Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Pancreatic Surgery | Research

Robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery in the elderly patient: experiences from a high-volume centre

Authors: Karl H. Hillebrandt, Sebastian Knitter, Lea Timmermann, Matthäus Felsenstein, Christian Benzing, Moritz Schmelzle, Johann Pratschke, Thomas Malinka

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery (RPS) has fundamentally developed over the past few years. For subgroups, e.g. elderly patients, applicability and safety of RPS still needs to be defined. Given prognosticated demographic developments, we aim to assess the role of RPS based on preoperative, operative and postoperative parameters.

Methods

We included 129 patients undergoing RPS at our institution between 2017 and 2020. Eleven patients required conversion to open surgery and were excluded from further analysis. We divided patients into two groups; ≥ 70 years old (Group 1; n = 32) and < 70 years old (Group 2; n = 86) at time of resection.

Results

Most preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups. However, number of patients with previous abdominal surgery was significantly higher in patients ≥ 70 years old (78% vs 37%, p < 0.0001). Operative characteristics did not significantly differ between both groups. Although patients ≥ 70 years old stayed significantly longer at ICU (1.8 vs 0.9 days; p = 0.037), length of hospital stay and postoperative morbidity were equivalent between the groups.

Conclusion

RPS is safe and feasible in elderly patients and shows non-inferiority when compared with younger patients. However, prospectively collected data is needed to define the role of RPS in elderly patients accurately.
Trial registration Clinical Trial Register: Deutschen Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS; German Clinical Trials Register). Clinical Registration Number: DRKS00017229 (retrospectively registered, Date of Registration: 2019/07/19, Date of First Enrollment: 2017/10/18).
Literature
2.
go back to reference 1 Recommendations|Gallstone disease: diagnosis and management|Guidance|NICE. 1 Recommendations|Gallstone disease: diagnosis and management|Guidance|NICE.
8.
go back to reference Liu Q, Zhao Z, Zhang X, Zhao G, Tan X, Gao Y, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly and younger patients: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2020;81:61–5.CrossRefPubMed Liu Q, Zhao Z, Zhang X, Zhao G, Tan X, Gao Y, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly and younger patients: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2020;81:61–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference van der Heijde N, Balduzzi A, Alseidi A, Dokmak S, Polanco PM, Sandford D, et al. The role of older age and obesity in minimally invasive and open pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2020;20:1234–42.CrossRefPubMed van der Heijde N, Balduzzi A, Alseidi A, Dokmak S, Polanco PM, Sandford D, et al. The role of older age and obesity in minimally invasive and open pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2020;20:1234–42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Petrowsky H, Clavien PA. Should we deny surgery for malignant hepato-pancreatico-biliary tumors to elderly patients? World J Surg. 2005;29:1093–100.CrossRefPubMed Petrowsky H, Clavien PA. Should we deny surgery for malignant hepato-pancreatico-biliary tumors to elderly patients? World J Surg. 2005;29:1093–100.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery in the elderly patient: experiences from a high-volume centre
Authors
Karl H. Hillebrandt
Sebastian Knitter
Lea Timmermann
Matthäus Felsenstein
Christian Benzing
Moritz Schmelzle
Johann Pratschke
Thomas Malinka
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01395-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue