Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Gastrointestinal

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PNET): Staging accuracy of MDCT and its diagnostic performance for the differentiation of PNET with uncommon CT findings from pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Authors: Jung Hoon Kim, Hyo Won Eun, Young Jae Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Joon Koo Han, Byung-Ihn Choi

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate staging accuracy of multidetector CT (MDCT) for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PNET) and diagnostic performance for differentiation of PNET from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Material and methods

We included 109 patients with surgically proven PNET (NETG1 = 66, NETG2 = 31, NEC = 12) who underwent MDCT. Two reviewers assessed stage and presence of predefined CT findings. We analysed the relationship between CT findings and tumour grade. Using PNETs with uncommon findings, we also estimated the possibility of PNET or adenocarcinoma.

Results

Accuracy for T stage was 85–88 % and N-metastasis was 83–89 %. Common findings included well circumscribed, homogeneously enhanced, hypervascular mass, common in lower grade tumours (p < 0.05). Uncommon findings included ill-defined, heterogeneously enhanced, hypovascular mass and duct dilation, common in higher grade tumours (p < 0.05). Using 31 PNETs with uncommon findings, diagnostic performance for differentiation from adenocarcinoma was 0.760–0.806. Duct dilatation was an independent predictor for adenocarcinoma (Exp(B) = 4.569). PNETs with uncommon findings were associated with significantly worse survival versus PNET with common findings (62.7 vs. 95.7 months, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

MDCT is useful for preoperative evaluation of PNET; it not only accurately depicts the tumour stage but also prediction of tumour grade, because uncommon findings were more common in higher grade tumours.

Key Points

CT accurately depicts the T stage and node metastasis of PNET.
Uncommon findings were more common in higher grade tumours.
CT information may be beneficial for optimal therapeutic planning.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ehehalt F, Saeger HD, Schmidt CM, Grützmann R (2009) Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Oncologist 14:456–467CrossRefPubMed Ehehalt F, Saeger HD, Schmidt CM, Grützmann R (2009) Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Oncologist 14:456–467CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Owen N, Sohaib S, Peppercorn P et al (2001) MRI of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Radiol 74:968–973CrossRefPubMed Owen N, Sohaib S, Peppercorn P et al (2001) MRI of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Radiol 74:968–973CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. World Health Organization Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. World Health Organization
4.
go back to reference Ekeblad S, Skogseid B, Dunder K, Öberg K, Eriksson B (2008) Prognostic factors and survival in 324 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumor treated at a single institution. Clin Cancer Res 14:7798–7803CrossRefPubMed Ekeblad S, Skogseid B, Dunder K, Öberg K, Eriksson B (2008) Prognostic factors and survival in 324 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumor treated at a single institution. Clin Cancer Res 14:7798–7803CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H et al (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449:395–401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H et al (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449:395–401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Sellner F, Thalhammer S, Stättner S, Karner J, Klimpfinger M (2011) TNM stage and grade in predicting the prognosis of operated, non‐functioning neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas—a single‐institution experience. J Surg Oncol 104:17–21CrossRefPubMed Sellner F, Thalhammer S, Stättner S, Karner J, Klimpfinger M (2011) TNM stage and grade in predicting the prognosis of operated, non‐functioning neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas—a single‐institution experience. J Surg Oncol 104:17–21CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Poultsides GA, Huang LC, Chen Y et al (2012) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: radiographic calcifications correlate with grade and metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2295–2303CrossRefPubMed Poultsides GA, Huang LC, Chen Y et al (2012) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: radiographic calcifications correlate with grade and metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2295–2303CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Procacci C, Carbognin G, Accordini S et al (2001) Nonfunctioning endocrine tumors of the pancreas: possibilities of spiral CT characterization. Eur Radiol 11:1175–1183CrossRefPubMed Procacci C, Carbognin G, Accordini S et al (2001) Nonfunctioning endocrine tumors of the pancreas: possibilities of spiral CT characterization. Eur Radiol 11:1175–1183CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rha SE, Jung SE, Lee KH, Ku YM, Byun JY, Lee JM (2007) CT and MR imaging findings of endocrine tumor of the pancreas according to WHO classification. Eur J Radiol 62:371–377CrossRefPubMed Rha SE, Jung SE, Lee KH, Ku YM, Byun JY, Lee JM (2007) CT and MR imaging findings of endocrine tumor of the pancreas according to WHO classification. Eur J Radiol 62:371–377CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rodallec M, Vilgrain V, Zins M, Couvelard A, Ruszniewski P, Menu Y (2002) Helical CT of pancreatic endocrine tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:728–733CrossRefPubMed Rodallec M, Vilgrain V, Zins M, Couvelard A, Ruszniewski P, Menu Y (2002) Helical CT of pancreatic endocrine tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:728–733CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference d'Assignies G, Couvelard A, Bahrami S et al (2009) Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors1. Radiology 250:407–416CrossRefPubMed d'Assignies G, Couvelard A, Bahrami S et al (2009) Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors1. Radiology 250:407–416CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rodallec M, Vilgrain V, Couvelard A et al (2006) Endocrine pancreatic tumours and helical CT: contrast enhancement is correlated with microvascular density, histoprognostic factors and survival. Pancreatology 6:77–85CrossRefPubMed Rodallec M, Vilgrain V, Couvelard A et al (2006) Endocrine pancreatic tumours and helical CT: contrast enhancement is correlated with microvascular density, histoprognostic factors and survival. Pancreatology 6:77–85CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tatsumoto S, Kodama Y, Sakurai Y, Shinohara T, Katanuma A, Maguchi H (2013) Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: correlation between computed tomography enhancement patterns and prognostic factors of surgical and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Abdom Imaging 38:358–366CrossRefPubMed Tatsumoto S, Kodama Y, Sakurai Y, Shinohara T, Katanuma A, Maguchi H (2013) Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: correlation between computed tomography enhancement patterns and prognostic factors of surgical and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Abdom Imaging 38:358–366CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Worhunsky DJ, Krampitz GW, Poullos PD et al (2014) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: hypoenhancement on arterial phase computed tomography predicts biological aggressiveness. HPB 16:304–311CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Worhunsky DJ, Krampitz GW, Poullos PD et al (2014) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: hypoenhancement on arterial phase computed tomography predicts biological aggressiveness. HPB 16:304–311CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Edge SB, Byrd D, Compton C, Fritz A, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York, pp 285–296 Edge SB, Byrd D, Compton C, Fritz A, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York, pp 285–296
16.
go back to reference Kim DW, Kim HJ, Kim KW et al (2014) Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas at dynamic enhanced CT: comparison between grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma and grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumour. Eur Radiol 25(5):1375–1383 Kim DW, Kim HJ, Kim KW et al (2014) Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas at dynamic enhanced CT: comparison between grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma and grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumour. Eur Radiol 25(5):1375–1383
17.
go back to reference Tummala P, Rao S, Agarwal B (2013) Differential diagnosis of focal non-cystic pancreatic lesions with and without proximal dilation of pancreatic duct noted on CT scan. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 4:e42CrossRef Tummala P, Rao S, Agarwal B (2013) Differential diagnosis of focal non-cystic pancreatic lesions with and without proximal dilation of pancreatic duct noted on CT scan. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 4:e42CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fischer L, Kleeff J, Esposito I et al (2008) Clinical outcome and long‐term survival in 118 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg 95:627–635CrossRefPubMed Fischer L, Kleeff J, Esposito I et al (2008) Clinical outcome and long‐term survival in 118 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg 95:627–635CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Martin RC, Kooby DA, Weber SM et al (2011) Analysis of 6,747 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors for a proposed staging system. J Gastrointest Surg 15:175–183CrossRefPubMed Martin RC, Kooby DA, Weber SM et al (2011) Analysis of 6,747 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors for a proposed staging system. J Gastrointest Surg 15:175–183CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hammerstingl RM, Vogl TJ (2005) Abdominal MDCT: protocols and contrast considerations. Eur Radiol Suppl 15:e78–e90CrossRef Hammerstingl RM, Vogl TJ (2005) Abdominal MDCT: protocols and contrast considerations. Eur Radiol Suppl 15:e78–e90CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Marin D, Nelson RC, Barnhart H et al (2010) Detection of pancreatic tumors, image quality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: Effect of a low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current CT technique—preliminary results 1. Radiology 256:450–459CrossRefPubMed Marin D, Nelson RC, Barnhart H et al (2010) Detection of pancreatic tumors, image quality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: Effect of a low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current CT technique—preliminary results 1. Radiology 256:450–459CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PNET): Staging accuracy of MDCT and its diagnostic performance for the differentiation of PNET with uncommon CT findings from pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Authors
Jung Hoon Kim
Hyo Won Eun
Young Jae Kim
Jeong Min Lee
Joon Koo Han
Byung-Ihn Choi
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3941-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

European Radiology 5/2016 Go to the issue