Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2007

01-04-2007

Pancreatic transplants: secretin-stimulated MR pancreatography

Authors: Piero Boraschi, Francescamaria Donati, Roberto Gigoni, Francesco Odoguardi, Emanuele Neri, Ugo Boggi, Fabio Falaschi, Carlo Bartolozzi

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Our study was aimed to evaluate the functional status of pancreatic transplants using dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation.

Methods

Thirteen asymptomatic patients previously submitted to isolated pancreas (n = 6) or combined kidney–pancreas (n = 7) transplantation, with enteric-portal pancreatic drainage, underwent MR examination at 1.5 T using a phased-array coil. After the acquisition of axial and coronal T1- and T2-weighted sequences, dynamic MR pancreatography was performed using a coronal breath-hold, thick-slab (40–60 mm), single-shot T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence. After the intravenous administration of secretin (Secrelux®, Sanochemia; 1 cU/kg body/weight), a single-slice image acquisition was repeated every 30 s up to 15 min. We estimated the calibre changes of the pancreatic ductal system and the filling of the donor’s duodenum on the basis of pancreatic secretion after secretin stimulation, also evaluated by using a mean signal intensity/time histogram in a chosen region of interest including the transplanted pancreas and the connected small bowel.

Results

All patients well tolerated the examination, and no side effects were reported after secretin administration. In 12/13 cases, a significant increase (more than 1 mm) in the diameter of the mean pancreatic duct was observed after secretin stimulation; in all patients, a noticeable filling of the duodenal graft was demonstrated during dynamic MR pancreatography on both qualitative and quantitative analyses.

Conclusions

Dynamic MR imaging after secretin administration allows non-invasive evaluation of exocrine function of the pancreatic transplants and could be used to differentiate patients with graft rejection from those with normal graft function.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stratta RJ, Taylor RJ, Bynon JS, et al. (1994) Patterns of rejection after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 26:524–525PubMed Stratta RJ, Taylor RJ, Bynon JS, et al. (1994) Patterns of rejection after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 26:524–525PubMed
2.
go back to reference Cappelliez O, Delhaye M, Deviere J, et al. (2000) Chronic pancreatitis: evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 215:358–364 Cappelliez O, Delhaye M, Deviere J, et al. (2000) Chronic pancreatitis: evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 215:358–364
3.
go back to reference Monill J, Pernas J, Clavero J, et al. (2004) Pancreatic duct after pancreatoduodenectomy: morphologic and functional evaluation with secretin-stimulated MR pancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1267–1274PubMed Monill J, Pernas J, Clavero J, et al. (2004) Pancreatic duct after pancreatoduodenectomy: morphologic and functional evaluation with secretin-stimulated MR pancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1267–1274PubMed
4.
go back to reference Heverhagen JT, Wagner HJ, Ebel H, et al. (2004) Pancreatic transplants: noninvasive evaluation with secretin-augmented MR pancreatography and MR perfusion measurements: preliminary results. Radiology 233:273–280PubMedCrossRef Heverhagen JT, Wagner HJ, Ebel H, et al. (2004) Pancreatic transplants: noninvasive evaluation with secretin-augmented MR pancreatography and MR perfusion measurements: preliminary results. Radiology 233:273–280PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Neri E, Cappelli C, Boggi U, et al. (2004) Multirow CT in the follow-up of pancreas transplantation. Transplant Proc 36:597–600PubMedCrossRef Neri E, Cappelli C, Boggi U, et al. (2004) Multirow CT in the follow-up of pancreas transplantation. Transplant Proc 36:597–600PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Robertson RP, Davis C, Larsen J, et al. (2003) Pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabete Care 26(suppl 1):S120 Robertson RP, Davis C, Larsen J, et al. (2003) Pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabete Care 26(suppl 1):S120
7.
go back to reference Boggi U, Vistoli F, Del Chiaro M, et al. (2004) Retroperitoneal pancreastransplantation with portal-enteric drainage. Transplant Proc 36:571–574PubMedCrossRef Boggi U, Vistoli F, Del Chiaro M, et al. (2004) Retroperitoneal pancreastransplantation with portal-enteric drainage. Transplant Proc 36:571–574PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Boggi U, Vistoli F, Signori S, et al. (2005) A technique for retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage. Transplantation 79:1137–1142PubMedCrossRef Boggi U, Vistoli F, Signori S, et al. (2005) A technique for retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage. Transplantation 79:1137–1142PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sollinger HW, Messing EM, Eckhoff DE, et al. (1993) Urological complications in 210 consecutive simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants with bladder drainage. Ann Surg 218:561–570PubMedCrossRef Sollinger HW, Messing EM, Eckhoff DE, et al. (1993) Urological complications in 210 consecutive simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants with bladder drainage. Ann Surg 218:561–570PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Matte J, Fery F, Lankoande C, et al. (1995) Insulin secretion and glucose tolerance evolution in kidney–pancreas graft. Transplant Proc 27:3073–3074PubMed Matte J, Fery F, Lankoande C, et al. (1995) Insulin secretion and glucose tolerance evolution in kidney–pancreas graft. Transplant Proc 27:3073–3074PubMed
11.
go back to reference Boggi U, Mosca F, Vistoli F, et al. (2005) Ninety-five percent insulin independence rate 3 years after pancreas transplantation alone with portal-enteric drainage. Transplant Proc 37:1274–1277PubMedCrossRef Boggi U, Mosca F, Vistoli F, et al. (2005) Ninety-five percent insulin independence rate 3 years after pancreas transplantation alone with portal-enteric drainage. Transplant Proc 37:1274–1277PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kuo PC, Johnson LB, Schweitzer EJ, et al. (1997) Simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation: a comparison of enteric and bladder drainage of exocrine pancreatic secretions. Transplantation 63:238–243PubMedCrossRef Kuo PC, Johnson LB, Schweitzer EJ, et al. (1997) Simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation: a comparison of enteric and bladder drainage of exocrine pancreatic secretions. Transplantation 63:238–243PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Philosophe B, Farney AC, Schweitzer EJ, et al. (2001) Superiority of portal venous drainage over systemic venous drainage in pancreas transplantation: a retrospective study. Ann Surg 234:689–696PubMedCrossRef Philosophe B, Farney AC, Schweitzer EJ, et al. (2001) Superiority of portal venous drainage over systemic venous drainage in pancreas transplantation: a retrospective study. Ann Surg 234:689–696PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Papadimitriou JC, Drachenberg CB, Wiland A, et al. (1998) Histologic grading of acute allograft rejection in pancreas needle biopsy: correlation to serum enzymes, glycemia, and response to immunosuppressive treatment. Transplantation 66:1741–1745PubMedCrossRef Papadimitriou JC, Drachenberg CB, Wiland A, et al. (1998) Histologic grading of acute allograft rejection in pancreas needle biopsy: correlation to serum enzymes, glycemia, and response to immunosuppressive treatment. Transplantation 66:1741–1745PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sugitani A, Egidi MF, Gritsch HA, et al. (1998) Serum lipase as a marker for pancreatic allograft rejection. Clin Transplant 12:224–227PubMed Sugitani A, Egidi MF, Gritsch HA, et al. (1998) Serum lipase as a marker for pancreatic allograft rejection. Clin Transplant 12:224–227PubMed
16.
go back to reference Gruessner RW, Kendall DM, Drangstveit MB, et al. (1997) Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from live donors. Ann Surg 226: 471–480PubMedCrossRef Gruessner RW, Kendall DM, Drangstveit MB, et al. (1997) Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from live donors. Ann Surg 226: 471–480PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nikolaidis P, Amin RS, Hwang CM, et al. (2003) Role of sonography in pancreatic transplantation. RadioGraphics 23:939–949PubMedCrossRef Nikolaidis P, Amin RS, Hwang CM, et al. (2003) Role of sonography in pancreatic transplantation. RadioGraphics 23:939–949PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wong JJ, Krebs TL, Klassen DK, et al. (1996) Sonographic evaluation of acute pancreatic transplant rejection: morphology-Doppler analysis versus guided percutaneous biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:803–807PubMed Wong JJ, Krebs TL, Klassen DK, et al. (1996) Sonographic evaluation of acute pancreatic transplant rejection: morphology-Doppler analysis versus guided percutaneous biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:803–807PubMed
19.
go back to reference Atwell TD, German B, Larson TS, et al. (2004) Pancreas transplants: experience wih 232 percutaneous US-guided biopsy procedures in 88 patients. Radiology 231:845–849PubMedCrossRef Atwell TD, German B, Larson TS, et al. (2004) Pancreas transplants: experience wih 232 percutaneous US-guided biopsy procedures in 88 patients. Radiology 231:845–849PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lee BC, McGahan JP, Perez RV, et al. (2000) The role of percutaneous biopsy in detection of pancreatic transplant rejection. Clin Transplant 14:493–498PubMedCrossRef Lee BC, McGahan JP, Perez RV, et al. (2000) The role of percutaneous biopsy in detection of pancreatic transplant rejection. Clin Transplant 14:493–498PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kelcz F, Sollinger HW, Pirsch JD (1991) MRI of the pancreas transplant: lack of correlation between imaging and clinical status. Magn Reson Med 21:30–38PubMedCrossRef Kelcz F, Sollinger HW, Pirsch JD (1991) MRI of the pancreas transplant: lack of correlation between imaging and clinical status. Magn Reson Med 21:30–38PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vahey TN, Glazer GM, Francis IR, et al. (1988) MR diagnosis of pancreatic transplant rejection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:557–560PubMed Vahey TN, Glazer GM, Francis IR, et al. (1988) MR diagnosis of pancreatic transplant rejection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:557–560PubMed
23.
go back to reference Fernandez MP, Bernardino ME, Neylan JF, et al. (1991) Diagnosis of pancreatic transplant dysfunction: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:1171–1176PubMed Fernandez MP, Bernardino ME, Neylan JF, et al. (1991) Diagnosis of pancreatic transplant dysfunction: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:1171–1176PubMed
24.
go back to reference Krebs TL, Daly B, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, et al. (1999) Acute pancreatic transplant rejection: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging compared with histopathologic analysis. Radiology 210:437–442PubMed Krebs TL, Daly B, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, et al. (1999) Acute pancreatic transplant rejection: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging compared with histopathologic analysis. Radiology 210:437–442PubMed
Metadata
Title
Pancreatic transplants: secretin-stimulated MR pancreatography
Authors
Piero Boraschi
Francescamaria Donati
Roberto Gigoni
Francesco Odoguardi
Emanuele Neri
Ugo Boggi
Fabio Falaschi
Carlo Bartolozzi
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9178-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Abdominal Radiology 2/2007 Go to the issue

Feature Section, Ultrasonography of the Pancreas

Guest Editors’ introduction

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.