welman KE. Balance training in individuals with Parkinson's disease: Therapist-supervised vs. home-based exercise programme. Gait Posture. 2017;55:138–44.CrossRef Atterbury EM, Welman KE. Balance training in individuals with Parkinson's disease: Therapist-supervised vs. home-based exercise programme. Gait Posture. 2017;55:138–44.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Flynn A, et al. Home-based prescribed exercise improves balance-related activities in people with Parkinson's disease and has benefits similar to Centre-based exercise: a systematic review. Aust J Phys. 2019;65(4):189–99. Flynn A, et al. Home-based prescribed exercise improves balance-related activities in people with Parkinson's disease and has benefits similar to Centre-based exercise: a systematic review. Aust J Phys. 2019;65(4):189–99.
37.
go back to reference French DP, et al. Which behaviour change techniques are most effective at increasing older adults' self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour? A systematic review. Ann Behav Med. 2014;48(2):225–34.CrossRef French DP, et al. Which behaviour change techniques are most effective at increasing older adults' self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour? A systematic review. Ann Behav Med. 2014;48(2):225–34.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference McEwan D, et al. The effectiveness of multi-component goal setting interventions for changing physical activity behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):67–88.CrossRef McEwan D, et al. The effectiveness of multi-component goal setting interventions for changing physical activity behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):67–88.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Liu H, et al. Process evaluations of primary care interventions addressing chronic disease: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e025127.CrossRef Liu H, et al. Process evaluations of primary care interventions addressing chronic disease: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e025127.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Implementation of highly challenging balance training for Parkinson’s disease in clinical practice: a process evaluation
Authors
Breiffni Leavy
Conran Joseph
Lydia Kwak
Erika Franzén
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02031-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Geriatrics 1/2021 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.