Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 10/2020

Open Access 01-10-2020 | Panitumumab | Original Article – Clinical Oncology

Dynamics in treatment response and disease progression of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with focus on BRAF status and primary tumor location: analysis of untreated RAS-wild-type mCRC patients receiving FOLFOXIRI either with or without panitumumab in the VOLFI trial (AIO KRK0109)

Authors: A. Kurreck, M. Geissler, U. M. Martens, J. Riera-Knorrenschild, J. Greeve, A. Florschütz, S. Wessendorf, T. Ettrich, S. Kanzler, D. Nörenberg, M. Seidensticker, S. Held, P. Buechner-Steudel, J. Atzpodien, V. Heinemann, S. Stintzing, T. Seufferlein, A. Tannapfel, A. C. Reinacher-Schick, D. P. Modest

Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In mCRC, disease dynamics may play a critical role in the understanding of long-term outcome. We evaluated depth of response (DpR), time to DpR, and post-DpR survival as relevant endpoints.

Methods

We analyzed DpR by central review of computer tomography images (change from baseline to smallest tumor diameter), early tumor shrinkage (≥ 20% reduction in tumor diameter at first reassessment), time to DpR (study randomization to DpR-image), post-DpR progression-free survival (pPFS = DpR-image to tumor progression or death), and post-DpR overall survival (pOS = DpR-image to death) with special focus on BRAF status in 66 patients and primary tumor site in 86 patients treated within the VOLFI-trial, respectively.

Results

BRAF wild-type (BRAF-WT) compared to BRAF mutant (BRAF-MT) patients had greater DpR (− 57.6% vs. − 40.8%, p = 0.013) with a comparable time to DpR [4.0 (95% CI 3.1–4.4) vs. 3.9 (95% CI 2.5–5.5) months; p = 0.8852]. pPFS was 6.5 (95% CI 4.9–8.0) versus 2.6 (95% CI 1.2–4.0) months in favor of BRAF-WT patients (HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.11–0.53); p < 0.001). This transferred into a significant difference in pOS [33.6 (95% CI 26.0–41.3) vs. 5.4 (95% CI 5.0–5.9) months; HR 0.27 (95% CI 0.13–0.55); p < 0.001]. Similar observations were made for patients stratified for primary tumor site.

Conclusions

BRAF-MT patients derive a less profound treatment response compared to BRAF-WT patients. The difference in outcome according to BRAF status is evident after achievement of DpR with BRAF-MT patients hardly deriving any further disease control beyond DpR. Our observations hint towards an aggressive tumor evolution in BRAF-MT tumors, which may already be molecularly detectable at the time of DpR.
Literature
go back to reference Chibaudel B et al (2011) Alternative end points to evaluate a therapeutic strategy in advanced colorectal cancer: evaluation of progression-free survival, duration of disease control, and time to failure of strategy—an Aide et Recherche en Cancerologie Digestive Group Study. J Clin Oncol 29:4199–4204. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.35.5867CrossRefPubMed Chibaudel B et al (2011) Alternative end points to evaluate a therapeutic strategy in advanced colorectal cancer: evaluation of progression-free survival, duration of disease control, and time to failure of strategy—an Aide et Recherche en Cancerologie Digestive Group Study. J Clin Oncol 29:4199–4204. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2011.​35.​5867CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cremolini C et al (2020) Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab and reintroduction after progression versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRIBE2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 21:497–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30862-9CrossRefPubMed Cremolini C et al (2020) Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab and reintroduction after progression versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRIBE2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 21:497–507. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(19)30862-9CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cremolini C et al (2015a) Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: results from phase III TRIBE trial by the Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest. Ann Oncol 26:1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv112CrossRefPubMed Cremolini C et al (2015a) Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: results from phase III TRIBE trial by the Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest. Ann Oncol 26:1188–1194. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mdv112CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dynamics in treatment response and disease progression of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with focus on BRAF status and primary tumor location: analysis of untreated RAS-wild-type mCRC patients receiving FOLFOXIRI either with or without panitumumab in the VOLFI trial (AIO KRK0109)
Authors
A. Kurreck
M. Geissler
U. M. Martens
J. Riera-Knorrenschild
J. Greeve
A. Florschütz
S. Wessendorf
T. Ettrich
S. Kanzler
D. Nörenberg
M. Seidensticker
S. Held
P. Buechner-Steudel
J. Atzpodien
V. Heinemann
S. Stintzing
T. Seufferlein
A. Tannapfel
A. C. Reinacher-Schick
D. P. Modest
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03257-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 10/2020 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.